Leftists doing what leftists do. Silence the opposition in anyway possible.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 8:59am:



It's the threat of violence by Muslim mobs, not 'democratic protest'. By contrast, Christians picket all sorts of movies and events, none of which have been cancelled because nobody thinks that there would be any violence. The worst that ever happens at those pickets is out of tune singing of a dirge or three.

rubbish, both of you.

There is no evidence that there was any threat of violence, nor was there any suggestion that the venue holder was the subject of intimidation. All the article mentions is the host was " scared by the possibility of anti-democratic fringe groups holding a protest outside."

Interpretation: the venue holder doesn't want to be the subject of bad publicity and scrutiny over why they thought it was a good idea to host a world-renowned bigot and hate monger.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 9:25am:


Pathetic, and you know it.

An unnamed four-star CBD hotel had been set to host Wilders but pulled out late on Tuesday.



I wonder what changed overnight.  The hotel only just learned who he was?

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 10:11am:


If Muslims made up close to or over 50% of the population, it would no longer resemble anything like a democracy. Do you think they'll vote for a liberal democratic candidate over an Islamic one? No they won't. And when they vote Islamic candidates in the country will start to resemble one of the backwaters of the Middle east. Submission to Allah will trump political pragmatism.

I am not hypocritical on this, my position is clear. I will not tolerate any Islamic influence in politics, nor any of the extreme leftist views like you find on university campuses and in the Greens.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20^th, 2013 at 10:11am:



You, like every other Muslim, simply want to silence criticism of Islam. That's why Muslims kill people over cartoons, youtube vids, books.
Muslims need to do this a few times only to get everyone scared about making critical remarks about Islam in public or private.


Here's what Mark Stey said about Lars Hegedaraard whom Muslims tried to kill recently, in Denmark, for something he said in private in his own flat:

I received a couple of emails from prominent persons saying wasn't I a bit worried that some of the people here are a bit controversial and it might not be a good idea to be seen in the same room as them. And that's a fair point. Obviously, it would be far safer for one's reputation to appear in the same room as less controversial figures such as the chaps appearing last weekend at the Muslim Council of Calgary's big event in Alberta. Their keynote speaker was the Saudi-educated imam Dr Bilal Phillips, who's on record as saying that every male homosexual should be executed. He later clarified his position: He only wants all male homosexuals in Muslim countries executed. "The media tends to take my words out of context," he said.

Also on the bill was the moderate Muslim Shaykh Hatem Alhaj, who supports the introduction of female genital mutilation to North America. But he's a "moderate" Muslim because he only believes in nicking the clitoris rather than slicing the thing right off. So the head of the Calgary Police Diversity Unit and multiple representatives of the Canadian state had no problem whatsoever being in the same room as Messrs Alhaj and Phillips.

There is literally nothing a prominent Muslim can say – about gays, about Jews, about women – that would render him persona non grata. That's the world we live in: sharing a stage with a man calling for compulsory execution for homosexuals isn't controversial; sharing a stage with Lars Hedegaard is."

He could have said it about Wilders.

The speech should have gone ahead regardless of the catalyst involved to halt the event.

It's a real kick in the guts to all of our past and present soldiers who think/thought that they were upholding something in this country.

Weak as piss is what it is