Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 14
th, 2012 at 10:22am:
It was a stupid answer. Testosterone isn't needed to run a nation let alone a corporation.
1 dimensional thinking there Annie - 1/10.
Quote:Male testosterone linked to high social dominance but low physical aggression in early adolescence.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8885586 Quote:A University of Cambridge study showed a male’s trader daily Testosterone is higher on the days when he makes more money than he would in an average day.
Also the higher a trader’s testosterone level in the morning, the more likely it is he’ll make more money at the end of the day than his low- testosterone colleagues.
Testosterone makes you feel invincible so you start to take bigger risks in hopes of bigger rewards.
This is all due to a phenomenon called ‘’The Winner Effect’’. Researchers have been studying the winner effect observing animals for more than a decade. In animals, success at any given task triggers a boost in testosterone levels, which in turn triggers a number of changes in the brain. Animals under the effects of T make decisions faster, are more willing to take risks and try harder to win.
The same has been examined in human male athletes, with the same results: When you win you release more testosterone, which increases your chances of succeeding the next time around.
http://sacrededenblog.com/your-path-to-success-high-t-high-profits/If you google "testosterone linked to wealth/health/success/dominance" you'll get millions of results. Seem like pretty handy advantages to have if you want to get to the top, don't they? Estrogen isn't terribly useful for this goal.
Quote:The answer is that there is a lack of balance due to age. The women who are more educated are mostly younger with less experience. With the next generation the balance of power will shift and it will continue to do so.
True. At least until the artficial "leg ups" to women and barriers to men end.
Quote:For what it's worth, I don't believe gender quotas in the workplace are helpful, but there needs to be a change to ensure that women receive the same benefits in their careers as men - salaries etc.
What kind of change? Women overall aren't as interested in high power, high risk, high reward roles. For those who are, I say go for it, but lets not fall into the trap of imagining that what men and women want, or how they measure success are identical.