Australian Politics Forum - Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #60 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:39pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:18pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:08pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Does anyone besides progs think that this isn't going to have an impact on storm surges.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/NYSLR.jpg

maybe they should dredge out some of the sand that has built up in the bay

That is not the sea

What's that progs, individual sea level readings can't be used to make generalisations. How very interesting.

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/images/CSIRO_GMSL_figure.jpg

But the oceans aren't expanding, are they, progs?

How very interesting to use a bay as your marker. Shame you cant use the actual ocean to speak of the ocean.

Deception is the name of the game in AGW land after all.

Let me see if I can find a graph. BRB

It appears that sheer ignorance is the name of your game.

MOTR posted a graph showing combined TOPEX/Poseiden and Jason-1, Jason-2 data - satellite data that has been mapping global ocean topography since 1992.

Global. Not in one bay. Global.

You told a lie.

Again.

When are you going to explain to us why sea levels are rising if it isn't die to global warming?
What is the cause?

Why do you continually claim that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, then run away like a little girl whenever you are asked to explain this ridiculous statement?

Why is sea level rising if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is global glacial mass balance decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is the arctic ice cap decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
How is it possible that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, when surface temperature measurements over the past 16 years have shown a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the long term average, for every single one of those 16 years?

Don't you think you should address some of these lies you have been caught telling?

I like that. Not one mention of co2.

We are still waiting for you to explain why you think the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

Don't run away.

Answer the question

Why is sea level rising, global glacial mass balance decreasing and arctic sea ice decreasing if the earth is not warming - and how can the earth not be warming when each of the past 16 years have shown a positive surface temperature anomaly over the long term average.

Why do you continually repeat David Rose's nonsense about no warming in 16 years?

Why do you repeat this nonsense then run away like a little girl when asked to explain it?

I dont think it. I know it from empirical data.

No you don't it from empirical data. Because there is no empirical data indicating that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

You read a David Rose article on some retarded blog and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The empirical data such as surface temperature, ocean temperature, sea level, glacial mass balance, arctic sea ice etc all indicate very clearly and unabiguously that the earth has most definitely been warming, especially in the past 16 years.

Stop telling lies little man.
Show us this "empirical data" that has led you to make a fool of yourself publically like this.

Earth has not warmed for 16 years. Get over it. I cant help it you dont like the information the MET office gives out.

Can anyone else smell burning pants?

But you disappoint me Progs. It is usually here you come out with your classic liar resonses like:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21^st, 2012 at 11:52am:

If you dont know how to research, then I am not about to give you the answer.

or

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:

what. lol. How about you research.

You have been caught lying again - give us some of that classic spineless evasion you are famous for

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #61 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:48pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:39pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:18pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:08pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Does anyone besides progs think that this isn't going to have an impact on storm surges.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/NYSLR.jpg

maybe they should dredge out some of the sand that has built up in the bay

That is not the sea

What's that progs, individual sea level readings can't be used to make generalisations. How very interesting.

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/images/CSIRO_GMSL_figure.jpg

But the oceans aren't expanding, are they, progs?

How very interesting to use a bay as your marker. Shame you cant use the actual ocean to speak of the ocean.

Deception is the name of the game in AGW land after all.

Let me see if I can find a graph. BRB

It appears that sheer ignorance is the name of your game.

MOTR posted a graph showing combined TOPEX/Poseiden and Jason-1, Jason-2 data - satellite data that has been mapping global ocean topography since 1992.

Global. Not in one bay. Global.

You told a lie.

Again.

When are you going to explain to us why sea levels are rising if it isn't die to global warming?
What is the cause?

Why do you continually claim that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, then run away like a little girl whenever you are asked to explain this ridiculous statement?

Why is sea level rising if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is global glacial mass balance decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is the arctic ice cap decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
How is it possible that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, when surface temperature measurements over the past 16 years have shown a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the long term average, for every single one of those 16 years?

Don't you think you should address some of these lies you have been caught telling?

I like that. Not one mention of co2.

We are still waiting for you to explain why you think the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

Don't run away.

Answer the question

Why is sea level rising, global glacial mass balance decreasing and arctic sea ice decreasing if the earth is not warming - and how can the earth not be warming when each of the past 16 years have shown a positive surface temperature anomaly over the long term average.

Why do you continually repeat David Rose's nonsense about no warming in 16 years?

Why do you repeat this nonsense then run away like a little girl when asked to explain it?

I dont think it. I know it from empirical data.

No you don't it from empirical data. Because there is no empirical data indicating that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

You read a David Rose article on some retarded blog and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The empirical data such as surface temperature, ocean temperature, sea level, glacial mass balance, arctic sea ice etc all indicate very clearly and unabiguously that the earth has most definitely been warming, especially in the past 16 years.

Stop telling lies little man.
Show us this "empirical data" that has led you to make a fool of yourself publically like this.

