Australian Politics Forum - Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #75 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:34pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:32pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:48pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:39pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:18pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:08pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Does anyone besides progs think that this isn't going to have an impact on storm surges.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/NYSLR.jpg

maybe they should dredge out some of the sand that has built up in the bay

That is not the sea

What's that progs, individual sea level readings can't be used to make generalisations. How very interesting.

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/images/CSIRO_GMSL_figure.jpg

But the oceans aren't expanding, are they, progs?

How very interesting to use a bay as your marker. Shame you cant use the actual ocean to speak of the ocean.

Deception is the name of the game in AGW land after all.

Let me see if I can find a graph. BRB

It appears that sheer ignorance is the name of your game.

MOTR posted a graph showing combined TOPEX/Poseiden and Jason-1, Jason-2 data - satellite data that has been mapping global ocean topography since 1992.

Global. Not in one bay. Global.

You told a lie.

Again.

When are you going to explain to us why sea levels are rising if it isn't die to global warming?
What is the cause?

Why do you continually claim that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, then run away like a little girl whenever you are asked to explain this ridiculous statement?

Why is sea level rising if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is global glacial mass balance decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is the arctic ice cap decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
How is it possible that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, when surface temperature measurements over the past 16 years have shown a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the long term average, for every single one of those 16 years?

Don't you think you should address some of these lies you have been caught telling?

I like that. Not one mention of co2.

We are still waiting for you to explain why you think the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

Don't run away.

Answer the question

Why is sea level rising, global glacial mass balance decreasing and arctic sea ice decreasing if the earth is not warming - and how can the earth not be warming when each of the past 16 years have shown a positive surface temperature anomaly over the long term average.

Why do you continually repeat David Rose's nonsense about no warming in 16 years?

Why do you repeat this nonsense then run away like a little girl when asked to explain it?

I dont think it. I know it from empirical data.

No you don't it from empirical data. Because there is no empirical data indicating that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

You read a David Rose article on some retarded blog and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The empirical data such as surface temperature, ocean temperature, sea level, glacial mass balance, arctic sea ice etc all indicate very clearly and unabiguously that the earth has most definitely been warming, especially in the past 16 years.

Stop telling lies little man.
Show us this "empirical data" that has led you to make a fool of yourself publically like this.

Earth has not warmed for 16 years. Get over it. I cant help it you dont like the information the MET office gives out.

Can anyone else smell burning pants?

But you disappoint me Progs. It is usually here you come out with your classic liar resonses like:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21^st, 2012 at 11:52am:

If you dont know how to research, then I am not about to give you the answer.

or

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:

what. lol. How about you research.

You have been caught lying again - give us some of that classic spineless evasion you are famous for

I have already given you the MET empirical data. I dont need to give it to you again becuase your brain functions different to everyone else.

LIAR

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/average-temps.gif

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

You said you have already given us the MET empirical data.

The MET empirical data shows you are a liar.

Pants on fire

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #76 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:34pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

progs has no credibility on any subject matter. He doesn't even know what a rolling average is. Don't bother debating with him - he just gets confused and it isn't good for his health Sad

lol you just cant help yourself.

Go on, try not to debate me and see how far you get.

Ill give the lastwordwarrior a day.

explain what rolling average is.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #77 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:36pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:32pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:48pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:39pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:18pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:08pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Does anyone besides progs think that this isn't going to have an impact on storm surges.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/NYSLR.jpg

maybe they should dredge out some of the sand that has built up in the bay

That is not the sea

What's that progs, individual sea level readings can't be used to make generalisations. How very interesting.

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/images/CSIRO_GMSL_figure.jpg

But the oceans aren't expanding, are they, progs?

How very interesting to use a bay as your marker. Shame you cant use the actual ocean to speak of the ocean.

Deception is the name of the game in AGW land after all.

Let me see if I can find a graph. BRB

It appears that sheer ignorance is the name of your game.

MOTR posted a graph showing combined TOPEX/Poseiden and Jason-1, Jason-2 data - satellite data that has been mapping global ocean topography since 1992.

Global. Not in one bay. Global.

You told a lie.

Again.

When are you going to explain to us why sea levels are rising if it isn't die to global warming?
What is the cause?

Why do you continually claim that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, then run away like a little girl whenever you are asked to explain this ridiculous statement?

Why is sea level rising if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is global glacial mass balance decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is the arctic ice cap decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
How is it possible that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, when surface temperature measurements over the past 16 years have shown a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the long term average, for every single one of those 16 years?

Don't you think you should address some of these lies you have been caught telling?

I like that. Not one mention of co2.

We are still waiting for you to explain why you think the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

Don't run away.

