Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print
Murdoch and the NBN (Read 8626 times)
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #30 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 10:49am
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 10:44am:
A densely populated area will have the most take-up.
I know some of you seem completely foreign to running a budget - but if you want a programme to have the shortest net pay-back time you roll it out where you will get the most take-up.

You will not get that in the middle of fking nowhere.

They should not have it first because it will carry a loss for longer than is necessary.

Think $$$$$.


Broadband will never reach rural areas with such a policy, which is clearly demonstrated by our pre-NBN days.

This is a case where government must make neccessary infrastructure investments where private ($$$ based) wont happen.

A very similar analogy as roads. Country roads are not economically as useful as city roads, yet we still build them.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #31 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 11:45am
 
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 9:52am:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 9:30am:
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 9:25am:
cods wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 9:04am:
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 8:57am:
Ive been saying for ages that News Ltds opposition to the NBN is based on self interest via it being a threat to foxtels monopoly.





so can Murdoch change the world?? I dont think so.. we are not that easily brainwashed..I dont have pay TV so wouldnt have a clue .


I know you dont have a clue.   But the NBN does two things that are desperately needed in telecommunications in this country:
1) It allows competition in the PayTV market. Currently we have a private monopoly which is a very bad thing for consumers.
2) It finally divides wholesale and retail telecommunications, removing the blockage Telstra (doing both) has caused to slow innovation and investment in the sector.





and it only costs $50BILLION to get more payTV???  marvellous. no wonder you support labor. you obviously cannot concieve of just how much that is.


Obviously  you are trolling, but the NBN is a lot more than pay TV. 

NBN is the only high speed telecommunications proposal that actually treats rural people the same as city people. Im constantly suprised that the nationals are against it.... or are they ?

PayTV providers (more than one in this new wholesale market) will be paying the NBN to use its infrastructure, rather than being shut out of the foxtel infrastructure.   Phone carriers, internet providers will be PAYING to use the NBN.  New interactive services in education, health and sciences will be PAYING to use the NBN. 

This is how the NBN will generate money, generate money to pay for itself and be a lucrative asset, so, in the due course of time a future liberal government can sell it off as a private monopoly which can again screw its customers (like airports), while patting themselves on the back that they produced a surplus.... and so the cycle will begin again.  Grin


One thing you can rely on is a liberal government to take something that was free and cheap and make it exclusive and expensive.


not a single analysts beleives your naivete about the NBN being lucractive. Event he NBNs own optimistic figures make them barely able to cover costs.

and the previous plane for nationwide ADLS2+ treated the rural areas the same as the city and ironically the completion date for that project was 2011... !!!  if not for Rudd, a national broadband network would already be in place and paid for.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #32 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:06pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 11:45am:
and the previous plane for nationwide ADLS2+ treated the rural areas the same as the city and ironically the completion date for that project was 2011... !!!  if not for Rudd, a national broadband network would already be in place and paid for.


ADSL2 is not suitable for two reasons:
1) Is low bandwidth compared to NBN
2) Suffers from severe degredation in performance when distance from exchange to house exceed 1 or 2 km (so not suited to rural)


ADSL2 also uses copper, not fibre, thereby only a stopgap measure at best.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #33 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:26pm
 
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:06pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 11:45am:
and the previous plane for nationwide ADLS2+ treated the rural areas the same as the city and ironically the completion date for that project was 2011... !!!  if not for Rudd, a national broadband network would already be in place and paid for.


ADSL2 is not suitable for two reasons:
1) Is low bandwidth compared to NBN
2) Suffers from severe degredation in performance when distance from exchange to house exceed 1 or 2 km (so not suited to rural)


ADSL2 also uses copper, not fibre, thereby only a stopgap measure at best.


ADSL 2+ bandwidth is identical to the NBNs standard offering.
the rural upgrades included a lot of fibre to nodes that then proived a decent ADSL speed

and it was at a cost of 20% of the NBN and would be finished 2 years ago.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Quantum
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3373
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #34 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:47pm
 
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:06pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 11:45am:
and the previous plane for nationwide ADLS2+ treated the rural areas the same as the city and ironically the completion date for that project was 2011... !!!  if not for Rudd, a national broadband network would already be in place and paid for.


ADSL2 is not suitable for two reasons:
1) Is low bandwidth compared to NBN

2) Suffers from severe degredation in performance when distance from exchange to house exceed 1 or 2 km (so not suited to rural)


ADSL2 also uses copper, not fibre, thereby only a stopgap measure at best.


I used to have Optus cable. I now have Telstra ADSL2. I can't tell the difference between them despite the former being mathematically superior. There are two reasons for this;

1) 99% of my Internet usage is using google, email, youtube, online banking, social media, etc, as well as the background updates that happen such as by Windows, antivirus downloads. In other words, I am never pushing my net connection to the limit. Even if my Internet connection dropped to half speed I would still surf the net without noticing the drop off. ADSL2 is very fast for normal every day Internet usages.
2) 90%+ of my Internet usage these days is done on the laptop or iPad. The Internet speed to my house could increase by a million, it ain't getting to my device any faster than the wifi will let it. I'm willing to bet that an ever growing percentage of people are using the net from wifi devices these days, making out right net speed irrelevant.

