Australian Politics Forum - What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 62379 Here Gender:	Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Reply #45 - Sep 5^th, 2012 at 10:16pm What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Big call from supporters of those who have never stood for anything except the interests of their corporate mates.
Back to top	IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #46 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 5:04am

Prevailing wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:24pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:21pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:53am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:55am:

China represents nearly one third of total world emissions?

It's a stupid logic per capita.

BULLSHIT !

If a nation is host to half the world's population, it is common logic they would create half the world's emissions to be a mid-range "average" contributor to climate change

To make LESS than half is to be BETTER than "average"

Unless you are of that SUPREMIST ELITE demographic that would condemn developing nations to ONE LIGHT-BULB per shanty - for all eternity ?

I think you've nailed it. It's pure racism.

Which Australians are you calling racists...the non communists....? Grin

Is Avram now claiming to be Australian.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #47 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 5:08am

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 10:06pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:21pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:53am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:55am:

China represents nearly one third of total world emissions?

It's a stupid logic per capita.

BULLSHIT !

If a nation is host to half the world's population, it is common logic they would create half the world's emissions to be a mid-range "average" contributor to climate change

To make LESS than half is to be BETTER than "average"

Unless you are of that SUPREMIST ELITE demographic that would condemn developing nations to ONE LIGHT-BULB per shanty - for all eternity ?

I think you've nailed it. It's pure racism.

Rule -

When you are losing argument, shout "Racist!" at the top of your voice several times.

I remind you i am not a white aussie of yours, i dont have a racist view.

So why should people in India and China have less entitlement than us. Why are you happy for the people of India and China to carry most of the load? You are quite happy to make other people pay for your lifestyle. If it's not racism and your inability to empathise with the people of the developing world, perhaps you are motivated by naked self interest.

I believe you are a racist, Avram, and that is what blinds you to the position of other people. By the way your last sentence is oxymoronic. Making racist statements about Australians doesn't really help your claim that you are not a racist.

And dare I state the elephant in the room. Promulgating a Jewish stereotype is an out and out act of racism.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 6^th, 2012 at 5:36am by MOTR »

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 38129
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #48 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:16am

buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:53am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:55am:

China represents nearly one third of total world emissions?

It's a stupid logic per capita.

BULLSHIT !

If a nation is host to half the world's population, it is common logic they would create half the world's emissions to be a mid-range "average" contributor to climate change

To make LESS than half is to be BETTER than "average"

Unless you are of that SUPREMIST ELITE demographic that would condemn developing nations to ONE LIGHT-BULB per shanty - for all eternity ?

agree, yet the american position is exactly that (and i presume most of the west think that way),
this is going to create a lot of tension and indeed probably military build up in china and india. undoubtedly the industrial military complex (of which israel is an integral part) will benefit.
i do hope australia is smart enough to keep a low profile but with our "delusions of grandeur' types like rudd and carr running around trying to lecture the world on libya, syria, Cheesy

i fear their egos will draw them in.

personally, i'd be quite happy to build fighter planes for the chinese. good high tech growth market. the yanks didnt have any trouble selling their weapons to saddam.

Back to top

IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #49 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

Back to top

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 38129
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #50 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Back to top

IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #51 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:54am

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Totally incorrect there is no evidence for that...spare the rod and spoil the child...unless you want your children getting into knife fights in King Street, or \into Porn and later progressing into ripe lawless tyrants, torturers, sociopaths ect, appropriate discipline and traditional family role modeling is essential....what ever the faceless engineers want you to believe...Julia Gillard and Bob Carr - both violent tyrannical war mongers and thugs with no moral restraint are products of liberal permissive upbringing...they are spoiled brats...

Back to top

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 38129
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #52 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 8:05am

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Totally incorrect there is no evidence for that...spare the rod and spoil the child...unless you want your children getting into knife fights in King Street, or \into Porn and later progressing into ripe lawless tyrants, torturers, sociopaths ect, appropriate discipline and traditional family role modeling is essential....what ever the faceless engineers want you to believe...Julia Gillard and Bob Carr - both violent tyrannical war mongers and thugs with no moral restraint are products of liberal permissive upbringing...they are spoiled brats...

i'm beginning to doubt that you trust our learned academics in the social sciences prev. Wink

one of the problems seems to be that a good idea , like family first, got hijacked by the do gooder christian movement,

you need to start up a new party.
how about instead of family first we call it "government last"

Back to top

IP Logged

Avram Horowitz

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #53 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 9:32am

MOTR wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 5:08am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 10:06pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:21pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:53am:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:55am:

China represents nearly one third of total world emissions?

