matty
Gold Member
   
Offline

Australian Politics
Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender:
|
John Smith wrote on Dec 15 th, 2012 at 8:53am: matty wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 11:01pm: Kat wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 10:57pm: matty wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 10:13pm: John Smith wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 9:46pm: matty wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 9:25pm: John Smith wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 9:12pm: matty wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 8:06pm: John Smith wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 7:59pm: matty wrote on Dec 14 th, 2012 at 7:14pm: I am sick of hearing people say that young people, as a collective, vote Labor/Green. It's simply not true. I am 22, a staunch Conservative, and have been since I was 8. You do get a lot of young, bigoted, bleeding heart lefties who shove their gay marriage/asylum seeker nonsense down your throat, and try to silence and drown out those of conflicting opinions. They give the rest of us a bad name.
IMO, Labor has no values and integrity. All that they want is power, and thankfully it's coming to an end soon. after the libs just got caught trying to circumvent democracy you want to try and play the values and integrity card? Which Libs? To what exactly are you referring? Ashby and Brough for starters ... Hockey is in there somewhere but he's that thick he has no idea whats happening around him , he may very well be an unintentional pawn in all this, and I'd be surprised if Abbott doesn't tie into it somehow ..... Brough wouldn't start something like this without the knowledge he had the liberal parties support ... Prove it. Well Ashby and Brough were mentioned in the judgement as being involved in this little scandal ... Hockey and Pyne (missed him earlier) have admitted having dealings in it, and Abbott, well, his answers don't add up ... call it an educated guess .... you really need to pull your head out of the sand. I'd suggest you re-read the judgement ... Show me the proof that Hockey, Pyne and/or Abbott were involved in a campaign to bring down the govt, as is being alleged. Sounds to me like conjecture, and, as such, requires no proof. You can't claim that Abbott and others were involved if you have no proof. I am sure that you would have said the same about Gillard... Why not? You've been claiming for months that Gillard ripped off union funds and have yet to provide proof .... at least my conjecture is feasible .... you've had 20 yrs to try and prove your theory and not been able to find anything ... early days early days ... we've still to see the outcome of this little episode Show me a single post where I said that.
|