How many people in Australia actually need anything faster than ADSL2 or the cable connection they already have?

I want to be clear that this isn't an aggressive negative post bashing the NBN. It is just after all these months of hearing how fast the NBN is I am still failing to see how it will be of any advantage to the greater percentage of the population. Internet speed much like CPU speed was all the rage at the turn of the millenium. These days I don't think most people care as they don't even use what they have to the max anymore.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #35 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:51pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:26pm:
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:06pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 11:45am:
and the previous plane for nationwide ADLS2+ treated the rural areas the same as the city and ironically the completion date for that project was 2011... !!!  if not for Rudd, a national broadband network would already be in place and paid for.


ADSL2 is not suitable for two reasons:
1) Is low bandwidth compared to NBN
2) Suffers from severe degredation in performance when distance from exchange to house exceed 1 or 2 km (so not suited to rural)


ADSL2 also uses copper, not fibre, thereby only a stopgap measure at best.


ADSL 2+ bandwidth is identical to the NBNs standard offering.
the rural upgrades included a lot of fibre to nodes that then proived a decent ADSL speed

and it was at a cost of 20% of the NBN and would be finished 2 years ago.



Ring Telstra & ask a technician how far from a exchange ADSL2 works, not a sales person but a technician.
I live 5.1KLM from exchange & cannot get ADSL2 & I live in the largest non capital city in the country not some outback town.
4KLM is as far as ADSL2 will function on the current network, where as fibre will allow the internet providers to actually provide what they advertise to 100% of customers not just those lucky enough to live within 4 k radius of exchange.

Is it part of the coalitions plan to build an exchange every 4 klm?
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #36 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:55pm
 
Quantum wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:47pm:
How many people in Australia actually need anything faster than ADSL2 or the cable connection they already have?

I want to be clear that this isn't an aggressive negative post bashing the NBN. It is just after all these months of hearing how fast the NBN is I am still failing to see how it will be of any advantage to the greater percentage of the population. Internet speed much like CPU speed was all the rage at the turn of the millenium. These days I don't think most people care as they don't even use what they have to the max anymore.


I think  you'll find that CPU speed is still ramping along very quickly.  Even phones are coming with quad-core processors these days.

ADSL2 (if you are lucky enough to be near an exchange) is good for most surfing activities now, but as you know the data consumed by users increases every year.  What is good now, will not be good enough in 5 to 10 years. In fact, hopelessly outdated by then.
Even now, on cable or ADSL2, watching standard video is still hit and miss. And we have HD video, and 3-D video almost locked out of the IP space due to home connection speeds.

That, really is the tip of the iceburg.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #37 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:56pm
 

Anyway, back on topic, is there anyone here who does not think Murdochs opposition to the NBN is largely driven by its impact on his PayTV monopoly ?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Quantum
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3373
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #38 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 1:16pm
 
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:55pm:
Quantum wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:47pm:
How many people in Australia actually need anything faster than ADSL2 or the cable connection they already have?

I want to be clear that this isn't an aggressive negative post bashing the NBN. It is just after all these months of hearing how fast the NBN is I am still failing to see how it will be of any advantage to the greater percentage of the population. Internet speed much like CPU speed was all the rage at the turn of the millenium. These days I don't think most people care as they don't even use what they have to the max anymore.


I think  you'll find that CPU speed is still ramping along very quickly.  Even phones are coming with quad-core processors these days.


No doubt. But most people don't care. Even an old core 2 will still run windows 8 and the latest office without any problem. There isn't the need to upgrade anymore to use normal everyday software. There isn't the need to update every couple of years like there was in the late 90's. Most people just keep using the old computer as the advantages of new hardware is diminishing for everyday use. Most 5 year old quad cores don't get used to a fraction of their full potential if one is just using it for office work.

Quote:
ADSL2 (if you are lucky enough to be near an exchange) is good for most surfing activities now, but as you know the data consumed by users increases every year.  What is good now, will not be good enough in 5 to 10 years. In fact, hopelessly outdated by then.
Even now, on cable or ADSL2, watching standard video is still hit and miss. And we have HD video, and 3-D video almost locked out of the IP space due to home connection speeds.

That, really is the tip of the iceburg.



Future proofing seems fair enough. But just like how Optus went around Sydney putting up fiber optic cable everywhere in the mid-nineties, would not something similar happen in the future? If the demand is there someone will supply it. Probably not to rural areas, so I can see the need for the NBN (or something like it) there, but the whole country?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #39 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 2:16pm
 
Quantum wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 1:16pm:
Future proofing seems fair enough. But just like how Optus went around Sydney putting up fiber optic cable everywhere in the mid-nineties, would not something similar happen in the future? If the demand is there someone will supply it. Probably not to rural areas, so I can see the need for the NBN (or something like it) there, but the whole country?


