longweekend58 wrote on Mar 1
st, 2013 at 10:43am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 1
st, 2013 at 8:56am:
longweekend58 wrote on Mar 1
st, 2013 at 8:48am:
laying fibre is no cheaper than copper. l
I think you'll find that 'LAYING" either costs roughly the same.
However copper would be more expensive than fiber.
longweekend58 wrote on Mar 1
st, 2013 at 8:48am:
In september FTTH ends and FTTN begins
I wouldn't put money on that. granted... it might take until december. but the NBN as it is currently deployed is over. they know it as does everyone else. and FTTN will be put in place at 1/4 the cost and ten years ahead of schedule. A win for everyone.
1/4 of the cost would be 8-10 billion.
10 years ahead of schedule would be 2011.
Like you expected the NBN to be finished by 2011?? every month they fall further behind. they have so far passed 72000 premises out of 12.2million in just over 4 years. not good.
As for the nbn being over - any contracts they enter in to (some until 2015/2015) may have to be fulfilled - unless the coalition want to pay billions in penalties.
If I was Mike Quigley I would sign companies up until the end of the roll out and then watch the coalition try to get out of the contracts.
Thats the advantage of being in govt. you can pass legislation specifically to void contracts like that. Rudd cancelled many Howard contracts. thats the prerogative of being in govt. get used to it!
Unless they have a copper network and a time machine, they won't be able to fulfill this promise.
The copper network which they will either buy from Telstra is worth about $20 billion.
As for the time frame - fttn could be finished by 2019 - wow a whole 2 years ahead of ftth, with 3/4 of the cost.
wrong again. it will be finished a decade ahead of the NBN at 1/4 the cost. and BTW. the copper is already there!
I wonder what type of speed their promising - maybe I should make a fttn speed bingo card?