Baronvonrort wrote on Aug 29^th, 2013 at 7:37pm:


Who cares what Iranians do you smacking dummy. We are in Australia, let's worry about that. In the Middle East, they aren't doing much different now to what they have always done.

The mistake the West made was indentifying and engaging terrorists as agents of a religious entity when they were a fringe element in most Islamic societies. Now all we've done is fed and empowered them as a pan-Islamic movement, giving them a lot of credibility considering how the West has acted. Other than that they are irrelevant and should be ignored.

The subject comes up here far too often for it to be anything other than targeted hate propaganda, which is exactly what it is from most of the posters here. Dumb, armchair intellectual wannabes talking about things they have no smacking clue about. You don't realise how stupid you look to educated people.

freediver wrote on Aug 29^th, 2013 at 8:21pm:


Any boogeyman that anyone who reads this forum would infer from the number of hysterical posts on the subject, which are completely out of proportion to the actual influence the Islamic world has on any of those posting.

freediver wrote on Aug 29^th, 2013 at 9:04pm:


The items you listed aren't mutually exclusive to Islam, you will find many parallels in other cultures. They are only issues because targetted propaganda with an agenda made them so. My original statement about not buying into Islamic boogeymen based on the hype surrounding the subject on this forum is accurate. The disproportionate anti-Islam propaganda posts on here are the result of an agenda of a percentage of the users on this special interests board. The subjects enjoys overexposure here for that reason. The reason being that people with an agenda against Islam are using every opportunity to churn out anti-Islamic propaganda. The is also the case on the world stage, any group could be targetted like this as an exercise in vilification, it just happens to be Islam in this case. To make comparisons becomes abstract and open to semantics lawyering. 50 years ago it was the Soviet 'Evil Empire', now it's Islamofascism.

Soren wrote on Aug 29^th, 2013 at 9:40pm:


I will only respond to plain questions.

1. Islamofascism is a boogeyman of Western propaganda, it's not a real political movement. The 'agenda' against Islam on a global level is a propaganda exercise being conducted in parallel with military exercises. It is being conducted as a part of the US plan to maintain global military and economic hegemony.

2. What does my opinion on actual political movements of the past got to do with a boogeyman designed to keep people in fear and compliant?

3. What does my opinion on the validity of global political movements have to do with a made up boogeyman?

The reactiona against Islam as a focal point for terrorism is as ridiculous as someone invading America and calling resistance Christianofascism because the majority of people who participate identify as Christian purely by virtue of their background and location.

The two things are completely unconnected, there IS a Western agenda regarding military involvement in the Middle East, common elements of religion and ethnicity have been extrapolated into an easily digested idea of Islam = 'all the bad things including the last major boogeyman we sold you to show you we meant business: FASCISM!'.

freediver wrote on Aug 29^th, 2013 at 6:32pm:


From the country that brought us Hiroshima and napalming Vietnamese villagers comes 9/11:

Adamant wrote on May 2^nd, 2013 at 10:56am:


Did you notice that in this entire report the words 'Islam' or 'Muslims' are not used even once?

PC?

I used to believe that, but I've come to believe that they don't want to die in their office being bombed.

This is True Colours' "0.001%" Muslims putting a lid on free reporting because journalists don't want to get killed.

wally1 wrote on Aug 30^th, 2013 at 7:29am:


True. FD is promoting forced Muslim marriages.

Shame, leftards, shame.