Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print
If your partner suddenly starts............ (Read 5985 times)
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #105 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:39pm
 
woof woof wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:26am:
Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of  asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??


See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??



If you have a d!ck and you have been a Rhodes scholar, noticing this sort of thing is yet another utterly negative thing that you always do and you should be, like,  ashamed.

if you are a Labor lawyer with female sexual characteristics, you should be non-judgemental and let your BF just be himself, ok? You are as young and naive as you feel, right?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39816
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #106 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:40pm
 
Quote:
The only time I will provide links on this subject is when I require myself to do so, not because johny come lately desires it.


Yep..............an arrogant, lying numbnut.  If you had the links, you'd have no problem posting them.  The links do not exist and neither ought liars like you on any Forum where there ought be some requirement for basic honesty.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #107 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:41pm
 
Soren wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:39pm:
woof woof wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:26am:
Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of  asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??


See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??



If you have a d!ck and you have been a Rhodes scholar, noticing this sort of thing is yet another utterly negative thing that you always do and you should be, like,  ashamed.

if you are a Labor lawyer with female sexual characteristics, you should be non-judgemental and let your BF just be himself, ok? You are as young and naive as you feel, right?




I don't think other Rhode Scholars are very thrilled with the fact that Tony somehow managed to become one.  He is a bit of dimwit.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #108 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:43pm
 
I think progs has gone to look for that evidence .... he might be a while fellas, probably shouldn't wait up for him ....
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #109 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:45pm
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:43pm:
I think progs has gone to look for that evidence .... he might be a while fellas, probably shouldn't wait up for him ....

he is busy helping maqqa redecorate his new hole in the wall.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #110 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:55pm
 
Aussie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:40pm:
Quote:
The only time I will provide links on this subject is when I require myself to do so, not because johny come lately desires it.


Yep..............an arrogant, lying numbnut.  If you had the links, you'd have no problem posting them.  The links do not exist and neither ought liars like you on any Forum where there ought be some requirement for basic honesty.

oh dam it, you caught me out. lol

Ill give you a hint. Blewitt never got a home loan via mortgage. Wilson under a dodgy power of attorney (dodgy because the poor sod at the end of it says its dodgy) didnt get a home loan via Blewitts mortgage either.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #111 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:58pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:55pm:
Aussie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:40pm:
Quote:
The only time I will provide links on this subject is when I require myself to do so, not because johny come lately desires it.


Yep..............an arrogant, lying numbnut.  If you had the links, you'd have no problem posting them.  The links do not exist and neither ought liars like you on any Forum where there ought be some requirement for basic honesty.

oh dam it, you caught me out. lol

Ill give you a hint. Blewitt never got a home loan via mortgage. Wilson under a dodgy power of attorney (dodgy because the poor sod at the end of it says its dodgy) didnt get a home loan via Blewitts mortgage either.


you seem to be mistaking heresay as EVIDENCE .... you have ZERO evidence that Gillard did anything wrong ...
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39816
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #112 - Nov 2nd, 2012 at 10:00pm
 
Quote:
Ill give you a hint. Blewitt never got a home loan via mortgage. Wilson under a dodgy power of attorney (dodgy because the poor sod at the end of it says its dodgy) didnt get a home loan via Blewitts mortgage either.


Let's see the documents you said we can all see.

Or..............were you lying, like I said you were.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #113 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:07am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:32pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:28pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:
Here's a hypothetical:  if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations?  Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?


What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?


Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone.  Grin.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here? 

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct. 


My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.



The point is very simple:  criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members.  If there is evidence hand it to the police.  Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.


Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...


People don't have to prove their innocence it's the states job to prove guilt.  And proving non guilt in any case is done in a court of law not in parliament. 

And when did labor accuse Abbott of a crime?


seriously? assault... sexism.... sexual assault... etc etc...

all from the party with some of its own former MPs still in jail on rape, drugs and child sex charges.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #114 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:39am
 
gold_medal wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:07am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:32pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:28pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:
Here's a hypothetical:  if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations?  Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?


What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?


Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone.  Grin.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here? 

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct. 


My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.



The point is very simple:  criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members.  If there is evidence hand it to the police.  Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.


Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...


People don't have to prove their innocence it's the states job to prove guilt.  And proving non guilt in any case is done in a court of law not in parliament. 

And when did labor accuse Abbott of a crime?


seriously? assault... sexism.... sexual assault... etc etc...

all from the party with some of its own former MPs still in jail on rape, drugs and child sex charges.

The labor party never accuses him of assault or sexual assault.  That was individual people who did that.

As for sexism, not a crimInal matter.

Next, goose?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #115 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:52am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:39am:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:07am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:32pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:28pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:
Here's a hypothetical:  if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations?  Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?


What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?


Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone.  Grin.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here? 

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct. 


My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.



The point is very simple:  criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members.  If there is evidence hand it to the police.  Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.


Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...


People don't have to prove their innocence it's the states job to prove guilt.  And proving non guilt in any case is done in a court of law not in parliament. 

And when did labor accuse Abbott of a crime?


seriously? assault... sexism.... sexual assault... etc etc...

all from the party with some of its own former MPs still in jail on rape, drugs and child sex charges.

The labor party never accuses him of assault or sexual assault.  That was individual people who did that.