Answer the question

Why is sea level rising, global glacial mass balance decreasing and arctic sea ice decreasing if the earth is not warming - and how can the earth not be warming when each of the past 16 years have shown a positive surface temperature anomaly over the long term average.

Why do you continually repeat David Rose's nonsense about no warming in 16 years?

Why do you repeat this nonsense then run away like a little girl when asked to explain it?

I dont think it. I know it from empirical data.

No you don't it from empirical data. Because there is no empirical data indicating that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

You read a David Rose article on some retarded blog and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The empirical data such as surface temperature, ocean temperature, sea level, glacial mass balance, arctic sea ice etc all indicate very clearly and unabiguously that the earth has most definitely been warming, especially in the past 16 years.

Stop telling lies little man.
Show us this "empirical data" that has led you to make a fool of yourself publically like this.

Earth has not warmed for 16 years. Get over it. I cant help it you dont like the information the MET office gives out.

Can anyone else smell burning pants?

But you disappoint me Progs. It is usually here you come out with your classic liar resonses like:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21^st, 2012 at 11:52am:

If you dont know how to research, then I am not about to give you the answer.

or

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:

what. lol. How about you research.

You have been caught lying again - give us some of that classic spineless evasion you are famous for

I have already given you the MET empirical data. I dont need to give it to you again becuase your brain functions different to everyone else.

LIAR

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/average-temps.gif

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

You said you have already given us the MET empirical data.

The MET empirical data shows you are a liar.

Pants on fire

Pants on fire... what the fffffrig lol

MET's empirical data that shows the earth has not warmed for 16 years.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott? Reply #78 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:43pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:36pm: MET's empirical data that shows the earth has not warmed for 16 years. like I said ... village IDIOT
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #79 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:43pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

progs has no credibility on any subject matter. He doesn't even know what a rolling average is. Don't bother debating with him - he just gets confused and it isn't good for his health Sad

lol you just cant help yourself.

Go on, try not to debate me and see how far you get.

Ill give the lastwordwarrior a day.

explain what rolling average is.

Progs would surely agree that asylum seeker deaths at sea have decreased since the Howard era.

There were 104 asylum seeker deaths at sea in 2012
There were 353 asylum seeker deaths at sea in 2001

So the Gillard government has reduced deaths at sea of asylum seekers.
Do you agree Progs?
It is using your maths.

If you don't agree - please explain to us the problem.
I understand what the problem is - do you?

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #80 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:36pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:34pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:32pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:48pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:39pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:18pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:08pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Does anyone besides progs think that this isn't going to have an impact on storm surges.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/NYSLR.jpg

maybe they should dredge out some of the sand that has built up in the bay

That is not the sea

What's that progs, individual sea level readings can't be used to make generalisations. How very interesting.

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/images/CSIRO_GMSL_figure.jpg

But the oceans aren't expanding, are they, progs?

How very interesting to use a bay as your marker. Shame you cant use the actual ocean to speak of the ocean.

Deception is the name of the game in AGW land after all.

Let me see if I can find a graph. BRB

It appears that sheer ignorance is the name of your game.

MOTR posted a graph showing combined TOPEX/Poseiden and Jason-1, Jason-2 data - satellite data that has been mapping global ocean topography since 1992.

Global. Not in one bay. Global.

You told a lie.

Again.

When are you going to explain to us why sea levels are rising if it isn't die to global warming?
What is the cause?

Why do you continually claim that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, then run away like a little girl whenever you are asked to explain this ridiculous statement?

Why is sea level rising if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is global glacial mass balance decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is the arctic ice cap decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
How is it possible that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, when surface temperature measurements over the past 16 years have shown a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the long term average, for every single one of those 16 years?

Don't you think you should address some of these lies you have been caught telling?

I like that. Not one mention of co2.

We are still waiting for you to explain why you think the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

Don't run away.

Answer the question

Why is sea level rising, global glacial mass balance decreasing and arctic sea ice decreasing if the earth is not warming - and how can the earth not be warming when each of the past 16 years have shown a positive surface temperature anomaly over the long term average.

Why do you continually repeat David Rose's nonsense about no warming in 16 years?

Why do you repeat this nonsense then run away like a little girl when asked to explain it?

I dont think it. I know it from empirical data.

No you don't it from empirical data. Because there is no empirical data indicating that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

You read a David Rose article on some retarded blog and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The empirical data such as surface temperature, ocean temperature, sea level, glacial mass balance, arctic sea ice etc all indicate very clearly and unabiguously that the earth has most definitely been warming, especially in the past 16 years.

Stop telling lies little man.
Show us this "empirical data" that has led you to make a fool of yourself publically like this.

Earth has not warmed for 16 years. Get over it. I cant help it you dont like the information the MET office gives out.

Can anyone else smell burning pants?

But you disappoint me Progs. It is usually here you come out with your classic liar resonses like:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21^st, 2012 at 11:52am:

If you dont know how to research, then I am not about to give you the answer.

or

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:

what. lol. How about you research.

You have been caught lying again - give us some of that classic spineless evasion you are famous for

I have already given you the MET empirical data. I dont need to give it to you again becuase your brain functions different to everyone else.

LIAR

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/average-temps.gif

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

You said you have already given us the MET empirical data.

The MET empirical data shows you are a liar.

Pants on fire

Pants on fire... what the fffffrig lol

MET's empirical data that shows the earth has not warmed for 16 years.

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #81 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #82 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #83 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Not running. Just cant argue with stupid.

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years. If you did not like it, that does not concern me.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #84 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:07pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Not running. Just cant argue with stupid.

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years. If you did not like it, that does not concern me.

What you are doing is creating a sense of doubt where there is none. The met understands the earth is unambiguously warming, you don't want others to know that. One wonders how you live with yourself.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #85 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:11pm

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:07pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Not running. Just cant argue with stupid.

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years. If you did not like it, that does not concern me.

What you are doing is creating a sense of doubt where there is none. The met understands the earth is unambiguously warming, you don't want others to know that. One wonders how you live with yourself.

Yes because somehow, no-one is listening to you. If you believe in the information you provide, then what has that got to do with me and your invisibility.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #86 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:14pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:11pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:07pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Not running. Just cant argue with stupid.

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years. If you did not like it, that does not concern me.

What you are doing is creating a sense of doubt where there is none. The met understands the earth is unambiguously warming, you don't want others to know that. One wonders how you live with yourself.

Yes because somehow, no-one is listening to you. If you believe in the information you provide, then what has that got to do with me and your invisibility.

You told a lie:
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years.

You have been asked to explain why you told that lie.

Please explain.

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #87 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:20pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:14pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:11pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:07pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Not running. Just cant argue with stupid.

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years. If you did not like it, that does not concern me.

What you are doing is creating a sense of doubt where there is none. The met understands the earth is unambiguously warming, you don't want others to know that. One wonders how you live with yourself.

Yes because somehow, no-one is listening to you. If you believe in the information you provide, then what has that got to do with me and your invisibility.

You told a lie:
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years.

You have been asked to explain why you told that lie.

Please explain.

I have given up arguing with stupid today. You didnt like the empirical information. Too bad. I am not going through why you dont think 0.5 and 0.5 equal 0.5 after 16 years. 0.5 is still 0.5 after 1 million years, but that might be too big a number for you.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #88 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:23pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:20pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:14pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:11pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:07pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Not running. Just cant argue with stupid.

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years. If you did not like it, that does not concern me.

What you are doing is creating a sense of doubt where there is none. The met understands the earth is unambiguously warming, you don't want others to know that. One wonders how you live with yourself.

Yes because somehow, no-one is listening to you. If you believe in the information you provide, then what has that got to do with me and your invisibility.

You told a lie:
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years.

You have been asked to explain why you told that lie.

Please explain.

I have given up arguing with stupid today. You didnt like the empirical information. Too bad. I am not going through why you dont hink 0.5 and 0.5 equal 0.5 after 16 years. 0.5 is still 0.5 after 1 million years, but that might be too big a number for you.

You have not given us any empirical information.. You are a liar.

You have been shown the data from the UK Met. It confirms you are a liar.

Do you really think anyone takes you seriously? You have been exposed as a liar.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #89 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:25pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:11pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:07pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:05pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:59pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:51pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

Which empirical data is this progs?

the graph posted shows you are a big fat hairy liar.

Tell us why we should not just write you off as a big fat hairy liar. (NB - a photo demonstrating that you are neither big, fat nor hairy only answers half the question).

Hmmm how do I respond..... maybe an" I dont give a shiz" would be enough.

Yes.

That is what we expect.

When you get caught telling lies - you run away like a weak little girl.

You have done it before.

Not running. Just cant argue with stupid.

I gave you the MET empirical data of the earth not warming for 16 years. If you did not like it, that does not concern me.

What you are doing is creating a sense of doubt where there is none. The met understands the earth is unambiguously warming, you don't want others to know that. One wonders how you live with yourself.

Yes because somehow, no-one is listening to you. If you believe in the information you provide, then what has that got to do with me and your invisibility.

That's where you are wrong, progs.

Quote:

Nearly 80% of Democrats believe in global warming, while Republicans are almost evenly split with 47% seeing evidence of increasing global temperatures.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged