Australian Politics Forum - Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #60 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:20am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.

What lie. I only see a question to you.

Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase .

I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ...

Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR

I got to have my fun.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #61 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am

wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here...

its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it..

I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes..

come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums...

WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT????????

THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL..

THATS A FIRST. Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #62 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:31am

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here...

its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it..

I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes..

come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums...

WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT????????

THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL..

THATS A FIRST. Cheesy

I see comprehension is not your strong point ...we are asking to see the documents that progs claims exist ... how does he know what does and doesn't exist if he hasn't seen it?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Reply #63 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:32am Wow talk about thicker than dog sh it, if Bishop was waving anything of significance around it would have been printed in the NEWS LMD arm of the Liberal party. But even those losers are not touching this crap.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #64 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:32am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:20am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.

What lie. I only see a question to you.

Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase .

I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ...

Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR

I got to have my fun.

you mean you were shitting yourself trying to find an out, when Cods kindly handed you one ... the fact that it in no way looks like a question and she was wrong is beside the point, you still grabbed it and ran with it.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

lisa.greek

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1595
Cairns QLD

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #65 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:33am

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here...

its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it..

I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes..

come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums...

WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT????????

THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL..

THATS A FIRST. Cheesy

Maybe it was another whining old pensioner' s subsidised electricity bill that bishop was trying to table to show the old biddie had suffered a price increase of nearly a 100% due to the carbon pricing scheme. third time lucky?

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #66 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:35am

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:32am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:20am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.

What lie. I only see a question to you.

Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase .

I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ...

Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR

I got to have my fun.

you mean you were shitting yourself trying to find an out, when Cods kindly handed you one ... the fact that it in no way looks like a question and she was wrong is beside the point, you still grabbed it and ran with it.

Yeh, thats why I never ran. lol

Cool

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #67 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:36am

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here...

its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it..

I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes..

come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums...

WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT????????

THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL..

THATS A FIRST. Cheesy

WHEN WILL YOU COMPHREHEND THAT IF BISHOP HAS EVIDENCE SHE SHOULD SUBMIT IT TO THE POLICE? LYNCH MOBS ARE NOT THE AUTHORITY IN THIS COUNTRY. TOMATOES. HORSES.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #68 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:37am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:35am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:32am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:20am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.

What lie. I only see a question to you.

Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase .

I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ...

Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR

I got to have my fun.

you mean you were shitting yourself trying to find an out, when Cods kindly handed you one ... the fact that it in no way looks like a question and she was wrong is beside the point, you still grabbed it and ran with it.

Yeh, thats why I never ran. lol

Cool

no? you just cowered under the desk perhaps?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #69 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:37am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:35am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:32am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:20am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.

What lie. I only see a question to you.

Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase .

I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ...

Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR

I got to have my fun.

you mean you were shitting yourself trying to find an out, when Cods kindly handed you one ... the fact that it in no way looks like a question and she was wrong is beside the point, you still grabbed it and ran with it.

Yeh, thats why I never ran. lol

Cool

Ok so then you can provide the documentation.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #70 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:37am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:36am:

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here...

its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it..

I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes..

come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums...

WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT????????

THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL..

THATS A FIRST. Cheesy

WHEN WILL YOU COMPHREHEND THAT IF BISHOP HAS EVIDENCE SHE SHOULD SUBMIT IT TO THE POLICE? LYNCH MOBS ARE NOT THE AUTHORITY IN THIS COUNTRY. TOMATOES. HORSES.

She is showing respect for the PM to have Gillard clear up the matter before Bishop hands it off to the police.

Full circle, well done.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #71 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:38am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:37am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:35am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:32am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:20am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.

What lie. I only see a question to you.

Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase .

I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ...

Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR

I got to have my fun.

you mean you were shitting yourself trying to find an out, when Cods kindly handed you one ... the fact that it in no way looks like a question and she was wrong is beside the point, you still grabbed it and ran with it.

Yeh, thats why I never ran. lol

Cool

Ok so then you can provide the documentation.

You will need to be more specific. What documentation are you after?

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #72 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:39am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:37am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:36am:

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here...

its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it..

I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes..

come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums...

WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT????????

THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL..

THATS A FIRST. Cheesy

WHEN WILL YOU COMPHREHEND THAT IF BISHOP HAS EVIDENCE SHE SHOULD SUBMIT IT TO THE POLICE? LYNCH MOBS ARE NOT THE AUTHORITY IN THIS COUNTRY. TOMATOES. HORSES.

She is showing respect for the PM to have Gillard clear up the matter before Bishop hands it off to the police.

Full circle, well done.

Less dribbling nonsense and speaking on behalf of bishop, more providing documentation you claim you've seen.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #73 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:41am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:37am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:36am:

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here...

its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it..

I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes..

come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums...

WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT????????

THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL..

THATS A FIRST. Cheesy

WHEN WILL YOU COMPHREHEND THAT IF BISHOP HAS EVIDENCE SHE SHOULD SUBMIT IT TO THE POLICE? LYNCH MOBS ARE NOT THE AUTHORITY IN THIS COUNTRY. TOMATOES. HORSES.

She is showing respect for the PM to have Gillard clear up the matter before Bishop hands it off to the police.

At this point I would call you an idiot, but that would be an injustice to the idiots out there ....

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #74 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:41am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:38am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:37am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:35am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:32am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:20am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:19am:

Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.

What lie. I only see a question to you.

Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase .

I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ...

Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR

I got to have my fun.

you mean you were shitting yourself trying to find an out, when Cods kindly handed you one ... the fact that it in no way looks like a question and she was wrong is beside the point, you still grabbed it and ran with it.

Yeh, thats why I never ran. lol

Cool

Ok so then you can provide the documentation.

You will need to be more specific. What documentation are you after?

The documentation you've sighted that proves gillards guilt.

Try a you want,liar, but your last bit of dignity and credibility has gone.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged