Australian Politics Forum - CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature Reply #30 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 3:53pm greggery doesn't know what a "standard deviation" is!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #31 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:40pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 3:26pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 18^th, 2012 at 11:13pm:

What is the significance of "16 years"
.

When it comes to climate change, absolutely none, yet YOU are the one who quoted it.

LOL Grin

Search your posts bunny boy.

*EDIT:

Hey bunny boy, Don't worry about searching - here it is:

"You have been constantly repeating the lie that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/51#51

We're talking about global climate change, and you're obsessed with "16 years".

If you want to talk about the weather, go to a mothers' playgroup meeting.

I think you need to talk to progressivelol about the "16 years".

It is his obsession.

You would get on well with him. He is like you.
He also makes silly statements and then runs away when asked to explain them.

Perhaps you might like to explain to us now why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining how much atmospheric cO2 is anthropogenic in origin? You asked for evidence about a particular point - (http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/75) - you were shown it - and now you just run away when asjked to explain why you think it is not "credible"

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156156
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #32 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:50pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 3:26pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 18^th, 2012 at 11:13pm:

What is the significance of "16 years"
.

When it comes to climate change, absolutely none, yet YOU are the one who quoted it.

LOL Grin

Search your posts bunny boy.

*EDIT:

Hey bunny boy, Don't worry about searching - here it is:

"You have been constantly repeating the lie that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/51#51

We're talking about global climate change, and you're obsessed with "16 years".

If you want to talk about the weather, go to a mothers' playgroup meeting.

I think you need to talk to progressivelol about the "16 years".

It is his obsession.

You mentioned it four times in one post. Twice in one sentence.

It's clear who's obsessed with such short periods of time.

Perhaps this would be more suited to your needs:

http://9juniorweatherwatch.com.au/

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #33 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 7:04pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 3:26pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 18^th, 2012 at 11:13pm:

What is the significance of "16 years"
.

When it comes to climate change, absolutely none, yet YOU are the one who quoted it.

LOL Grin

Search your posts bunny boy.

*EDIT:

Hey bunny boy, Don't worry about searching - here it is:

"You have been constantly repeating the lie that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/51#51

We're talking about global climate change, and you're obsessed with "16 years".

If you want to talk about the weather, go to a mothers' playgroup meeting.

I think you need to talk to progressivelol about the "16 years".

It is his obsession.

You mentioned it four times in one post. Twice in one sentence.

It's clear who's obsessed with such short periods of time.

Perhaps this would be more suited to your needs:

http://9juniorweatherwatch.com.au/

Yes - progressiveslol likes to continually post the lie that the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

He has been repeatedly asked the questions:
"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

But he does not answer. He just runs away

Just like you do.

Just like you are trying to do now.

ou asked for evidence about a that the majority of the increase in atmospheric CO2 is from anthropogenic sources- (http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/75) - you were shown evidence of this.

You claimed the evidence was not "credible"

Could you please explain why? Please explain to us now why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining how much atmospheric cO2 is anthropogenic in origin?

You don't want to get the reputation of being a liar do you - like progressiveslol?

Why can't you explain the statements you have made?

Will you just run away again now? Try to change the subject again?
Why don't you grow up and answer the question. Explain the statements you have made.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #34 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:09pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 7:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 3:26pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 18^th, 2012 at 11:13pm:

What is the significance of "16 years"
.

When it comes to climate change, absolutely none, yet YOU are the one who quoted it.

LOL Grin

Search your posts bunny boy.

*EDIT:

Hey bunny boy, Don't worry about searching - here it is:

"You have been constantly repeating the lie that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/51#51

We're talking about global climate change, and you're obsessed with "16 years".

If you want to talk about the weather, go to a mothers' playgroup meeting.

I think you need to talk to progressivelol about the "16 years".

It is his obsession.

You mentioned it four times in one post. Twice in one sentence.

It's clear who's obsessed with such short periods of time.

