Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 5
th, 2013 at 4:29am:
Ahhh i see. A way to get poor ppl to stop voting!
SOB
Darn SPOT!
You have seen through my 'scheme'.
Yes, my 'scheme', is a conspiracy against all of those poor Australians,
to force them not to vote.
/sarc off
+++
"Your idea will have the consequence of:
Get me in government and ill make the people so poor, they will have to take the money."
progressiveslol,
No one can 'force' anyone, to accept money from another person, rather than do something else.
Q.
Who would choose to, effectively, 'sell themselves', for $200 ?
A.
Those persons who are more interested in selfish consumerism, than in having a direct influence upon the formation of government and choosing lawmakers.
And surely
that should be our choice, ....and a choice for the people of both camps ?
In a country like Australia,
consumerism, is a lifestyle choice.
e.g.
Choosing to get overweight, by eating Big Macs.
What right do
you we have, to tell people that the can't have their big macs ?
The right of any normal person to have
the right to have a preoccupation with the acquisition of 'things' and to becoming obese, is a basic human right!

Normal people in Australia don't have time to involve themselves, in who is going to be elected to parliament.
They would rather go to the nearest shopping complex, and max out their credit card.
With another $200 'on offer', society is just helping them to fulfil their unavoidable destiny as an Australian consumer.
Offering those
who are entitled to vote, [say,] $200,
not to vote....
Its a free choice, or actually it is 'enhancing' their 'freedom of choice'.
Such a 'scheme' is merely offering 'the people' yet another [consumer] choice, freely.Dictionary;
consumerism = = the preoccupation of society with the acquisition of goods.