Doctor Jolly wrote on Nov 28
th, 2012 at 12:41pm:
FriYAY wrote on Nov 27
th, 2012 at 11:36am:
Doctor Jolly wrote on Nov 27
th, 2012 at 11:25am:
Says more about our average bowling attack, and useless spinner.
But, in hindsight, could SA have won it. Should they have chased down the total ?
LOL
Lyon 3-49 off 50 overs in an attack that lost it’s key strike weapon.
What a moronic statement you make.
You know about cricket as much as you know about most things. Bugger all.
On the 5th day, the spinner is the key strike weapon. Three wickets in a day and a half. 0.75 wickets per session. Ordinary to say the least.
At that rate he'd take 13 sessions, over 4 days to bowl them out. Who is the moron now ?
You, still. Basing so much on one innings is as moronic as it gets.
He’s new to the game, playing against the world #1 team, that was playing for a draw, on the #1 batting strip in Australia. It’s not just about your silly little opinion.
It’s about the opposition.
The state of the game.
The wicket.
51 wickets @ 29.13 in his first 15 tests is an excellent start for an off spinner.
Want to compare a few “still the moron”? Nathan Hauritz 63 @ 35 – Krejza 13 @ 43 – How about the great NZ spinner Daniel Vittori? 359 @ 34.
So tell me “still the moron” which current spinner should be in the team?
Do you have an opinion out side of your calculator?
Have I owned your stupid arse enough?
Yep, you’re “still the moron”.
Forum
Pages: 