Perhaps this would be more suited to your needs:

http://9juniorweatherwatch.com.au/

Yes - progressiveslol likes to continually post the lie that the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

He has been repeatedly asked the questions:
"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

But he does not answer. He just runs away

Just like you do.

Just like you are trying to do now.

ou asked for evidence about a that the majority of the increase in atmospheric CO2 is from anthropogenic sources- (http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/75) - you were shown evidence of this.

You claimed the evidence was not "credible"

Could you please explain why? Please explain to us now why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining how much atmospheric cO2 is anthropogenic in origin?

You don't want to get the reputation of being a liar do you - like progressiveslol?

Why can't you explain the statements you have made?

Will you just run away again now? Try to change the subject again?
Why don't you grow up and answer the question. Explain the statements you have made.

Dont have to think about it, just read it and weap as you have been doing. MET's empirical data shows 0.5 degrees over norm 16 years ago, with the same 0.5 degrees over norm today.

I dont think 16 years is significant.Close though. 17 years maybe because climate scientists have said 17 years is enough for a trend.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:20pm by progressiveslol »

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #35 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:36pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

Dont have to think about it, just read it and weap as you have been doing. MET's empirical data shows 0.5 degrees over norm 16 years ago, with the same 0.5 degrees over norm today.

I dont think 16 years is significant.Close though. 17 years maybe because climate scientists have said 17 years is enough for a trend.

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Don't run away again Progs. Answer the question. After all, you even have poor old fools like Greggery repeating your nonsense now.

Simple question:
Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #36 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:42pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:36pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

Dont have to think about it, just read it and weap as you have been doing. MET's empirical data shows 0.5 degrees over norm 16 years ago, with the same 0.5 degrees over norm today.

I dont think 16 years is significant.Close though. 17 years maybe because climate scientists have said 17 years is enough for a trend.

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Don't run away again Progs. Answer the question. After all, you even have poor old fools like Greggery repeating your nonsense now.

Simple question:
Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

0.5 equals 0.5

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #37 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:46pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:42pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:36pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

Dont have to think about it, just read it and weap as you have been doing. MET's empirical data shows 0.5 degrees over norm 16 years ago, with the same 0.5 degrees over norm today.

I dont think 16 years is significant.Close though. 17 years maybe because climate scientists have said 17 years is enough for a trend.

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Don't run away again Progs. Answer the question. After all, you even have poor old fools like Greggery repeating your nonsense now.

Simple question:
Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

0.5 equals 0.5

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Answer the question Progs.

Show us how smart you are.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #38 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:56pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:46pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:42pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:36pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

Dont have to think about it, just read it and weap as you have been doing. MET's empirical data shows 0.5 degrees over norm 16 years ago, with the same 0.5 degrees over norm today.

I dont think 16 years is significant.Close though. 17 years maybe because climate scientists have said 17 years is enough for a trend.

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Don't run away again Progs. Answer the question. After all, you even have poor old fools like Greggery repeating your nonsense now.

Simple question:
Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

0.5 equals 0.5

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Answer the question Progs.

Show us how smart you are.

Well you would have to provide your evidence first. God knows where you get the information. Probably that crap site skepticalscience. I would need to know what you are on about before considering answering. Then I would need to consider if i should be bothered.

BTW can you answer how you cant figure out that 0.5 equals 0.5

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #39 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 9:10pm

Oh no, the MET office does it again.

Now they are saying the global temperature has actually fallen slightly in the last 2 years. Put that in the 16years of no growth in temperature and now it becomes no growth in temps and a small decrease in 16 years.

Bloody ell I hate being the barer of bad news.

http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/2012/11/agenda-driven-met-offices-grudgi...

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 19^th, 2012 at 9:40pm by progressiveslol »

IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature Reply #40 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 9:46pm Cool spell to chill hearts of climate activists http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/cool-spell-to-chill-hearts-o...
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156156
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #41 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 9:51pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 7:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 3:26pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 18^th, 2012 at 11:13pm:

What is the significance of "16 years"
.

