greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14
th, 2013 at 9:03pm:
I don't: I've always said that the evidence exists.
Now you're just telling lies.
Really Greggery!!!!
You have always said that the evidence exists!!!!
Have you?!?!
Funny - you seemed to sat the exact opposite just a few pages ago!:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13
th, 2013 at 3:26pm:
The AGW hypothesis has no credible convincing evidence and as such the followers of this religion constantly resort to nonsense such as "consensus", irrational fear-mongering, hyperbole, data manipulation, and outright lies.
Why do you consider the evidence that supports gravity to be credible and convincing, but not the evidence that supports AGW?
Could you explain to us what is not credible or convincing about the evidence that suppports AGW.?
Start with stratospheric cooling
Why is this evidence neither credible nor convincing?
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14
th, 2013 at 9:03pm:
There's no way anything you say from now on can be taken seriously.
I was just thinking the same thing Greggery.