It's a stupid logic per capita.

BULLSHIT !

If a nation is host to half the world's population, it is common logic they would create half the world's emissions to be a mid-range "average" contributor to climate change

To make LESS than half is to be BETTER than "average"

Unless you are of that SUPREMIST ELITE demographic that would condemn developing nations to ONE LIGHT-BULB per shanty - for all eternity ?

I think you've nailed it. It's pure racism.

Rule -

When you are losing argument, shout "Racist!" at the top of your voice several times.

I remind you i am not a white aussie of yours, i dont have a racist view.

So why should people in India and China have less entitlement than us. Why are you happy for the people of India and China to carry most of the load? You are quite happy to make other people pay for your lifestyle. If it's not racism and your inability to empathise with the people of the developing world, perhaps you are motivated by naked self interest.

I believe you are a racist, Avram, and that is what blinds you to the position of other people. By the way your last sentence is oxymoronic. Making racist statements about Australians doesn't really help your claim that you are not a racist.

And dare I state the elephant in the room. Promulgating a Jewish stereotype is an out and out act of racism.

That's rubbish.
I will point out some obvious things-

1. The earth is harmed by emissions. China is the worlds worst polluter, they are also building coal power stations at a rate of 3 every week. From the 3 worlds worst polluters who make half of the whole world - only the USA is actively aiming to lower their output. Both China and India are not even trying.

2. A per capita argument classes Falkland Islands as a worse problem than China who pollute one third of the total. Falklands pollute 0.000001% of total.

3. A comment of something being "racist" is the last throw of a dice when no argument is there.

4. I hate to point out but you are from a developed world country and ignoring my USA citizenship, I am born and live in the developing world. It is a bit absurd for you to accuse me of being against the developing world. I look at the problem and want to fix. The problem is the worlds worst polluter is not even trying to reduce when everyone else is.

4. I come from a country which has invested more in new energy than most anyone. I know what is needed.

5. As for racist, I am middle eastern with heritage from east Europe and a people who were persecuted. I think I am not a racist.

Back to top

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #54 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 9:41am

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 8:05am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Totally incorrect there is no evidence for that...spare the rod and spoil the child...unless you want your children getting into knife fights in King Street, or \into Porn and later progressing into ripe lawless tyrants, torturers, sociopaths ect, appropriate discipline and traditional family role modeling is essential....what ever the faceless engineers want you to believe...Julia Gillard and Bob Carr - both violent tyrannical war mongers and thugs with no moral restraint are products of liberal permissive upbringing...they are spoiled brats...

i'm beginning to doubt that you trust our learned academics in the social sciences prev. Wink

one of the problems seems to be that a good idea , like family first, got hijacked by the do gooder christian movement,

you need to start up a new party.
how about instead of family first we call it "government last"

Any science and/or body of study by academic is a structured approach to observing an predicting behaviours

Social science is not like a 1+1 where you can accurately predict an outcome of 2 and no other results

Social science tries to accurately predict behaviours of 6 billion individuals by studying a sample space of 2000

Therefore on a predictability scale it's not as reliable as a 1+1

These engineers - be they electrical or social - tries to use these predicted outcomes on everyday events.

We can put man on the moon with more accuracy than we can predict the behaviours of humans.

We can split sub-atomic particles with more accuracy than we can strike at the social problem of world hunger, asylum seekers, wars, inequality etc.

My point?

Use the social sciences as a guide at best!

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 38129
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #55 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 9:48am

Maqqa wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 9:41am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 8:05am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Totally incorrect there is no evidence for that...spare the rod and spoil the child...unless you want your children getting into knife fights in King Street, or \into Porn and later progressing into ripe lawless tyrants, torturers, sociopaths ect, appropriate discipline and traditional family role modeling is essential....what ever the faceless engineers want you to believe...Julia Gillard and Bob Carr - both violent tyrannical war mongers and thugs with no moral restraint are products of liberal permissive upbringing...they are spoiled brats...

i'm beginning to doubt that you trust our learned academics in the social sciences prev. Wink

one of the problems seems to be that a good idea , like family first, got hijacked by the do gooder christian movement,

you need to start up a new party.
how about instead of family first we call it "government last"

Any science and/or body of study by academic is a structured approach to observing an predicting behaviours

Social science is not like a 1+1 where you can accurately predict an outcome of 2 and no other results

Social science tries to accurately predict behaviours of 6 billion individuals by studying a sample space of 2000

Therefore on a predictability scale it's not as reliable as a 1+1

These engineers - be they electrical or social - tries to use these predicted outcomes on everyday events.

