Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 
Send Topic Print
Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax? (Read 29583 times)
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #255 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:28am
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:01pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 4:53pm:
it is the single issue that is killing the ALP even more than usual.



Well you see that's where we differ.

I don't believe that is the one single issue most responsible for Labors position.

The one single issue that I believe has more to do with Labors position than anything else is how Gillard became PM.

Australians rightly or wrongly felt betrayed/cheated, everything else after that just added to the feelings of resentment.

If it were just a matter of the CT I believe the polls would be 49/51 alternating just about every week.



you can believe it all you like. the facts however show that the CT is massively unpoplar by a 2:1 margin. if it were ONLY the CT the ratio could be 65:35.  be grateful there are other issues that keep the figure as 'close' as it is.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #256 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:29am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:28am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:01pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 4:53pm:
it is the single issue that is killing the ALP even more than usual.



Well you see that's where we differ.

I don't believe that is the one single issue most responsible for Labors position.

The one single issue that I believe has more to do with Labors position than anything else is how Gillard became PM.

Australians rightly or wrongly felt betrayed/cheated, everything else after that just added to the feelings of resentment.

If it were just a matter of the CT I believe the polls would be 49/51 alternating just about every week.



you can believe it all you like. the facts however show that the CT is massively unpoplar by a 2:1 margin. if it were ONLY the CT the ratio could be 65:35.  be grateful there are other issues that keep the figure as 'close' as it is.


you keep saying that but you've yet to show the facts ... show the facts.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #257 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:30am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:19pm:
John Smith wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 4:55pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 4:53pm:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 1:50pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 1:44pm:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 12:08pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 11:14am:
And as usual,they are unwilling to accept that the carbon tax adn the ETS are unwanted by a notable  majority of voters



Proof?

A notable amount of voters wanted it in 07. - Rudd elected
Not enough didn't in 10 - Tony failed

So if all your relying on for your "Notable" majority is the so called broken promise Sunrise youtube & the fact we got a hung parliament, excuse me if I doubt.

Anything more solid?



the question of the carbon tax/ETS has been polled repeatedly over the past few years. the results always show a signficant majority opposing it.


Want to link some of those results?

Don't bother if they are Murdoch daily rag online crap.

I can't seem to remember any sort of significant poll of merit producing your Notable Majority.


it was galaxy of newspoll or the like. I could research it but Im surprised that you question that the carbon tax hs been polled and found to be exceedingly unpopular and not wanted. not even labot pretends that it is popular or wanted by the majority. after all, it is the single issue that is killing the ALP even more than usual.


we 'labots' leave all the pretending to you.


The majority of Australians (and I mean a real majority, not Longy's pretend majority which can also be a minority if he agrees with them) have supported action on climate change for over a decade. Polls have consistently showed this. Federal Labor have had carbon pricing (this means either and ETS or tax) as core policy for many election cycles. Going into the 2007 election, both major parties went in with an ETS as core policy. At the time Tony Abbott was talking real economics and explaining why a price on carbon was necessary and why a carbon tax was a better option than the coalition's policy at the time (an ETS).

It is pretty absurd to claim after all that, that the majority of Australians are opposed.


except when actually polled ont he actual question of a carbon taxt they oppose it by a margin of 2:1.  thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.

Sheer intellectual dishonesty: typiclal Greens thinking.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #258 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:33am
 
John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:29am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:28am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:01pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 4:53pm:
it is the single issue that is killing the ALP even more than usual.



Well you see that's where we differ.

I don't believe that is the one single issue most responsible for Labors position.

The one single issue that I believe has more to do with Labors position than anything else is how Gillard became PM.

Australians rightly or wrongly felt betrayed/cheated, everything else after that just added to the feelings of resentment.

If it were just a matter of the CT I believe the polls would be 49/51 alternating just about every week.



you can believe it all you like. the facts however show that the CT is massively unpoplar by a 2:1 margin. if it were ONLY the CT the ratio could be 65:35.  be grateful there are other issues that keep the figure as 'close' as it is.


you keep saying that but you've yet to show the facts ... show the facts.


