Australian Politics Forum - Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #135 - Jun 7^th, 2013 at 6:50pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 9:35am:

Emma wrote on Jun 6^th, 2013 at 9:51pm:

[i]Good thing sanity is not a requirment for posting on this baord.

First up tens of thousands of cattle need feed or they will starve to death in the paddocks. Secondly these national parks are ex-pastoral land, yes not so long ago they were cattle farms and have since been converted into national parks.

...and what were these lands prior to Cook landing?

were there any introduced pests such as cows and sheep present prior to the invasion, theft of land and genocidal practices perpetrated by the English imperial fascist hoards upon the original inhabitants of this great land?

Although according to the British, this land was classified under the convenient phrase Terra Nallius - a land void of people

I stand corrected the pair of you are friggen certifiable.

Nothing of what you wrote has anything to do with what I wrote.

Back to top

IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..??? Reply #136 - Jun 7^th, 2013 at 7:07pm really..?? we're crazy, and you are correct. That's what you think, cos what?? only crazy people would disagree with you,...? I bet you secretly idolise JOH too... just like that brickhead Glen Lazarus...
Back to top	live every day IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #137 - Jun 9^th, 2013 at 1:04am

ah ha..

I got it right!! oh delight delight

... you are a filthy Joh-lover.!
Your failure to respond says it all. Hang your head in shame you fwit.
Lie down down with fleas and you get up with FWITS,..!!

You were all probably mates ...in your sick dreams, redneck hick. Cheesy

BigOl64

...you are a nasty piece of work, as I see on other places in this forum... so..??

you know what you can do ???
(oh I'm sure your imagination allows plenty of room for fantasy) Grin

.. perhaps I'll leave it at that WANKER.

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..??? Reply #138 - Jun 9^th, 2013 at 1:13am yeah -- you just lost out to Quantum as major troll of the forum.. well my vote went to Quewpydoll ....but only just. YOU are a disgrace... a blight... a piece of snot sticking to the screen. Slide off fwit.
Back to top	live every day IP Logged

BigOl64 Gold Member Offline Posts: 14438 Townsville QLD Gender:	Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..??? Reply #139 - Jun 9^th, 2013 at 8:28am Yes, those last three posts were definitely the thoughts of a sane person.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #140 - Jun 9^th, 2013 at 4:38pm

Emma wrote on Jun 5^th, 2013 at 10:49pm:

so keep on your locals about alternatives.

Hey ..expect no help from the Newman Govt...they listen only to their preferred team..

hence the opening up of National Parks... yep NATIONAL PARKS for cattle grazing, again. .. Angry

A policy belonging decades in the past.. One example. ! Angry

the 'easing of 'green tape' (their spin) ... which enables landowners, once again, to clear vegetation.. virtually at will.!!

DISGUSTING...!!!

CL..?? your stats re foreign ownership are indeed poignant.

Seems we LIVE here... but every rich cnt in the world can do as they please. Angry

massively EMPOWERED by Newman Govt Policy.

SHAME SHAME SHAME

THE GREAT BARRIER REEF IS AT GREAT RISK........

no snorkelling in oil sludge.. Sad

THE NEWMAN GOVT, ACCORDING LEVEL 8 PUBLIC SERVANTS JUST ABOUT ANYWHERE, IS JUST ONE OF THOSE GOVERNMENTS!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..??? Reply #141 - Jun 9^th, 2013 at 10:27pm BigOl64 wrote on Jun 9^th, 2013 at 8:28am: Yes, those last three posts were definitely the thoughts of a sane person. just like some of your posts vilifying other posters... like Pansi for example. THAT you cannot deny....
Back to top	live every day IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #142 - Jun 11^th, 2013 at 9:53am

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 6:50pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 9:35am:

Emma wrote on Jun 6^th, 2013 at 9:51pm:

[i]Good thing sanity is not a requirment for posting on this baord.

First up tens of thousands of cattle need feed or they will starve to death in the paddocks. Secondly these national parks are ex-pastoral land, yes not so long ago they were cattle farms and have since been converted into national parks.

...and what were these lands prior to Cook landing?

were there any introduced pests such as cows and sheep present prior to the invasion, theft of land and genocidal practices perpetrated by the English imperial fascist hoards upon the original inhabitants of this great land?

Although according to the British, this land was classified under the convenient phrase Terra Nallius - a land void of people

I stand corrected the pair of you are friggen certifiable.

Nothing of what you wrote has anything to do with what I wrote
.

...the classic response from one who has been publically exposed as a immoral corporatised clown puppet

congratulations!

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #143 - Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:09am

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 9:35am:

Emma wrote on Jun 6^th, 2013 at 9:51pm:

[i]Good thing sanity is not a requirment for posting on this baord.

First up tens of thousands of cattle need feed or they will starve to death in the paddocks. Secondly these national parks are ex-pastoral land, yes not so long ago they were cattle farms and have since been converted into national parks.

