Yadda wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2013 at 2:34pm:
Grey wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2013 at 2:06pm:
Well I've made it clear that Anarchism is anti revolution as such. And it certainly has not time for Marxism. Making blueprints for human society is just plain sillyness. It's predicting the patterns caused by flushing while pissing in the bowl.
Get the structure for co-operation right. A structure that allows for all viewpoints to be seen and heard, then you're getting somewhere.
grey,
In mankind's history, has there ever been a community [or society] based upon the 'Anarchism' version that you would aspire to see established ?
Yes and no, any Anarchist collective is free to make up its own rules. Anarchism is purely about structure. Frankly if that structure were to be used throughout Australia tomorrow, I think the immediate effect would be a lurch to the right.
But that doesn't matter to me. Because my belief is that the structure would enable society to progress in a logical and sustainable manner from that point on.
I would urge you to read 'Homage to Catalonia' - George Orwell. Orwell was very much the product of a British upper middle class. But he took a bullet in the neck for Anarchy, very nearly dieing obviously, but was still willing to rejoin his militia comrades on recovery. His impressions were, -
“There was much in it that I did not understand, in some ways I did not even like it, but I recognized it immediately as a state of affairs worth fighting for.”