When it comes to climate change, absolutely none, yet YOU are the one who quoted it.

LOL Grin

Search your posts bunny boy.

*EDIT:

Hey bunny boy, Don't worry about searching - here it is:

"You have been constantly repeating the lie that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/51#51

We're talking about global climate change, and you're obsessed with "16 years".

If you want to talk about the weather, go to a mothers' playgroup meeting.

I think you need to talk to progressivelol about the "16 years".

It is his obsession.

You mentioned it four times in one post. Twice in one sentence.

It's clear who's obsessed with such short periods of time.

Perhaps this would be more suited to your needs:

http://9juniorweatherwatch.com.au/

Yes - progressiveslol likes to continually post the lie that the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

He has been repeatedly asked the questions:
"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

Again with the "16 years".

You have absolutely no idea what the difference is between 'weather' and 'climate', do you?

I don't know why I waste my time discussing this with you.

Roll Eyes

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #42 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 10:48pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:56pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:46pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:42pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:36pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

Dont have to think about it, just read it and weap as you have been doing. MET's empirical data shows 0.5 degrees over norm 16 years ago, with the same 0.5 degrees over norm today.

I dont think 16 years is significant.Close though. 17 years maybe because climate scientists have said 17 years is enough for a trend.

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Don't run away again Progs. Answer the question. After all, you even have poor old fools like Greggery repeating your nonsense now.

Simple question:
Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

0.5 equals 0.5

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Answer the question Progs.

Show us how smart you are.

Well you would have to provide your evidence first. God knows where you get the information. Probably that crap site skepticalscience. I would need to know what you are on about before considering answering. Then I would need to consider if i should be bothered.

BTW can you answer how you cant figure out that 0.5 equals 0.5

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Answer the question Progs.

Show us how smart you are.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #43 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 10:51pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 7:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 6:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 3:26pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 18^th, 2012 at 11:13pm:

What is the significance of "16 years"
.

When it comes to climate change, absolutely none, yet YOU are the one who quoted it.

LOL Grin

Search your posts bunny boy.

*EDIT:

Hey bunny boy, Don't worry about searching - here it is:

"You have been constantly repeating the lie that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/51#51

We're talking about global climate change, and you're obsessed with "16 years".

If you want to talk about the weather, go to a mothers' playgroup meeting.

I think you need to talk to progressivelol about the "16 years".

It is his obsession.

You mentioned it four times in one post. Twice in one sentence.

It's clear who's obsessed with such short periods of time.

Perhaps this would be more suited to your needs:

http://9juniorweatherwatch.com.au/

Yes - progressiveslol likes to continually post the lie that the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

He has been repeatedly asked the questions:
"Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

"How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years?"

Again with the "16 years".

You have absolutely no idea what the difference is between 'weather' and 'climate', do you?

I don't know why I waste my time discussing this with you.

Roll Eyes

You are not discussing anything with anybody. You are an ignorant old man who tells lies and then runs away like a little girl when asked to explain his lies.

Let's try again shall we?

Perhaps you might like to explain to us now why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining how much atmospheric cO2 is anthropogenic in origin? You asked for evidence about a particular point - (http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1352071339/75) - you were shown it - and now you just run away when asjked to explain why you think it is not "credible"

Man up Greggery.
Don't keep running away.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156156
Gender: male

Re: CATALYST - Taking Our Temperature
Reply #44 - Nov 19^th, 2012 at 10:54pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 19^th, 2012 at 10:48pm:

Why is the arctic ice cap shrinking, global glacial mass balance decreasing, sea levels rising and ocean temperatures increasing if the earth has not been warming for 16 years?

How is it you think that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years when the global temperature anomaly to the long term average has been positive for every one of those 16 years

Tell us one more time, who has the obsession with "16 years"? Roll Eyes

Come back when you want to talk about climate change.

If you want to discuss the weather, go visit your Gran.

Off you hop.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged