polite_gandalf wrote on May 15
th, 2014 at 2:21pm:
freediver wrote on May 15
th, 2014 at 12:37pm:
Unless it is against freedom of speech.
Sloganeering can be fun FD - but it doesn't change the reality that most muslim countries have strict laws against any kind of organised protesting.
Nor does it change the fact that you are incapable of explaining away the contradictions in your own statements, pretending to support freedom of speech. You just wait for the topic to go away, then jump back in when some other issue pops up.
Would it be reasonable to conclude from your behaviour that when self identified "progressive" Muslims claim to support freedom of speech, they should not be trusted?
freediver wrote on May 10
th, 2014 at 10:17am:
That seems to be it. I'll elaborate for you. You offer your limp wristed support for freedom of speech when it costs nothing. You wave the white flag to your fellow Muslims if there is going to be any cost at all. And in realistic scenarios you support censorship, but you only talk about it in a limited and carefully selected set of contexts where you can make yourself look normal. You have spent the rest of the thread offering excuse after excuse for why you cannot possibly reveal the extent of your support for censorship, often invoking trickery on my part.
freediver wrote on May 13
th, 2014 at 7:20pm:
Quote:I don't support censorship in the interests of pandering to those who threaten violence.
Yet you have stood by your original claim that you do, albeit trying to blame it on some kind of trickery on my part. Or are you merely saying you support censorship in this context, but for different reasons?
Is this some kind of infidel trickery Gandalf? Am I cynically using wishy washy western liberal morals to attack Islam?