greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13
th, 2013 at 3:26pm:
gold_medal wrote on Jan 13
th, 2013 at 3:17pm:
Theories with convincing evidence dont need to appeal to consensus; they stand on their merits.
That's correct.
The AGW hypothesis has no credible convincing evidence and as such the followers of this religion constantly resort to nonsense such as "consensus", irrational fear-mongering, hyperbole, data manipulation, and outright lies.
If they just ignored all the BS and looked at the science they'd soon realise exactly how weak their hypothesis actually is.
You do realize your musings on this topic
support climate change, don’t you, Greggery? You just repeat the same thing again and again. Even Alan gets creative once in a while.
Each post from Rabbito and Muso defeats your blurb every time they contribute something to this discussion. Even Death gets the better of you.
I apologise profusely if you’re parodying the denialists. If you are, you’re spot on. I’d just whack the odd Alan quote in to legitimise your position. Soren does a good job at this.
I must say, I love the call to science and reason - classic denialist tactic. Good job.