We can put man on the moon with more accuracy than we can predict the behaviours of humans.

We can split sub-atomic particles with more accuracy than we can strike at the social problem of world hunger, asylum seekers, wars, inequality etc.

My point?

Use the social sciences as a guide at best!

EXCELLENT POINT

Back to top

IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #56 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 11:55am

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 8:05am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Totally incorrect there is no evidence for that...spare the rod and spoil the child...unless you want your children getting into knife fights in King Street, or \into Porn and later progressing into ripe lawless tyrants, torturers, sociopaths ect, appropriate discipline and traditional family role modeling is essential....what ever the faceless engineers want you to believe...Julia Gillard and Bob Carr - both violent tyrannical war mongers and thugs with no moral restraint are products of liberal permissive upbringing...they are spoiled brats...

i'm beginning to doubt that you trust our learned academics in the social sciences prev. Wink

one of the problems seems to be that a good idea , like family first, got hijacked by the do gooder christian movement,

you need to start up a new party.
how about instead of family first we call it "government last"

I am not representing a religious point of view even if my views are in agreement with some religious points of view...heck your views are in agreement with some religious points of view. Religious pints of view on this subject are as diverse as the rest of society. This is a firm demonstrable fact that increased violence and lack of restraint directly correlates with breakdown of traditional family units & parental failure to raise children in a properly structured positive environment where they learn the rewards of good behavior and the consequences of bad behavior...The social engineers obviously want to live in a world with no consequences for their actions...so did Adolf Hitler...

I am also not anti Government -I am pro constitutional democratic Government and the rule of law. I am anti faceless unelected central planning committees - especially foreign ones dictating the policy of our parliament. The sales of the strategic agricultural asset Cubbie Station to the Chinese Government for instance was ordered by the world bank and the trilateral commission and that is illegal and unacceptable...I challenge the Government to deny publicly they are not acting on foreign orders...and why are they trying to silence dissenters like Barnaby Joice?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 6^th, 2012 at 12:01pm by Prevailing »

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 38129
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #57 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 12:11pm

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 11:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 8:05am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Totally incorrect there is no evidence for that...spare the rod and spoil the child...unless you want your children getting into knife fights in King Street, or \into Porn and later progressing into ripe lawless tyrants, torturers, sociopaths ect, appropriate discipline and traditional family role modeling is essential....what ever the faceless engineers want you to believe...Julia Gillard and Bob Carr - both violent tyrannical war mongers and thugs with no moral restraint are products of liberal permissive upbringing...they are spoiled brats...

i'm beginning to doubt that you trust our learned academics in the social sciences prev. Wink

one of the problems seems to be that a good idea , like family first, got hijacked by the do gooder christian movement,

you need to start up a new party.
how about instead of family first we call it "government last"

I am not representing a religious point of view even if my views are in agreement with some religious points of view...heck your views are in agreement with some religious points of view. Religious pints of view on this subject are as diverse as the rest of society. This is a firm demonstrable fact that increased violence and lack of restraint directly correlates with breakdown of traditional family units & parental failure to raise children in a properly structured positive environment where they learn the rewards of good behavior and the consequences of bad behavior...The social engineers obviously want to live in a world with no consequences for their actions...so did Adolf Hitler...

I am also not anti Government -I am pro constitutional democratic Government and the rule of law. I am anti faceless unelected central planning committees - especially foreign ones dictating the policy of our parliament. The sales of the strategic agricultural asset Cubbie Station to the Chinese Government for instance was ordered by the world bank and the trilateral commission and that is illegal and unacceptable...I challenge the Government to deny publicly they are not acting on foreign orders...and why are they trying to silence dissenters like Barnaby Joice?

being as it does have the biggest water allocation on the beloved murray darling, i was a bit surprised by the sale. should be interesting if the government decide to cut back the water allocation to the chinese . they may be slightly harder to negotiate with than the local farmers.

prev , i cant comment on the new world order. i think its good you get people questioning the order of things.
but i do like data,

now heres some data for you that may interest you, natural gas from qld is sold to the chinese at a cost that is approxiamtely 8 % of the rate it is sold to australian consumers.

keep digging , be carful prev, you may be joining mr assange in gautmo if you actually uncover something

Back to top

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 30069
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #58 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 1:37pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 8:10pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 5^th, 2012 at 7:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:55pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:51pm:

Why should more developed countries be allowed to maintain higher levels of pollution?