Thats the case for the NBN as a government owned independent wholesaler of capacity.   

The problem of Optus in the mid 90's was that it had to duplicate infrastructure because Telstra blocked it out.  Imagine if Vodafone and others had to do the same thing. We'd end up with hundreds of competing lines, maybe even abandoned when obsolete.

NBN, by providing one almost limitless bandwidth solution enables optus/telstra/foxtel/others to concentrate on content and pricing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #40 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 5:44pm
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:51pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:26pm:
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 12:06pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 11:45am:
and the previous plane for nationwide ADLS2+ treated the rural areas the same as the city and ironically the completion date for that project was 2011... !!!  if not for Rudd, a national broadband network would already be in place and paid for.


ADSL2 is not suitable for two reasons:
1) Is low bandwidth compared to NBN
2) Suffers from severe degredation in performance when distance from exchange to house exceed 1 or 2 km (so not suited to rural)


ADSL2 also uses copper, not fibre, thereby only a stopgap measure at best.


ADSL 2+ bandwidth is identical to the NBNs standard offering.
the rural upgrades included a lot of fibre to nodes that then proived a decent ADSL speed

and it was at a cost of 20% of the NBN and would be finished 2 years ago.



Ring Telstra & ask a technician how far from a exchange ADSL2 works, not a sales person but a technician.
I live 5.1KLM from exchange & cannot get ADSL2 & I live in the largest non capital city in the country not some outback town.
4KLM is as far as ADSL2 will function on the current network, where as fibre will allow the internet providers to actually provide what they advertise to 100% of customers not just those lucky enough to live within 4 k radius of exchange.

Is it part of the coalitions plan to build an exchange every 4 klm?



FTTN is fibre to the NODE. the coalitions plan is expansive fiber to many thousands of nodes. and nodes are like those dalek like things u see on the streets already - just there will be more of them.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #41 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 5:47pm
 
Doctor Jolly wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 10:49am:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 10:44am:
A densely populated area will have the most take-up.
I know some of you seem completely foreign to running a budget - but if you want a programme to have the shortest net pay-back time you roll it out where you will get the most take-up.

You will not get that in the middle of fking nowhere.

They should not have it first because it will carry a loss for longer than is necessary.

Think $$$$$.


Broadband will never reach rural areas with such a policy, which is clearly demonstrated by our pre-NBN days.

This is a case where government must make neccessary infrastructure investments where private ($$$ based) wont happen.

A very similar analogy as roads. Country roads are not economically as useful as city roads, yet we still build them.



but we dont build 12-lane freeways do we. we build roads the size they need to be and upgrade as necessary.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #42 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 6:01pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 8:36am:
philperth2010 wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 7:23am:
News Ltd are unfit to operate anywhere IMO......the phone tapping and blatant abuse of power shown by the Murdoch empire shows these people are not concerned with decency and honesty.....Anyone who has been unfortunate enough to watch Fox News know how bias and unreliable there news coverage is.....Tapping the phones of dead people to get a scoop is very low and part of News Ltd SOP....sp@mpert Murdoch does not care about anything but himself and those who do his dirty work for him!!!


Angry Angry Angry


there's plenty of room and time for you 'ethical operators' to startup your own competition networks. of course you'd all just put left-wing spin on it and then pretend you are being even-balanced.

and BTW, the vast majority of australia is right-wing and therefore a right-wing media is quite appropriate.



I have no problem with right wing media.....News Ltd however have sunk to the bottom of the barrel and have spawned a culture that cannot be trusted.....Why am I not surprised you missed the point completely???

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
salad in
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5941
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #43 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 6:45pm
 
John S wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 5:01am:
Why does the Liberal party let one man dictate policy to them.

Murdoch is not even Australian and he doesn't vote here.


Doug Cameron is not Australian yet he sits in our parliament. Nick Bolkus was a Greek citizen yet he was a government minister. It's a bit late to be worried about non-citizens ain't it?
Back to top
 

The ALP, the progressive party, the party of ideas, the workers' friend, is the only Australian political party to roast four young Australians in roof cavities. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch and the NBN
Reply #44 - Feb 28th, 2013 at 6:52pm
 
salad in wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 6:45pm:
John S wrote on Feb 28th, 2013 at 5:01am:
Why does the Liberal party let one man dictate policy to them.

Murdoch is not even Australian and he doesn't vote here.


Doug Cameron is not Australian yet he sits in our parliament. Nick Bolkus was a Greek citizen yet he was a government minister. It's a bit late to be worried about non-citizens ain't it?


Doug Cameron is an Australian citizen and Nick Bolkus was born in Adelaide.....Just so you know!!!

Smiley Smiley Smiley
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print