Australian Politics Forum - If your partner suddenly starts............

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #135 - Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:29pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:19pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:52pm:

woof woof wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:45pm:

The thing is, is that if Bishop was telling lies wouldn't she be misleading parliament??

Now the bloke that got kicked out the other day for saying Gillard is corrupt he's still there so he hasn't misled parliament??

Skippy how did Blewitt take out a mortgage when Wilson bought a house in Blewitts name using a power of attorney that was illegally established and Blewitt didn't even know the house had been bought???

why have all the key players in this game been rewarded by Gillard with high paying jobs???

I am not sure it is possible to mislead parliament within a question and with documentation the other side will not allow you to table and the PM not giving a direct answer

It is more like the public will make up their own minds with gillard not answering rather than it being gillard arguing she has been misrepresented or that liberals lied to parliament

Hi!! Did you decide to crawl back in did you? Got that documentation yet?

Labor... the party of criminal acts.

Well then perhaps Abbott and Bishop should join?

wouldnt pass the criminal check. No criminal convictions or dubious credentials. Why do you think so many labor MPs end up doing long stints in jail?

Dubious credentials? Alleged sexual assault and plagiarism? Really? Not dubious to you? If we're going to start doing witch hunts, as is so clearly promoted withiin this thread by conservatives, then one must look at these dubious characters and suggest, as gold_medal suggests, that they join the labor party.

If you want to list the criminal convictions of MPs then go right ahead. Topping the list with child sex offences re no less than 7 Labor MPs, Libs none. Hindering the administration of justice? again labor. High level of corruption? Labor yet again. And let's not forget rape and Drug trafficking - also labor.

After you've listed those you can deal with Liberal offences - none of which make the top 15.

And lets not forget SA's very own Labor MLC on child porn charges.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #136 - Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:33pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:19pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:52pm:

woof woof wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:45pm:

The thing is, is that if Bishop was telling lies wouldn't she be misleading parliament??

Now the bloke that got kicked out the other day for saying Gillard is corrupt he's still there so he hasn't misled parliament??

Skippy how did Blewitt take out a mortgage when Wilson bought a house in Blewitts name using a power of attorney that was illegally established and Blewitt didn't even know the house had been bought???

why have all the key players in this game been rewarded by Gillard with high paying jobs???

I am not sure it is possible to mislead parliament within a question and with documentation the other side will not allow you to table and the PM not giving a direct answer

It is more like the public will make up their own minds with gillard not answering rather than it being gillard arguing she has been misrepresented or that liberals lied to parliament

Hi!! Did you decide to crawl back in did you? Got that documentation yet?

Labor... the party of criminal acts.

Well then perhaps Abbott and Bishop should join?

wouldnt pass the criminal check. No criminal convictions or dubious credentials. Why do you think so many labor MPs end up doing long stints in jail?

Dubious credentials? Alleged sexual assault and plagiarism? Really? Not dubious to you? If we're going to start doing witch hunts, as is so clearly promoted withiin this thread by conservatives, then one must look at these dubious characters and suggest, as gold_medal suggests, that they join the labor party.

If you want to list the criminal convictions of MPs then go right ahead. Topping the list with child sex offences re no less than 7 Labor MPs, Libs none. Hindering the administration of justice? again labor. High level of corruption? Labor yet again. And let's not forget rape and Drug trafficking - also labor.

After you've listed those you can deal with Liberal offences - none of which make the top 15.

And lets not forget SA's very own Labor MLC on child porn charges.

So you feel past actions of individuals is enough to warrant a witch hunt rather than let judicial systems do what they are designed to do? Your argument only supports that our legal system catches out politicians and as a result this isn't the job for an admitted plagiarist.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #137 - Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:40pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:33pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:19pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:52pm:

woof woof wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:45pm:

The thing is, is that if Bishop was telling lies wouldn't she be misleading parliament??

Now the bloke that got kicked out the other day for saying Gillard is corrupt he's still there so he hasn't misled parliament??

