Quote:Toronto: Muslim mother’s throat slit for letting children adopt Canadian culture.
Randjida Khairi was stabbed five times in her chest and back. She had her throat cut, a wound so ugly and deep that it sliced through her neck muscles, voicebox and windpipe -- stopping only at her spine.
......Mr. Khairi doesn’t dispute that he killed his wife.....The accused has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder.
......Ms. Khairi, the court was told, had been thinking of leaving her husband. She spoke to other people, complete strangers in some cases, about her plans.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/10/toronto-muslim-mothers-throat-slit-for-letting...The victim, Randjida Khairi, was seen by her husband as an apostate [i.e. in 'rebellion' against ISLAM], and in rebellion against her husbands authority, over his family.
In Mohammedan culture, in such circumstances,
the husband is the victim, and
his wife is THE CRIMINAL.
And in Mohammedan culture,
the actions of the husband [in an example like this] would be considered 'lawful', if the wife's 'rebellion' against ISLAM, and her against husband, was 'proven'.
n.b.
Apparently, this gruesome crime, although it was committed in Toronto, Canada, in 2008, has only being reported widely in the mainstream media, in recent days - BECAUSE IT HAS LATELY COME TO COURT.
posted comments....
Quote:DP111 | October 12, 2012 12:01 PM | Reply
The fault for this tragedy, and all the other Islamic barbarisms in the West, lies with us. Islam and Muslims, right through history, have been quite open of their intentions, by word and deed, towards the non-Muslim world.
If, despite all the warnings of history, of statesman such as Churchill and John Adams, we allowed them Muslims into the West, then we have no one to blame but ourselves.
Now it can be argued that the fault lies with the treasonous politicians. But the fact remains, that we re-elected them, or their kind, in election after election.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/10/toronto-muslim-mothers-throat-slit-for-letting...posted comments....
Quote:stephen | October 12, 2012 12:09 PM | Reply
Why in heaven's name do these wretches immigrate to western societies that they despise?
Why in heaven's name do western societies accept these wretches as immigrants when the cost to our societies is so huge and the benefits of admitting these people are nonexistent?
What is gained by admitting savage religious fanatics who despise your culture and will be dependent upon social welfare for their entire lives even as they curse and even attack the society that has granted them admission and support?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/10/toronto-muslim-mothers-throat-slit-for-letting...The immigration of Mohammedans, to the West, also brings every aspect of Mohammedan culture to the West.
Including the
perceived 'lawful' right of Mohammedans to slit the throats of apostate wives and children,
OR,
the
perceived 'lawful' right of Mohammedans to behead those who offend Mohammed [and their religion].
as per the declaration....
IMAGE

Sydney, 2012, Mohammedan street protests.
All Mohammedans, are MOSLEMS.
Just like those people on the streets of Sydney,
are Mohammedans.
Mohammedan = = a devotee of the cult of Mohammed.+++
What sort of barbarity is 'lawful' in Mohammedan culture ?
"O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers;
and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee;..."
Koran 33.50
"those whom your right hands possess" = = female captives, of the moslem war against the 'disbelievers'.
If you are a non-moslem, do you want your wives and daughters to be the [sex] slaves of Mohammedans ?
Because, it is 'lawful' to Mohammedans, for the wives and daughters of their enemies, to be their [sex] slaves ?
Here is an account of the deeds of ISLAM's 'prophet' , from the Hadith;
Mohammed and his companions went on a raiding party.
'and took captive some excellent Arab women', 'and we desired them',
'for we were suffering from the absence of our wives',
'So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them' [i.e. have non-consensual sex with their captive 'excellent Arab women']
'(but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them.' [i.e. Mohammed's companions intended to sell/ransom their captive 'excellent Arab women' back to their menfolk]
THAT ACCOUNT [OF NON CONSENSUAL SEX BY MOHAMMED AND HIS COMPANIONS] IS SOURCED FROM ISLAMIC TEXTS - THE HADITHThese ISLAMIC texts, below [among others], guide moslems in their daily conduct, in following their faith.
http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/hadith/muslim/008-smt.php#008.3371http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/hadith/muwatta/029-mmt.php#029.29.32.95http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/hadith/muwatta/036-mmt.php#036.36.23.24http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/077-sbt.php#008.077.600http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/046-sbt.php#003.046.718http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/059-sbt.php#005.059.459Those links [immediately above] are to authorised ISLAMIC Hadith texts.
I didn't authorise those ISLAMIC Hadith texts.
The MSA, the Moslem Students Association of America, authorised those ISLAMIC Hadith texts.
+++
This fulsome endorsement of Allah's 'Messenger',
by Allah, is found in the Koran....
"Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah. "
Koran 33.21
The words of
Mohammed, the Messenger of Allah.....
"...If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him."
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260