I find it remarkable that after 2 years of high level debate and reporting on this topic a chimp like you still doesnt realise how unpopular the CT is. it is as if you are incpabale of reading and remembering articles and polls since.

But i have to remember you are the same dimwit that believes a blog entry over the Treasury figures.

you are one person who doesnt deserve facts pushed into your face. You arent really capable of accepting facts you dont like.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #259 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the comuntity as much as you might want it to.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #260 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:42am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:33am:
a chimp like you still doesnt realise how unpopular the CT



Be careful who you label Chimps.

Take a good look at those on parliament house lawn, have a good look who's driving the "Convoy of no confidence"

A chimp is an intellectual giant compared to most of your "Majority"
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #261 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 10:03am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:33am:
John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:29am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:28am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:01pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 4:53pm:
it is the single issue that is killing the ALP even more than usual.



Well you see that's where we differ.

I don't believe that is the one single issue most responsible for Labors position.

The one single issue that I believe has more to do with Labors position than anything else is how Gillard became PM.

Australians rightly or wrongly felt betrayed/cheated, everything else after that just added to the feelings of resentment.

If it were just a matter of the CT I believe the polls would be 49/51 alternating just about every week.



you can believe it all you like. the facts however show that the CT is massively unpoplar by a 2:1 margin. if it were ONLY the CT the ratio could be 65:35.  be grateful there are other issues that keep the figure as 'close' as it is.


you keep saying that but you've yet to show the facts ... show the facts.


I find it remarkable that after 2 years of high level debate and reporting on this topic a chimp like you still doesnt realise how unpopular the CT is. it is as if you are incpabale of reading and remembering articles and polls since.

But i have to remember you are the same dimwit that believes a blog entry over the Treasury figures.

you are one person who doesnt deserve facts pushed into your face. You arent really capable of accepting facts you dont like.


blah blah blah .. the only reason you go on and on about everything else is because you know you have no figures to support your hypothesis .... admit you made it up and shut up the bugger up
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51828
At my desk.
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #262 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:08am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the comuntity as much as you might want it to.


Shifting the goal posts again eh Longy? A mandate is a majority which can be a minority if you agree with it. And a majority opposed to carbon pricing suddenly only becomes about a carbon tax and the politics around it, because you insist that people can't tell the difference between a tax and an ETS. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? You seem to do an aweful lot of insisting that other people can't think for themselves and need you to make up their mind for them, all the while pretending to be about the morals of a democratic mandate.

Quote:
thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.


You are a liar Longy. You are the only one here who says majority but means minority. You are the only one pretending to divine a single issue mandate from an election outcome.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:17am by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #263 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:04pm
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:42am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:33am:
a chimp like you still doesnt realise how unpopular the CT



Be careful who you label Chimps.

Take a good look at those on parliament house lawn, have a good look who's driving the "Convoy of no confidence"

A chimp is an intellectual giant compared to most of your "Majority"


thats the funny thing about a democracy. your intelligence is not in question - just your right to vote and hold an opinion.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #264 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:07pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:08am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the comuntity as much as you might want it to.


Shifting the goal posts again eh Longy? A mandate is a majority which can be a minority if you agree with it. And a majority opposed to carbon pricing suddenly only becomes about a carbon tax and the politics around it, because you insist that people can't tell the difference between a tax and an ETS. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? You seem to do an aweful lot of insisting that other people can't think for themselves and need you to make up their mind for them, all the while pretending to be about the morals of a democratic mandate.

Quote:
thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.


You are a liar Longy. You are the only one here who says majority but means minority. You are the only one pretending to divine a single issue mandate from an election outcome.


so says the hypocrite who happily says that labor has a mandate for a ETS based on what exactly? there was no plebiscite, just a couple elections. you just sunk your own argument.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60867
Here
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #265 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:54pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:07pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:08am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the comuntity as much as you might want it to.


Shifting the goal posts again eh Longy? A mandate is a majority which can be a minority if you agree with it. And a majority opposed to carbon pricing suddenly only becomes about a carbon tax and the politics around it, because you insist that people can't tell the difference between a tax and an ETS. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? You seem to do an aweful lot of insisting that other people can't think for themselves and need you to make up their mind for them, all the while pretending to be about the morals of a democratic mandate.