Earth has not warmed for 16 years. Get over it. I cant help it you dont like the information the MET office gives out.

Can anyone else smell burning pants?

But you disappoint me Progs. It is usually here you come out with your classic liar resonses like:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21^st, 2012 at 11:52am:

If you dont know how to research, then I am not about to give you the answer.

or

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:

what. lol. How about you research.

You have been caught lying again - give us some of that classic spineless evasion you are famous for

I have already given you the MET empirical data. I dont need to give it to you again becuase your brain functions different to everyone else.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #62 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:51pm

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:28pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:09pm:

Is this the empirical data of which you speak.

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/average-temps.gif

This is the information the met gives out.

This data, progs.

They also had this to say

Quote:

———–

The below graph which shows years ranked in order of global temperature was not included in the response to Mr Rose, but is useful in this context as it illustrates the point made above that eight of the warmest years on record have occurred in the past decade.

But you're not really interested in what the met had to say.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #63 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:52pm

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:51pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:28pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:09pm:

Is this the empirical data of which you speak.

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/average-temps.gif

This is the information the met gives out.

This data, progs.

They also had this to say

Quote:

———–

The below graph which shows years ranked in order of global temperature was not included in the response to Mr Rose, but is useful in this context as it illustrates the point made above that eight of the warmest years on record have occurred in the past decade.

But you're not really interested in what the met had to say.

I am interested that the earth has not warmed since 1997-98

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 4^th, 2012 at 8:04pm by progressiveslol »

IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott? Reply #64 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:58pm You are a fool, progs. We can all see that there was a spike in temperatures caused by a massive El Niño event. We all know that the next El Niño will deliver another spike. Do you think people can't see the underlying trend for themselves.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott? Reply #65 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 8:03pm The likes of progs are a danger to society, I bet he wears checks with prints too.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #66 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #67 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #68 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:26pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

progs has no credibility on any subject matter. He doesn't even know what a rolling average is. Don't bother debating with him - he just gets confused and it isn't good for his health Sad

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #69 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:27pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

progs has no credibility on any subject matter. He doesn't even know what a rolling average is. Don't bother debating with him - he just gets confused and it isn't good for his health Sad

who's debating???? he is merely a toy .....

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #70 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:29pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:27pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

progs has no credibility on any subject matter. He doesn't even know what a rolling average is. Don't bother debating with him - he just gets confused and it isn't good for his health Sad

who's debating???? he is merely a toy .....

I'm concerned for him though john Sad

With all the lying he has to constantly do I think he is getting his brain into a knot. And it will be very hard for him to unravel it Sad

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #71 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:30pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:29pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:27pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

progs has no credibility on any subject matter. He doesn't even know what a rolling average is. Don't bother debating with him - he just gets confused and it isn't good for his health Sad

who's debating???? he is merely a toy .....

I'm concerned for him though john Sad

With all the lying he has to constantly do I think he is getting his brain into a knot. And it will be very hard for him to unravel it Sad

i think it's already gotten beyond that .... there is no hope for him

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #72 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:26pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

I have to admit I don't understand a lot of the science behind the global warming issue, but, as with everything else I don't understand, I am happy to take the advice of the experts ... I was having a chat a few weeks ago with a scientist, and asked him why, if they say the science is beyond a doubt, are there so many sceptics ?.... his response was that the science is beyond a doubt, the sceptics just pick and choose small sections of the science and use that to try and discredit the science rather than looking at all the evidence as a whole.

I suspect that exactly what progs is doing ... ignoring the evidence he doesn't like and only seeing what he wants to see ..... my parents, when they were growing up back in their old country, had a name for people like progs ... he would have been referred to as the village idiot

back at band camp?

progs has no credibility on any subject matter. He doesn't even know what a rolling average is. Don't bother debating with him - he just gets confused and it isn't good for his health Sad

lol you just cant help yourself.

Go on, try not to debate me and see how far you get.

Ill give the lastwordwarrior a day.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #73 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:48pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:39pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:18pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:08pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Does anyone besides progs think that this isn't going to have an impact on storm surges.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/NYSLR.jpg

maybe they should dredge out some of the sand that has built up in the bay

That is not the sea

What's that progs, individual sea level readings can't be used to make generalisations. How very interesting.

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/images/CSIRO_GMSL_figure.jpg

But the oceans aren't expanding, are they, progs?

How very interesting to use a bay as your marker. Shame you cant use the actual ocean to speak of the ocean.

Deception is the name of the game in AGW land after all.

Let me see if I can find a graph. BRB

It appears that sheer ignorance is the name of your game.

MOTR posted a graph showing combined TOPEX/Poseiden and Jason-1, Jason-2 data - satellite data that has been mapping global ocean topography since 1992.

Global. Not in one bay. Global.

You told a lie.

Again.

When are you going to explain to us why sea levels are rising if it isn't die to global warming?
What is the cause?

Why do you continually claim that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, then run away like a little girl whenever you are asked to explain this ridiculous statement?

Why is sea level rising if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is global glacial mass balance decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is the arctic ice cap decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
How is it possible that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, when surface temperature measurements over the past 16 years have shown a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the long term average, for every single one of those 16 years?

Don't you think you should address some of these lies you have been caught telling?

I like that. Not one mention of co2.

We are still waiting for you to explain why you think the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

Don't run away.

Answer the question

Why is sea level rising, global glacial mass balance decreasing and arctic sea ice decreasing if the earth is not warming - and how can the earth not be warming when each of the past 16 years have shown a positive surface temperature anomaly over the long term average.

Why do you continually repeat David Rose's nonsense about no warming in 16 years?

Why do you repeat this nonsense then run away like a little girl when asked to explain it?

I dont think it. I know it from empirical data.

No you don't it from empirical data. Because there is no empirical data indicating that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

You read a David Rose article on some retarded blog and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The empirical data such as surface temperature, ocean temperature, sea level, glacial mass balance, arctic sea ice etc all indicate very clearly and unabiguously that the earth has most definitely been warming, especially in the past 16 years.

Stop telling lies little man.
Show us this "empirical data" that has led you to make a fool of yourself publically like this.

Earth has not warmed for 16 years. Get over it. I cant help it you dont like the information the MET office gives out.

Can anyone else smell burning pants?

But you disappoint me Progs. It is usually here you come out with your classic liar resonses like:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21^st, 2012 at 11:52am:

If you dont know how to research, then I am not about to give you the answer.

or

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:

what. lol. How about you research.

You have been caught lying again - give us some of that classic spineless evasion you are famous for

I have already given you the MET empirical data. I dont need to give it to you again becuase your brain functions different to everyone else.

LIAR

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Yanks start to catch on, will Abbott?
Reply #74 - Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:32pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:31pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:48pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:39pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:18pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 7:08pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:00pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 5:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:34pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Does anyone besides progs think that this isn't going to have an impact on storm surges.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/NYSLR.jpg

maybe they should dredge out some of the sand that has built up in the bay

That is not the sea

What's that progs, individual sea level readings can't be used to make generalisations. How very interesting.

http://www.cmar.csiro.au/sealevel/images/CSIRO_GMSL_figure.jpg

But the oceans aren't expanding, are they, progs?

How very interesting to use a bay as your marker. Shame you cant use the actual ocean to speak of the ocean.

Deception is the name of the game in AGW land after all.

Let me see if I can find a graph. BRB

It appears that sheer ignorance is the name of your game.

MOTR posted a graph showing combined TOPEX/Poseiden and Jason-1, Jason-2 data - satellite data that has been mapping global ocean topography since 1992.

Global. Not in one bay. Global.

You told a lie.

Again.

When are you going to explain to us why sea levels are rising if it isn't die to global warming?
What is the cause?

Why do you continually claim that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, then run away like a little girl whenever you are asked to explain this ridiculous statement?

Why is sea level rising if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is global glacial mass balance decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
Why is the arctic ice cap decreasing if the the earth has not warmed for 16 years?
How is it possible that the earth has not warmed for 16 years, when surface temperature measurements over the past 16 years have shown a positive temperature anomaly with respect to the long term average, for every single one of those 16 years?

Don't you think you should address some of these lies you have been caught telling?

I like that. Not one mention of co2.

We are still waiting for you to explain why you think the earth has not warmed in 16 years.

Don't run away.

Answer the question

Why is sea level rising, global glacial mass balance decreasing and arctic sea ice decreasing if the earth is not warming - and how can the earth not be warming when each of the past 16 years have shown a positive surface temperature anomaly over the long term average.

Why do you continually repeat David Rose's nonsense about no warming in 16 years?

Why do you repeat this nonsense then run away like a little girl when asked to explain it?

I dont think it. I know it from empirical data.

No you don't it from empirical data. Because there is no empirical data indicating that the earth has not been warming for the past 16 years.

You read a David Rose article on some retarded blog and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The empirical data such as surface temperature, ocean temperature, sea level, glacial mass balance, arctic sea ice etc all indicate very clearly and unabiguously that the earth has most definitely been warming, especially in the past 16 years.

Stop telling lies little man.
Show us this "empirical data" that has led you to make a fool of yourself publically like this.

Earth has not warmed for 16 years. Get over it. I cant help it you dont like the information the MET office gives out.

Can anyone else smell burning pants?

But you disappoint me Progs. It is usually here you come out with your classic liar resonses like:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21^st, 2012 at 11:52am:

If you dont know how to research, then I am not about to give you the answer.

or

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:

what. lol. How about you research.

You have been caught lying again - give us some of that classic spineless evasion you are famous for

I have already given you the MET empirical data. I dont need to give it to you again becuase your brain functions different to everyone else.

LIAR

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/average-temps.gif

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Back to top

IP Logged