Australian Politics Forum - If your partner suddenly starts............

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #15 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 6:02pm

Dnarever wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:43am:

woof woof wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:26am:

Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??

See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??

starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

A lot of people buy a house - the police must be very busy.

My wife once worked with a man who embezzled $28M from Flinders Uni. He earned $60K a pear and hard no family money. I question how his wife (or anyone else for that matter) didnt know something was awry when he bought a $3M house (in adelaide no less), half of the Adelaide 36ers and more...

I refuse to believe anyone can be THAT naive.

He is still in jail

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #16 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #17 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:13pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 6:02pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:43am:

woof woof wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:26am:

Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??

See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??

starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

A lot of people buy a house - the police must be very busy.

My wife once worked with a man who embezzled $28M from Flinders Uni. He earned $60K a pear and hard no family money. I question how his wife (or anyone else for that matter) didnt know something was awry when he bought a $3M house (in adelaide no less), half of the Adelaide 36ers and more...

I refuse to believe anyone can be THAT naive.

He is still in jail

Was the fitZroy house $3m and Wilson earned 60k a year?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #18 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 120191
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #19 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:17pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

He means a lynch mob - dopey.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #20 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:17pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone. Grin

.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here?

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #21 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:19pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone. Grin

.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here?

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct.

My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #22 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:19pm

skippy. wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:28am:

woof woof wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:26am:

Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??

See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??

Maybe Gillard isn't as stupid as you, Matty, maybe she thought her ex bought the house with a mortgage like 99.9% of people do. Roll Eyes

wow how do you manage to remember to breath?

lucky breathing is controlled by involuntary muscles .....

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #23 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:20pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 6:02pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:43am:

woof woof wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:26am:

Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??

See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??

starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

A lot of people buy a house - the police must be very busy.

My wife once worked with a man who embezzled $28M from Flinders Uni. He earned $60K a pear and hard no family money. I question how his wife (or anyone else for that matter) didnt know something was awry when he bought a $3M house (in adelaide no less), half of the Adelaide 36ers and more...

I refuse to believe anyone can be THAT naive.

He is still in jail

Hard no money? What a goose! Grin

(ps, now that we've had our laugh at spelling wanna get back to arguing the actual issue?)

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #24 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:23pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:20pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 6:02pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:43am:

woof woof wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:26am:

Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??

See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??

starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

A lot of people buy a house - the police must be very busy.

My wife once worked with a man who embezzled $28M from Flinders Uni. He earned $60K a pear and hard no family money. I question how his wife (or anyone else for that matter) didnt know something was awry when he bought a $3M house (in adelaide no less), half of the Adelaide 36ers and more...

I refuse to believe anyone can be THAT naive.

He is still in jail

Hard no money? What a goose! Grin

(ps, now that we've had our laugh at spelling wanna get back to arguing the actual issue?)

sure... as soon as you tll me what you were trying to say coz it wasnt very clear - even correcting for bad spelling!

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #25 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:24pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone. Grin

.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here?

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct.

My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.

The point is very simple: criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members. If there is evidence hand it to the police. Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

woof woof Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1518 Gender:	Re: If your partner suddenly starts............ Reply #26 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:27pm So why wont she answer questions raised in parliament?????? shes a filthy lying witch.
Back to top	IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #27 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:28pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone. Grin

.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here?

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct.

My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.

The point is very simple: criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members. If there is evidence hand it to the police. Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.

Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #28 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:32pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:28pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone. Grin

.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here?

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct.

My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.

The point is very simple: criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members. If there is evidence hand it to the police. Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.

Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...

People don't have to prove their innocence it's the states job to prove guilt. And proving non guilt in any case is done in a court of law not in parliament.

And when did labor accuse Abbott of a crime?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #29 - Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:44pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:32pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:28pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:

Here's a hypothetical: if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations? Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?

What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?

Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone. Grin

.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here?

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct.

My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.

The point is very simple: criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members. If there is evidence hand it to the police. Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.

Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...

People don't have to prove their innocence it's the states job to prove guilt. And proving non guilt in any case is done in a court of law not in parliament.

And when did labor accuse Abbott of a crime?

No-one has to prove guilt. The PM however needs to answer the questions put to her.

Back to top

IP Logged