Quote:
thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.


You are a liar Longy. You are the only one here who says majority but means minority. You are the only one pretending to divine a single issue mandate from an election outcome.


so says the hypocrite who happily says that labor has a mandate for a ETS based on what exactly? there was no plebiscite, just a couple elections. you just sunk your own argument.



In 2007 boths sides stood for an ETS type outcome - almost 100% of the vote was supporting action on climate change. If this isn't a mandate I doubt that there ever was one, nobody was against it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #266 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 2:40pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:54pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:07pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:08am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the comuntity as much as you might want it to.


Shifting the goal posts again eh Longy? A mandate is a majority which can be a minority if you agree with it. And a majority opposed to carbon pricing suddenly only becomes about a carbon tax and the politics around it, because you insist that people can't tell the difference between a tax and an ETS. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? You seem to do an aweful lot of insisting that other people can't think for themselves and need you to make up their mind for them, all the while pretending to be about the morals of a democratic mandate.

Quote:
thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.


You are a liar Longy. You are the only one here who says majority but means minority. You are the only one pretending to divine a single issue mandate from an election outcome.


so says the hypocrite who happily says that labor has a mandate for a ETS based on what exactly? there was no plebiscite, just a couple elections. you just sunk your own argument.



In 2007 boths sides stood for an ETS type outcome - almost 100% of the vote was supporting action on climate change. If this isn't a mandate I doubt that there ever was one, nobody was against it.


well according the FD there are no mandates based on election policy therefore ther was no mandate.

now you lot ought to work out what you think because so far you want mandates when there are none and no mandates when there are.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51828
At my desk.
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #267 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 2:48pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:07pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:08am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the comuntity as much as you might want it to.


Shifting the goal posts again eh Longy? A mandate is a majority which can be a minority if you agree with it. And a majority opposed to carbon pricing suddenly only becomes about a carbon tax and the politics around it, because you insist that people can't tell the difference between a tax and an ETS. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? You seem to do an aweful lot of insisting that other people can't think for themselves and need you to make up their mind for them, all the while pretending to be about the morals of a democratic mandate.

Quote:
thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.


You are a liar Longy. You are the only one here who says majority but means minority. You are the only one pretending to divine a single issue mandate from an election outcome.


so says the hypocrite who happily says that labor has a mandate for a ETS based on what exactly? there was no plebiscite, just a couple elections. you just sunk your own argument.


These are simple points Longy. You were wrong to claim that the majority oppose carbon pricing. You were wrong about a minority being a majority. I am happy to discuss mandates with you. I even started a new thread explaining my views on mandates and challenging yours. You ran away when it emerged that you think a minority is a majority. Obviously it is hard to have a sensible discussion about what a mandate is with someone who does not understand what a majority is and who happily makes clearly false claims about public support for carbon pricing then shifts the goal posts when he is called out on it. There is no need to restart that debate from the beginning. We can skip straight to the point where you explain in what universe a minority can be called a majority and hence a mandate.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #268 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 3:42pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 2:48pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:07pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:08am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the community as much as you might want it to.


Shifting the goal posts again eh Longy? A mandate is a majority which can be a minority if you agree with it. And a majority opposed to carbon pricing suddenly only becomes about a carbon tax and the politics around it, because you insist that people can't tell the difference between a tax and an ETS. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? You seem to do an aweful lot of insisting that other people can't think for themselves and need you to make up their mind for them, all the while pretending to be about the morals of a democratic mandate.

Quote:
thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.


You are a liar Longy. You are the only one here who says majority but means minority. You are the only one pretending to divine a single issue mandate from an election outcome.


so says the hypocrite who happily says that labor has a mandate for a ETS based on what exactly? there was no plebiscite, just a couple elections. you just sunk your own argument.


These are simple points Longy. You were wrong to claim that the majority oppose carbon pricing. You were wrong about a minority being a majority. I am happy to discuss mandates with you. I even started a new thread explaining my views on mandates and challenging yours. You ran away when it emerged that you think a minority is a majority. Obviously it is hard to have a sensible discussion about what a mandate is with someone who does not understand what a majority is and who happily makes clearly false claims about public support for carbon pricing then shifts the goal posts when he is called out on it. There is no need to restart that debate from the beginning. We can skip straight to the point where you explain in what universe a minority can be called a majority and hence a mandate.


it is a bit hard to have a coherent debate with you, you deceitful blockhead. at no point have i ever supported minority rule despite dipsticks like yourself praising Gillards MINORITY government. The hypocrisy you present at times is breath taking. even now you think people don't oppose a carbon tax. they do and there are polls to prove the point. you think people know the difference between a CT and ETS. they dont. you presume those that do know the difference actualyl care. They dont.

You are just an angry little greens supporters smarting from the knowledge that the HATED carbon tax is doomed for repeal and your pitifully inadequate party is headed for the obscurity that always afflicts minor irrelevances like the Greens.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Labor to repeal the Carbon Tax?
Reply #269 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 4:00pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 2:48pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:07pm:
freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 11:08am:
longweekend58 wrote on Apr 10th, 2013 at 9:35am:
freediver wrote on Apr 9th, 2013 at 5:28pm:
Quote:
this CT/ETS argument is a furphy. virtually nobody distinguishes between them out there in voter land


I do. So does Tony Abbott. So does every Australian who objects to Julia Gillard choosing a carbon tax despite her promise to put a price on carbon without a tax. All the people banging their heads in frustration at the inability to negotiate an international ETS are starting to realise how much simpler a tax would be. It would require no agreement between nations other than a minimum level for the local tax. There are several organisations out there promoting a carbon tax.

Quote:
claiming that labor has a mandate now for apolicy they took the opposiite of to the elction and which is rejected by a wide margin of voters


I challenge you to put a rational argument together for what the mandate of the last election outcome was, without resorting to insisting you know what voters really want. You have tried, but every step of the way you merely highlight your own hypocrisy. You laughably resorted to redefining majority to mean minority. So that you could claim a majority and thus a mandate.


If you were even remotely right in your biased thinking then Juliar's polls wouldnt be so parlous. the 2:1 majority AGAINST the CT wouldnt exists.  however both are true and your love of the CT is not reflectied in the comuntity as much as you might want it to.


Shifting the goal posts again eh Longy? A mandate is a majority which can be a minority if you agree with it. And a majority opposed to carbon pricing suddenly only becomes about a carbon tax and the politics around it, because you insist that people can't tell the difference between a tax and an ETS. Is this your way of admitting you were wrong? You seem to do an aweful lot of insisting that other people can't think for themselves and need you to make up their mind for them, all the while pretending to be about the morals of a democratic mandate.

Quote:
thats a REAL majority, not an FD faux-mjority formed by extrapolating positions on other topics and then pretneding it applies elsewhere.


You are a liar Longy. You are the only one here who says majority but means minority. You are the only one pretending to divine a single issue mandate from an election outcome.


so says the hypocrite who happily says that labor has a mandate for a ETS based on what exactly? there was no plebiscite, just a couple elections. you just sunk your own argument.


These are simple points Longy. You were wrong to claim that the majority oppose carbon pricing. You were wrong about a minority being a majority. I am happy to discuss mandates with you. I even started a new thread explaining my views on mandates and challenging yours. You ran away when it emerged that you think a minority is a majority. Obviously it is hard to have a sensible discussion about what a mandate is with someone who does not understand what a majority is and who happily makes clearly false claims about public support for carbon pricing then shifts the goal posts when he is called out on it. There is no need to restart that debate from the beginning. We can skip straight to the point where you explain in what universe a minority can be called a majority and hence a mandate.


its a bit hard to take you seriously when the ultimate test of majority opinion - a plebiscite of all voters - is not taken seriously by you. it doesnt get any more accurate than that but you reject it. And of course you do. Because ironically, the one who supports rule by the minority is YOU.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 
Send Topic Print