Australian Politics Forum - Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #105 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:02pm

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

Well that is true. Now if we can only figure out which documents they are referring to exactly.

Maybe we can petition labor to allow all the gillard awu documents.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #106 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:11pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:02pm:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

Well that is true. Now if we can only figure out which documents they are referring to exactly.

Maybe we can petition labor to allow all the gillard awu documents.

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:29am:

Is that what was on the documentation that gillard signed and is available for all to see.

What is the documentation that gillard signed and is available for all to see?!?!?

Please tell us, or apologise for telling lies.

Show us the documentation that "gillard signed and is available for all to see"

I smell pants on fire.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #107 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:16pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:11pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:02pm:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

Well that is true. Now if we can only figure out which documents they are referring to exactly.

Maybe we can petition labor to allow all the gillard awu documents.

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:29am:

Is that what was on the documentation that gillard signed and is available for all to see.

What is the documentation that gillard signed and is available for all to see?!?!?

Please tell us, or apologise for telling lies.

Show us the documentation that "gillard signed and is available for all to see"

I smell pants on fire.

lol that pants on fire is sooo you.

You are too late and too far out of it. I have offered to answer but with a request for 2 quotes. I didnt get it, so you dont get the answer.

I am done with the game of the day.

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Reply #108 - Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm: Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #109 - Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:53am

skippy. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb.

Bishop was waving the document around in parliament but they blocked tabling it.. so no it isnt free for the press to publish..

why wouldnt she allow it to be tabled?????????

it just had her signature on it..whats so BAD about that?i
I wonder.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #110 - Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:54am

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb.

Bishop was waving the document around in parliament but they blocked tabling it.. so no it isnt free for the press to publish..

why wouldnt she allow it to be tabled?????????

it just had her signature on it..whats so BAD about that?i
I wonder.

Why won't Bishop hand it over to the police?????????????????????????????????

TOMATOES HORSES

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #111 - Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:01am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb.

Bishop was waving the document around in parliament but they blocked tabling it.. so no it isnt free for the press to publish..

why wouldnt she allow it to be tabled?????????

it just had her signature on it..whats so BAD about that?i
I wonder.

Why won't Bishop hand it over to the police?????????????????????????????????

TOMATOES HORSES

well I dont usually bother with the likes of you... you are so obnoxious..

however what would the police do with it???? dumb dumb..

do you think anyone can walk into a police station with a piece of paper and say Investigate this for me....gawd!!!!!!!!!!!!!

n o one has asked them to investigate it is up to the AWU to ask that.

and I think you will find gillard is as thick as ...well thieves with the AWU..

Howes made a huge song and dance about getting members money back...and then silence.....not word has he said about this since..

dumb dumb.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #112 - Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:16am

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:01am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb.

Bishop was waving the document around in parliament but they blocked tabling it.. so no it isnt free for the press to publish..

why wouldnt she allow it to be tabled?????????

it just had her signature on it..whats so BAD about that?i
I wonder.

Why won't Bishop hand it over to the police?????????????????????????????????

TOMATOES HORSES

well I dont usually bother with the likes of you... you are so obnoxious..

however what would the police do with it???? dumb dumb..

do you think anyone can walk into a police station with a piece of paper and say Investigate this for me....gawd!!!!!!!!!!!!!

n o one has asked them to investigate it is up to the AWU to ask that.

and I think you will find gillard is as thick as ...well thieves with the AWU..

Howes made a huge song and dance about getting members money back...and then silence.....not word has he said about this since..

dumb dumb.

Are you FOR REAL!?!?!?! TOMATOES HORSES!!!

1. Police are there to maintain the law and to investigate. It is their job. Especially if Julie Bishop decides to get in touch with them and advise them she has this evidence.

2. JULIE BISHOP IS NOT THE POLICE. TOMATOES HORSES!!!! SHE SHOULD NOT BE STARTING A WITCH HUNT.

3. There actually is an ongoing fraud investigation into the scandal. SO JULIE CAN GIVE THEM THE DOCUMENTATION. TOMATOES HORSES!

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #113 - Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:20am

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:01am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb.

Bishop was waving the document around in parliament but they blocked tabling it.. so no it isnt free for the press to publish..

why wouldnt she allow it to be tabled?????????

it just had her signature on it..whats so BAD about that?i
I wonder.

Why won't Bishop hand it over to the police?????????????????????????????????

TOMATOES HORSES

well I dont usually bother with the likes of you... you are so obnoxious..

however what would the police do with it???? dumb dumb..

do you think anyone can walk into a police station with a piece of paper and say Investigate this for me....gawd!!!!!!!!!!!!!

n o one has asked them to investigate it is up to the AWU to ask that.

and I think you will find gillard is as thick as ...well thieves with the AWU..

Howes made a huge song and dance about getting members money back...and then silence.....not word has he said about this since..

dumb dumb.

The AWU will have to want their money back and fully co-operate.

Not having a decent AWU leadership, the liberals have done the next best thing. Get gillard to answer the parliament. Oops, she did and now she will need to explain further as she seems to have mislead parliament.

Tactics are the only way to get this poison fixed.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation?
Reply #114 - Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:21am

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:20am:

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:01am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 7:48am:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents

If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb.

Bishop was waving the document around in parliament but they blocked tabling it.. so no it isnt free for the press to publish..

why wouldnt she allow it to be tabled?????????

it just had her signature on it..whats so BAD about that?i
I wonder.

Why won't Bishop hand it over to the police?????????????????????????????????

TOMATOES HORSES

well I dont usually bother with the likes of you... you are so obnoxious..

however what would the police do with it???? dumb dumb..

do you think anyone can walk into a police station with a piece of paper and say Investigate this for me....gawd!!!!!!!!!!!!!

n o one has asked them to investigate it is up to the AWU to ask that.

and I think you will find gillard is as thick as ...well thieves with the AWU..

Howes made a huge song and dance about getting members money back...and then silence.....not word has he said about this since..

dumb dumb.

The AWU will have to want their money back and fully co-operate.

Not having a decent AWU leadership, the liberals have done the next best thing. Get gillard to answer the parliament. Oops, she did and now she will need to explain further as she seems to have mislead parliament.

Tactics are the only way to get this poison fixed.

Are you still trying to creep out of your hole? Documentation, and then you can come out and play again.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged