|
sir prince duke alevine
|
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 3:49pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 3:42pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 3:38pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 3:34pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 3:32pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 3:07pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 3:03pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4 th, 2012 at 2:48pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3 rd, 2012 at 11:22pm: Progressives, can you please explain rolling average to me. It will help me to understand the point your talking about. Perhaps you could draw a graph with what the rolling average should be? google is your friend. Then when you are ready, you can tell me what you have an issue with. So you have no.idea? progs, progs, progs ....... I can't leave you alone for a few hours to do my shopping without you making yourself look like an idiot again .... can I suggest you stay away from google ... reading something is not the same as understanding it , in your case, the less you read on google the smarter you'll look. nice try fool. But if you and alevine have a question, then ask it. Trying to get me to do something for your reverse logic, will not happen. But I already asked you a question and again you get back into your little hole.  Fact is I looked at Nova's blog for this one and yes the graph does look incredibly peculiar. But with the same breath the revised information suggesting 1 degree increase in 50 years is enough for me to continue saying, "Thank you Nova for clearing this one up, now move on." You however don't seem to even know what a rolling average is!!!! It's disgraceful how much you have fallen into the climate change denier group think. Back to your hole. Funny how you just make stuff up with your activist group think. Back to your indoctrination camp.  And then you ignore what I just said above.  What a nut. Seriously, back to your hole. And learn what a rolling average is, nut.
|