Skippy how did Blewitt take out a mortgage when Wilson bought a house in Blewitts name using a power of attorney that was illegally established and Blewitt didn't even know the house had been bought???

why have all the key players in this game been rewarded by Gillard with high paying jobs???

I am not sure it is possible to mislead parliament within a question and with documentation the other side will not allow you to table and the PM not giving a direct answer

It is more like the public will make up their own minds with gillard not answering rather than it being gillard arguing she has been misrepresented or that liberals lied to parliament

Hi!! Did you decide to crawl back in did you? Got that documentation yet?

Labor... the party of criminal acts.

Well then perhaps Abbott and Bishop should join?

wouldnt pass the criminal check. No criminal convictions or dubious credentials. Why do you think so many labor MPs end up doing long stints in jail?

Dubious credentials? Alleged sexual assault and plagiarism? Really? Not dubious to you? If we're going to start doing witch hunts, as is so clearly promoted withiin this thread by conservatives, then one must look at these dubious characters and suggest, as gold_medal suggests, that they join the labor party.

If you want to list the criminal convictions of MPs then go right ahead. Topping the list with child sex offences re no less than 7 Labor MPs, Libs none. Hindering the administration of justice? again labor. High level of corruption? Labor yet again. And let's not forget rape and Drug trafficking - also labor.

After you've listed those you can deal with Liberal offences - none of which make the top 15.

And lets not forget SA's very own Labor MLC on child porn charges.

So you feel past actions of individuals is enough to warrant a witch hunt rather than let judicial systems do what they are designed to do? Your argument only supports that our legal system catches out politicians and as a result this isn't the job for an admitted plagiarist.

You are stil not making ANY sense. Can you try and explain what point you are making because you are clear as mud.

And no bonus points for ignoring Labors strong pedo past. I expected better than that.

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #138 - Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:45pm

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:40pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:33pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:19pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:15pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm:

gold_medal wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 4:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:52pm:

woof woof wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 3:45pm:

The thing is, is that if Bishop was telling lies wouldn't she be misleading parliament??

Now the bloke that got kicked out the other day for saying Gillard is corrupt he's still there so he hasn't misled parliament??

Skippy how did Blewitt take out a mortgage when Wilson bought a house in Blewitts name using a power of attorney that was illegally established and Blewitt didn't even know the house had been bought???

why have all the key players in this game been rewarded by Gillard with high paying jobs???

I am not sure it is possible to mislead parliament within a question and with documentation the other side will not allow you to table and the PM not giving a direct answer

It is more like the public will make up their own minds with gillard not answering rather than it being gillard arguing she has been misrepresented or that liberals lied to parliament

Hi!! Did you decide to crawl back in did you? Got that documentation yet?

Labor... the party of criminal acts.

Well then perhaps Abbott and Bishop should join?

wouldnt pass the criminal check. No criminal convictions or dubious credentials. Why do you think so many labor MPs end up doing long stints in jail?

Dubious credentials? Alleged sexual assault and plagiarism? Really? Not dubious to you? If we're going to start doing witch hunts, as is so clearly promoted withiin this thread by conservatives, then one must look at these dubious characters and suggest, as gold_medal suggests, that they join the labor party.

If you want to list the criminal convictions of MPs then go right ahead. Topping the list with child sex offences re no less than 7 Labor MPs, Libs none. Hindering the administration of justice? again labor. High level of corruption? Labor yet again. And let's not forget rape and Drug trafficking - also labor.

After you've listed those you can deal with Liberal offences - none of which make the top 15.

And lets not forget SA's very own Labor MLC on child porn charges.

So you feel past actions of individuals is enough to warrant a witch hunt rather than let judicial systems do what they are designed to do? Your argument only supports that our legal system catches out politicians and as a result this isn't the job for an admitted plagiarist.

And no bonus points for ignoring Labors strong pedo past. I expected better than that.

Longpersonofquestionablecharacter seems to know a lot about pedophiles , it's his favourite subject, he's always talking about it, creepy.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged