Brian Ross wrote on May 14
th, 2013 at 9:29am:
Chard wrote on May 14
th, 2013 at 12:20am:
Depending on how you define "murderers" I work for an institution that's really damn good at it. Then again, it's not like it really bothers me in any way. The pay is nice and the benefits are outstanding.
US military?
FBI?
CIA?
US Government as a whole?
US Department of Defense. I specialize in missile defense, so technically I guess my job is to help prevent murder on large scales, but deep down I like working on or around things that go wooshKABOOM.
Quote:I wouldn't suggest they're really good at Murder. Prolific perhaps but they do tend to, "use a sledgehammer to crack a walnut," don't they?
That's because the sledgehammer is very noticeable, so you're looking at that while we're constantly rippling off cruise missiles or sending JSOC units in to quitely murder people in the background.
Quote:A.A.Milne (of "Winne the Pooh" fame) pointed out, "the bomber pilot must answer for each individual bomb he drops..." (or words to that effect).
Of course they need to account for the bombs dropped. How else are you supposed to properly assess how effective the strike was if you don't know where the bombs actually hit?
Quote:Murder? Not necessarily, if committed as by a military person in a state of war, as classified by law but morally, definitely.
You can make an argument that it's legal during wartime against valid targets of military importance, but when you get to the nuts and bolts it all comes down to two things.
1. Killing people.
2. Breaking stuff.
We just happen to be very good at doing both on scales going from some guy in a hut to leveling entire cities.