...and what were these lands prior to Cook landing?

were there any introduced pests such as cows and sheep present prior to the invasion, theft of land and genocidal practices perpetrated by the English imperial fascist hoards upon the original inhabitants of this great land?

Although according to the British, this land was classified under the convenient phrase Terra Nallius - a land void of people

Actually Terra NULLIUS means 'land belonging to no one', it means that that it has never been under the control of any state or government.

Doesn't have anything to do with whether or not it's occupied.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #144 - Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:26am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:09am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 9:35am:

Emma wrote on Jun 6^th, 2013 at 9:51pm:

[i]Good thing sanity is not a requirment for posting on this baord.

First up tens of thousands of cattle need feed or they will starve to death in the paddocks. Secondly these national parks are ex-pastoral land, yes not so long ago they were cattle farms and have since been converted into national parks.

...and what were these lands prior to Cook landing?

were there any introduced pests such as cows and sheep present prior to the invasion, theft of land and genocidal practices perpetrated by the English imperial fascist hoards upon the original inhabitants of this great land?

Although according to the British, this land was classified under the convenient phrase Terra Nallius - a land void of people

Actually Terra NULLIUS means 'land belonging to no one', it means that that it has never been under the control of any state or government.

Doesn't have anything to do with whether or not it's occupied.

You just posted a disingenuous statement in public,

Do you know WHERE in AUstralia the British made the Terra Nullius declaration? HINT - it wasn't on the mainland, conveniently.

Do you know WHY the British declared Terra Nullius post invasion?

Australia is the only commonwealth country without a TREATY with the original people of this land.

And that's because there were NO people here according to the British. Legally, the British fascist forces classified the Indigenous peoples of Australia under the same class as fauna - ie plants and animals. This was legally the case until the referendum that was passed in 1967.

You cannot declare Terra Nullius on a territory if PEOPLE are already living and occupying the land.

This is exactly WHY the British declared Terra Nullius on a remote un-inhabited island, and then transferred that classification to the rest of Australia.

Check the facts before you gallop in here with your deceiving excrement and deflectionary racist fascist dogma

cheers

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #145 - Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:27am

Emma wrote on Jun 9^th, 2013 at 10:27pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 9^th, 2013 at 8:28am:

Yes, those last three posts were definitely the thoughts of a sane person. Grin

just like some of your posts vilifying other posters... like Pansi for example. THAT you cannot deny....

Why would I deny vilifying pansi, she is a vile human being that deserves everything she gets and more.

My response to you after your little tirade (vilification) was reasonable and apt, your attack on me was certifiable insane. It had nothing what-so-ever to do with what I wrote.

People get from me nothing more than they deserve, behave like a sane human being and you will be treated like one.

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #146 - Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:31am

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 11^th, 2013 at 9:53am:

BigOl64 wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 6:50pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 9:35am:

Emma wrote on Jun 6^th, 2013 at 9:51pm:

[i]Good thing sanity is not a requirment for posting on this baord.

First up tens of thousands of cattle need feed or they will starve to death in the paddocks. Secondly these national parks are ex-pastoral land, yes not so long ago they were cattle farms and have since been converted into national parks.

...and what were these lands prior to Cook landing?

were there any introduced pests such as cows and sheep present prior to the invasion, theft of land and genocidal practices perpetrated by the English imperial fascist hoards upon the original inhabitants of this great land?

Although according to the British, this land was classified under the convenient phrase Terra Nallius - a land void of people

I stand corrected the pair of you are friggen certifiable.

Nothing of what you wrote has anything to do with what I wrote
.

...the classic response from one who has been publically exposed as a immoral corporatised clown puppet

congratulations!

Your insane rant about british invasion/fascism had nothing at all to do with feeding starving cattle on previous grazing land converted into national park. So I stand by my accusation of insanity, which also has nothing to do with my exposure to corporatisation. Grin

Remember I only discussed feeding of cattle on previously run grazing land, nothing else; so buck up insane clown posse; nothing else was part of my discussion.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #147 - Jun 14^th, 2013 at 11:55am

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:26am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:09am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 9:35am:

Emma wrote on Jun 6^th, 2013 at 9:51pm:

[i]Good thing sanity is not a requirment for posting on this baord.

First up tens of thousands of cattle need feed or they will starve to death in the paddocks. Secondly these national parks are ex-pastoral land, yes not so long ago they were cattle farms and have since been converted into national parks.

...and what were these lands prior to Cook landing?

were there any introduced pests such as cows and sheep present prior to the invasion, theft of land and genocidal practices perpetrated by the English imperial fascist hoards upon the original inhabitants of this great land?

Although according to the British, this land was classified under the convenient phrase Terra Nallius - a land void of people

Actually Terra NULLIUS means 'land belonging to no one', it means that that it has never been under the control of any state or government.

Doesn't have anything to do with whether or not it's occupied.

You just posted a disingenuous statement in public,

Do you know WHERE in AUstralia the British made the Terra Nullius declaration? HINT - it wasn't on the mainland, conveniently.

