Yadda wrote on Dec 8^th, 2012 at 9:29am:


right, so just to be clear - in Yadda world, muslims spend half their time proudly demonstrating to the world that they are justified in killing critics of islam and the prophet - through the example of their prophet, and half their time trying to convince the world that those very prophetic examples are in fact not reflective of the true islam.

I should hand it to you Yadda - your position is completely fool-proof - if muslims are shown to be rioting and calling for the beheading of critics, its merely muslims "showing their true colours" - but when they go the other way and try and convince the world that such rioting is in fact NOT sanctioned by islam, they are merely being duplicitous. So there is literally nothing muslims can do to redeem themselves. Brilliant.

Yadda wrote on Dec 8^th, 2012 at 7:16pm:


Still a little hard for you to grasp? Maybe if you weren't so obsessed with misquoting the quran and spamming each and every post with historically unverified biographical accounts of the prophet, you might have a better chance.

But to put it REALLY simply for you...

1. you view muslims as rioting and murderous thugs - and they are like this because they are merely following the example of the prophet and the orders given to them in the quran. Furthermore, they actively promote this behaviour as being essential to being a good muslim.

2. Paradoxically, while promoting and justifying the above behaviour, they somehow also try and discredit and reject the accounts that portray Mohammad as displaying the above mentioned qualities (ie murderer and terrorist) - and inexplicably attempt to paint the prophet as tolerant and opposed to the same thugish behaviour described above.

So what are we yadda? 1 or 2? We can't be both - if we're 1, then we're terrorists, and proud of it - and we certainly wouldn't want to promote anything other than a terrorist-loving prophet. But if its 2, then we are presumably arguing for a tolerant and peaceful islam - and would reject the behaviour described in 1.

Hint: this is not a debate about how big a liars muslims are - the point is if they hold both 1 and 2, they are defeating their own arguments. Muslims may be lying or being deceptive, but it only works if they are deceptive about one of them - attempting both doesn't work.

nevermind Yadda. Addressing an actual argument is apparently too much for you.

As you were - continue on with your spamming...

Let me break it down for you ItsAllAboutMe...

My argument is about the logical inconsistency of Yadda's argument - *NOT* whether or not the message of islam is right or wrong.

And to repeat this logical inconsistency once again, he posts pictures of bloodthirsty rioters demanding the blood of "infidels" - since they are merely proudly carrying out the example of the prophet, while on the other hand claims that muslims try to be deceptive by hiding the truth of the prophet (ie by attempting to refute the authenticity of accounts that portray the prophet as intolerant and bloodthirsty).

The point is, such contradictory behaviour is nonsensical from Yadda's own point of view. If muslims are bloodthirsty and proud, then they wouldn't be trying to refute the bloodthirsty accounts of the prophet.

Thus when Yadda can only respond with:

Yadda wrote on Dec 9^th, 2012 at 10:17pm:


He clearly cannot grasp the point, and it is therefore futile to carry on.