As for sexism, not a crimInal matter.

Next, goose?


do you want to run with that or do I start laughing derisively now?

the liberal party has never accused anyone in the labor party of anything. it has always been individuals...

seriously tho, thats the kind of reponse Id expect from booby, not you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61858
Here
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #116 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:55am
 
Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of  asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??


If as in this case he was earning around $200K I would be suspicious if he didn't buy a house or be doing something with his income.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #117 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:58am
 
gold_medal wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:52am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:39am:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:07am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:32pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:28pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:
Here's a hypothetical:  if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations?  Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?


What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?


Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone.  Grin.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here? 

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct. 


My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.



The point is very simple:  criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members.  If there is evidence hand it to the police.  Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.


Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...


People don't have to prove their innocence it's the states job to prove guilt.  And proving non guilt in any case is done in a court of law not in parliament. 

And when did labor accuse Abbott of a crime?


seriously? assault... sexism.... sexual assault... etc etc...

all from the party with some of its own former MPs still in jail on rape, drugs and child sex charges.

The labor party never accuses him of assault or sexual assault.  That was individual people who did that.

As for sexism, not a crimInal matter.

Next, goose?


do you want to run with that or do I start laughing derisively now?

the liberal party has never accused anyone in the labor party of anything. it has always been individuals...

seriously tho, thats the kind of reponse Id expect from booby, not you.


So the labor party 30 odd years ago accused abbott of sexual assault?  And David Marr wrote about a woman who alleged Abbott nearly assaulted her I take it that was labor too? 
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:11am by sir prince duke alevine »  

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26588
Australia
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #118 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:30am
 
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 6:02pm:
Dnarever wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:43am:
woof woof wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:26am:
Lets run a simple hypothetical.

Your partner works in a job with decent income. All of  asudden your partner starts buying expensive clothes, cars, gambling, a house even.

Would you suspect something was amiss?? like taking monies from work?? or would you just think things are normal??


See Gillard whose BF Wilson who set up in Gillards own words a slush fund, starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

Would she not think gee somethings not right here??

Young and naive?? or in on the con??


starts buying lots of expensive stuff like a house.

A lot of people buy a house - the police must be very busy.


My wife once worked with a man who embezzled $28M from Flinders Uni. He earned $60K a pear and hard no family money. I question how his wife (or anyone else for that matter) didnt know something was awry when he bought a $3M house (in adelaide no less), half of the Adelaide 36ers and more...

I refuse to believe anyone can be THAT naive.

He is still in jail


My dad was a lawyer and was caught embezzling in WA back in the 70s, He made them pay him out when they sacked him. The law can be on the side of the thief sometimes.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
gold_medal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male
Re: If your partner suddenly starts............
Reply #119 - Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:02pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:58am:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:52am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:39am:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:07am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:32pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:28pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:24pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:19pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:17pm:
gold_medal wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:15pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 7:12pm:
Here's a hypothetical:  if you were accused of a crime, and you provided public statements and then some lunch mob continued to accuse you, would you prefer to the law maintained ur innocence and the state was in charge of proving you guilty, or you prefer to have the lynch mob inadueqetly prosecute you and execute you without evidence but just accusations?  Would you rather a proper system, or someone who themselves ha previously admitted to commuting a crime?


What's a lunch mob?

But more importantly, what are you trying to ask as it sounds all rather confused. Maybe it was the spelling?


Hav nothing so you pick on auto correct on my iPhone.  Grin.

And you're the one recently having a big teary about the level of debate here? 

I suggest you argue the point not the auto correct. 


My point was that I dont GET your point! And I understodd 'lunch mob'. it was the usually failed attempt an humour on here.



The point is very simple:  criminal investigations are handled by the police and the courts, not a squinty eyed opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman or the liberal lynch mob members.  If there is evidence hand it to the police.  Otherwise Bishop should spend question time doing the job Australians expect her to do, and for the other choir members, find something better to do than constantly raise pitchforks in the air.


Well now that post is actually understandable.

And when Labor does not accuse Libs of crimes (eg Abbot etc) then come back and try again. IN the meantime you either look like a hypocrite or unaware of Labors criminal element.

Either way, its time to let Gillard prove her innocence or make sure that Labor doesnt make accusations either.

Play hard or play fair. But dont expect the other side to play by different rules.

Next...


People don't have to prove their innocence it's the states job to prove guilt.  And proving non guilt in any case is done in a court of law not in parliament. 

And when did labor accuse Abbott of a crime?


seriously? assault... sexism.... sexual assault... etc etc...

all from the party with some of its own former MPs still in jail on rape, drugs and child sex charges.

The labor party never accuses him of assault or sexual assault.  That was individual people who did that.

As for sexism, not a crimInal matter.

Next, goose?


do you want to run with that or do I start laughing derisively now?

the liberal party has never accused anyone in the labor party of anything. it has always been individuals...

seriously tho, thats the kind of reponse Id expect from booby, not you.


So the labor party 30 odd years ago accused abbott of sexual assault?  And David Marr wrote about a woman who alleged Abbott nearly assaulted her I take it that was labor too? 


You're usually more intelligent than this drivel. The point is simple: dont accuse the libs of making allegations as if Labor dont do the same and worse.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print