Do you know WHY the British declared Terra Nullius post invasion?

Australia is the only commonwealth country without a TREATY with the original people of this land.

And that's because there were NO people here according to the British. Legally, the British fascist forces classified the Indigenous peoples of Australia under the same class as fauna - ie plants and animals. This was legally the case until the referendum that was passed in 1967.

You cannot declare Terra Nullius on a territory if PEOPLE are already living and occupying the land.

This is exactly WHY the British declared Terra Nullius on a remote un-inhabited island, and then transferred that classification to the rest of Australia.

Check the facts before you gallop in here with your deceiving excrement and deflectionary racist fascist dogma

cheers

Actually you can declare Terra Nullius on occupied land. The reason the British did so in Australia is that they couldn't find a central Aboriginal authority that was able to sign treaties, and that there was no recognisable political organisations that they could find.

You might also want to check the facts, in this case International Laws, rather than going straight from radical land rights websites.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Emma

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9853
OZ
Gender: female

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #148 - Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:47pm

I'm really annoyed that you keep using an incorrect quote from me, as the central post... THAT QUOTE of 6 June was a simple stuff-up by someone ..CL? perhaps, not accustomed to the way the QUOTE function works.
(i still haven't worked it out.. a slight twitch,, and lordy lordy,, anything can appear. Roll Eyes

)
ANY HOW my point...

I DID"NT SAY WHAT IS ESPOUSED ...THAT WAS ANOTHER POSTER... i HAVE BROUGHT THIS UP PREVIOUSLY...

CEASE AND DESIST FROM MISQUOTING ME...
IN CONTINUING TO DO SO ... Angry

YOUR ARGUMENT BECOMES BOGUS AND IRRELEVANT...........

Back to top

live every day

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: Great Barrier Reef...will WE destroy it..???
Reply #149 - Jun 24^th, 2013 at 11:20am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 11:55am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:26am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jun 14^th, 2013 at 10:09am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jun 7^th, 2013 at 9:35am:

Emma wrote on Jun 6^th, 2013 at 9:51pm:

[i]Good thing sanity is not a requirment for posting on this baord.

First up tens of thousands of cattle need feed or they will starve to death in the paddocks. Secondly these national parks are ex-pastoral land, yes not so long ago they were cattle farms and have since been converted into national parks.

...and what were these lands prior to Cook landing?

were there any introduced pests such as cows and sheep present prior to the invasion, theft of land and genocidal practices perpetrated by the English imperial fascist hoards upon the original inhabitants of this great land?

Although according to the British, this land was classified under the convenient phrase Terra Nallius - a land void of people

Actually Terra NULLIUS means 'land belonging to no one', it means that that it has never been under the control of any state or government.

Doesn't have anything to do with whether or not it's occupied.

You just posted a disingenuous statement in public,

Do you know WHERE in AUstralia the British made the Terra Nullius declaration? HINT - it wasn't on the mainland, conveniently.

Do you know WHY the British declared Terra Nullius post invasion?

Australia is the only commonwealth country without a TREATY with the original people of this land.

And that's because there were NO people here according to the British. Legally, the British fascist forces classified the Indigenous peoples of Australia under the same class as fauna - ie plants and animals. This was legally the case until the referendum that was passed in 1967.

You cannot declare Terra Nullius on a territory if PEOPLE are already living and occupying the land.

This is exactly WHY the British declared Terra Nullius on a remote un-inhabited island, and then transferred that classification to the rest of Australia.

Check the facts before you gallop in here with your deceiving excrement and deflectionary racist fascist dogma

cheers

Actually you can declare Terra Nullius on occupied land. The reason the British did so in Australia is that they couldn't find a central Aboriginal authority that was able to sign treaties, and that there was no recognisable political organisations that they could find.

You might also want to check the facts, in this case International Laws, rather than going straight from radical land rights websites.

Really?

Explains why the invading British made the Terra Nullius declaration on a remote uninhabited island and then transferred that declaration to the rest of the continent.

What is this international law that you refer to that allows for the theft of an entire continent, the enslavement of its people, the practice of genocide, the NON-compensation of the original inhabitants and the total avoidance of any treaty arrangements.

You must be talking about piracy and terrorist based fascism here.

Surely that's not part of international law?

Take you guilt ridden apologetics and racist garbage elsewhere you immoral clown puppet freak maggot

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Is the Great Barrier ReeF more important than Profits ?
* This poll has now closed *
Yes 5 (50.0%) no 2 (20.0%) Yes, depending on the current economic climate 1 (10.0%) No ..Economic demands trump the Reef 0 (0.0%) Yes.. without exception 0 (0.0%) NO , altho some enviro issues may be consi 1 (10.0%) No ...Our Country needs Mining profits regardless 0 (0.0%) ABSOLUTELY YES ..IT IS 1 (10.0%) Total votes: 10 « Created by: Emma on: Apr 30^th, 2013 at 11:50pm »