Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke' (Read 4518 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53282
At my desk.
Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
May 11th, 2013 at 9:04am
 
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-10/greenpeace-blames-coke-for-channel-9-27choke27/4682548



Greenpeace has accused Channel Nine of caving to pressure from beverage giant Coca-Cola after the network banned a controversial ad supporting a national recycling scheme.

The Greenpeace advertisement begins in the style of a Coca-Cola ad, with a woman drinking a bottle of Coke on a beach as DJ Adrian Lux's song Teenage Crime plays in the background.

As the woman takes a sip of Coke, a bird falls out of the sky in front of her, followed by hundreds of other dead birds.

The clip, which has received more than half-a-million hits on YouTube, then shows images of dead sea birds with their stomachs full of pieces of plastic.

The ad aims to promote legislation for a new 10-cents-a-bottle recycling scheme, similar to the one already in place in South Australia.

Greenpeace says Coca-Cola and other beverage makers have led extensive campaigns against cash-for-container schemes and are lobbying against the legislation.

Last week, Greenpeace raised $20,000 in donations in just 24 hours to get the advertisement run during Channel Nine's Friday Night Football broadcast.

But late yesterday, Channel Nine announced they were pulling the ad, despite having accepted the $20,000.

A spokeswoman for Coca-Cola says no one from the company had contact with or put pressure on Channel 9 not to run the advertisement.

A Greenpeace spokesman says Channel Nine initially said they were banning the ad because it was biased.

The broadcaster has since issued a statement saying the advertisement is "offensive".

But Greenpeace says Channel Nine has bowed to pressure from Coke.

"They took the money and now they've bottled it," Greenpeace's Reece Turner said.

"Coke has been accused of bullying politicians into blocking cash for containers.

"It's a reasonable assumption their influence is behind Channel Nine's last-minute choking."

A Greenpeace spokesman says Channel Nine's decision makes sense, considering Coke's "enormous capacity in terms of advertising".

In a statement, Channel Nine's sales and marketing director Peter Wiltshire defended the network's decision.

"We had no issue in taking the original booking from Greenpeace but on reviewing the content we deemed it to be offensive to our viewers and so advised the client we would not proceed with the placement on the Network," he said.

"We have refunded the original deposit."
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #1 - May 11th, 2013 at 9:08am
 
Quote:
on reviewing the content we deemed it to be offensive to our viewers


I 'deem' what 9 have done to be far more offensiive.

Coke were wrong to put their oar in, and 9 shoud be ashamed of itself for capitulating.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #2 - May 11th, 2013 at 9:10am
 
Can I just add that the bird at the start is Fely Irvine from Hi-Five fame.

Fit as.

As far as the rest of the story, I couldn't really give a monkey's toss/
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #3 - May 11th, 2013 at 9:11am
 
Coke deserves to be boycotted for this ...
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #4 - May 11th, 2013 at 9:27am
 
Yeah, that'll happen......
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #5 - May 11th, 2013 at 10:09am
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 9:10am:
Can I just add that the bird at the start is Fely Irvine from Hi-Five fame.

Fit as.

As far as the rest of the story, I couldn't really give a monkey's toss/




We are not surprised.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
The Heartless Felon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2869
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #6 - May 11th, 2013 at 11:50am
 

Nine made a commercial decision. So what?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #7 - May 11th, 2013 at 11:59am
 
Quote:
A Greenpeace spokesman says Channel Nine's decision makes sense, considering Coke's "enormous capacity in terms of advertising".


It really is no surprise.
Commercial networks only interest is the bottom line.

For years we've seen their current affairs shows go after the soft and easy targets. Not wanting to offend their major advertisers.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #8 - May 11th, 2013 at 12:15pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 11:59am:
Quote:
A Greenpeace spokesman says Channel Nine's decision makes sense, considering Coke's "enormous capacity in terms of advertising".


It really is no surprise.
Commercial networks only interest is the bottom line.

For years we've seen their current affairs shows go after the soft and easy targets. Not wanting to offend their major advertisers.


what is it? every 4 or 6 weeks they do a story about some great deal Gerry Harvey has at the moment? They aren't really current affairs shows anymore, they are just another 30 minute infomercial.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 154486
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #9 - May 11th, 2013 at 1:28pm
 
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 9:04am:
The broadcaster has since issued a statement saying the advertisement is "offensive".



So, why does this remain on air then?

...

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5520
Gender: female
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #10 - May 11th, 2013 at 1:39pm
 
Quote:
As far as the rest of the story, I couldn't really give a monkey's toss/


wow what a big man you are
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Innocent bystander
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #11 - May 11th, 2013 at 4:54pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 1:28pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 9:04am:
The broadcaster has since issued a statement saying the advertisement is "offensive".



So, why does this remain on air then?

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/562205_479681965382374_405172626_n.jp...





Haha ... good question, his old man must own the station or something  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #12 - May 11th, 2013 at 5:26pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 1:28pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 9:04am:
The broadcaster has since issued a statement saying the advertisement is "offensive".



So, why does this remain on air then?

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/562205_479681965382374_405172626_n.jp...






because hes goodlooking..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 154486
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #13 - May 11th, 2013 at 6:55pm
 
cods wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 5:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 1:28pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2013 at 9:04am:
The broadcaster has since issued a statement saying the advertisement is "offensive".



So, why does this remain on air then?

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/562205_479681965382374_405172626_n.jp...






because hes goodlooking..



Really?

OK, I'll take your word for it.

But we can all agree he's an A-Grade Moron, yes?


Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Greenpeace blames Coke for Channel 9 'choke'
Reply #14 - May 11th, 2013 at 7:29pm
 
the odd thing is that the deposit scheme has worked and worked well for 30 years so I don't know what Coke's problem with it is. Everyone supports it and you will notice you don't see bottles littering the streets like they are in other states. sales of coke didnt drop either since it affects everyone. and the cost to coke has to be negligible at best since it already has systems in place for SA.

truly odd.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print