Whoah, here come the spanners!

Avram can't deal with a world that requires his exulted race to take a backward step me suspects!

GO GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED, YOU LITTLE BEAUTY!

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyY!!

You're an a$$hole, making light of the victims of the worst terrorist attack in history. You're also a racist. You ought to be permanently banned from this forum, you lowlife piece of $hit. I've deleted the picture out of respect for the dead and reported you. If you're not banned, I'm reporting you and your post (along with the forum administrator, who refuses to do anything) to the federal Communications Ombudsman because I'm simply not prepared to put up with any more of your shallow crap.

I see that the post by deathridesahorse has not been removed. Given this, I will be reporting that post to the telecommunications ombudsman tomorrow morning. There is no excuse for such a post and no excuse for allowing it to remain on this forum.

softys vote for ______________________ !!! Grin

I feel sorry for your mother, having given birth to such a depraved, racist, sadistic and cowardly non-entity.

Back to top

IP Logged

Prevailing

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #59 - Sep 6^th, 2012 at 3:10pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 12:11pm:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 11:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 8:05am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

aquascoot wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

Prevailing wrote on Sep 6^th, 2012 at 7:44am:

The shadow, unelected communist central planning committees in the corporations and bureaucracy make war with Iran and China inevitable. The best we can hope for is that parents and schools reintroduce corporal; punishment to curb barbaric violent tendencies in bullies and the violent to instill civilized disciple and restraint in their behavior....

NOW NOW PREV, theres plenty of evidence that corporal punishment (if OVERUSED) creates bullies and increases violent tendencies. not saying it should be banned but you will need to complete a degree in the behavioural sciences before commenting(though i suppose you have to trust their findings)

Totally incorrect there is no evidence for that...spare the rod and spoil the child...unless you want your children getting into knife fights in King Street, or \into Porn and later progressing into ripe lawless tyrants, torturers, sociopaths ect, appropriate discipline and traditional family role modeling is essential....what ever the faceless engineers want you to believe...Julia Gillard and Bob Carr - both violent tyrannical war mongers and thugs with no moral restraint are products of liberal permissive upbringing...they are spoiled brats...

i'm beginning to doubt that you trust our learned academics in the social sciences prev. Wink

one of the problems seems to be that a good idea , like family first, got hijacked by the do gooder christian movement,

you need to start up a new party.
how about instead of family first we call it "government last"

I am not representing a religious point of view even if my views are in agreement with some religious points of view...heck your views are in agreement with some religious points of view. Religious pints of view on this subject are as diverse as the rest of society. This is a firm demonstrable fact that increased violence and lack of restraint directly correlates with breakdown of traditional family units & parental failure to raise children in a properly structured positive environment where they learn the rewards of good behavior and the consequences of bad behavior...The social engineers obviously want to live in a world with no consequences for their actions...so did Adolf Hitler...

I am also not anti Government -I am pro constitutional democratic Government and the rule of law. I am anti faceless unelected central planning committees - especially foreign ones dictating the policy of our parliament. The sales of the strategic agricultural asset Cubbie Station to the Chinese Government for instance was ordered by the world bank and the trilateral commission and that is illegal and unacceptable...I challenge the Government to deny publicly they are not acting on foreign orders...and why are they trying to silence dissenters like Barnaby Joice?

being as it does have the biggest water allocation on the beloved murray darling, i was a bit surprised by the sale. should be interesting if the government decide to cut back the water allocation to the chinese . they may be slightly harder to negotiate with than the local farmers.

prev , i cant comment on the new world order. i think its good you get people questioning the order of things.
but i do like data,

now heres some data for you that may interest you, natural gas from qld is sold to the chinese at a cost that is approxiamtely 8 % of the rate it is sold to australian consumers.

keep digging , be carful prev, you may be joining mr assange in gautmo if you actually uncover something

Make no mistake...I will keep digging and pressing for accountability and transparency - in the national interest and according to the Law of the land...you wont get me for disclosing information that compromises the legal right to security of Australian citizens according to our constitutional law and that is the only law I recognize...

Back to top

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men

IP Logged