Australian Politics Forum - What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:12pm They've tried molesting whales and humping trees They got lucky because of a desperate Gillard trying to hang onto power But what happens post-2013 when the ALP dump the Greens like a carbon emitting t#rd??!!
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Reply #1 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:15pm UM, WHAT DOES FREEDIVER HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS WHEN I GET AWAY WITH BUGGER ALL AND HE KNOWS IT!??????!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Reply #2 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:16pm There is bipartisan support for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The greens will have no problem finding allies.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:59pm by MOTR » Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

Avram Horowitz

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #3 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:27pm

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:16pm:

There is bipartisan support for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The greens will have no problem finding an allie.

Everyone in the world wants this.
Unfortunately 2 of the 3 biggest polluters want to increase instead of decrease and make the rest of us all fix it.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #4 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:36pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:27pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:16pm:

There is bipartisan support for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The greens will have no problem finding an allie.

Everyone in the world wants this.
Unfortunately 2 of the 3 biggest polluters want to increase instead of decrease and make the rest of us all fix it.

Business is Business

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Reply #5 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:39pm Brilliant. Since we both recognise there is a problem how about we focus on a path to solution. If you had absolute power, Avram, how would you solve this problem?
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

Avram Horowitz

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #6 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:45pm

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:39pm:

Brilliant. Since we both recognise there is a problem how about we focus on a path to solution.

If you had absolute power, Avram, how would you solve this problem?

Every country needs to be 80% of their total 2000 levels and then work down from this point.
Down to 1990 levels etc.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Reply #7 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:51pm Why should more developed countries be allowed to maintain higher levels of pollution? As the major contributors to the problem shouldn't they carry a larger responsibility for fixing the problem. That's the Australian way, Avram.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

gold_medal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3897 Gender:	Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed? Reply #8 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:54pm MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:16pm: There is bipartisan support for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The greens will have no problem finding an allie. They couldnt find their own bum. NOBODY likes them. labor and liberals hate their guts and guess what... thats all that counts.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #9 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:55pm

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:51pm:

Why should more developed countries be allowed to maintain higher levels of pollution?

Whoah, here come the spanners!

Avram can't deal with a world that requires his exulted race to take a backward step me suspects!

GO GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED, YOU LITTLE BEAUTY!

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyY!!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #10 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:56pm

gold_medal wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:54pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:16pm:

There is bipartisan support for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The greens will have no problem finding an allie.

They couldnt find their own bum. NOBODY likes them. labor and liberals hate their guts and guess what... thats all that counts.

Abbott was happy to vote with them to protect the rights of refugees. If the cause is right you'll always find allies.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

gold_medal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3897
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #11 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 9:04pm

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:56pm:

gold_medal wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:54pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:16pm:

There is bipartisan support for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The greens will have no problem finding an allie.

They couldnt find their own bum. NOBODY likes them. labor and liberals hate their guts and guess what... thats all that counts.

Abbott was happy to vote with them to protect the rights of refugees. If the cause is right you'll always find allies.

what political planet did you just arrive from? political kindergarten world?? But your biggest naivete is 'the cause id right' when put up by the Greens. Frankly, if the greens support it I would automatically assume it is dumb unless eveidence was given to prove otherwise. They are ideologically driven and wouldnt know pragmatism if they fell on it. And they arent real good on the central idea of democracy (we the voters - a geunine majority - get to choose what we want done in our country)

Back to top

IP Logged

Avram Horowitz

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #12 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 9:11pm

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:51pm:

Why should more developed countries be allowed to maintain higher levels of pollution?

As the major contributors to the problem shouldn't they carry a larger responsibility for fixing the problem.

That's the Australian way, Avram.

I am talking about fixing the problem - the problem is fixed when you bring down the pollution of the world's worst polluters.

China, USA and India make up half the world pollution. Everyone else is the other half.

From the 3 there, only 1 is reducting or even trying to reduce.

You fix the problem - you hit the ones who is making the most of the problem.
THAT is the Israeli way,

I take my way over yours.

Back to top

IP Logged

Avram Horowitz

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #13 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 9:12pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:55pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:51pm:

Why should more developed countries be allowed to maintain higher levels of pollution?

Whoah, here come the spanners!

Avram can't deal with a world that requires his exulted race to take a backward step me suspects!

GO GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED, YOU LITTLE BEAUTY!

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6223/161/1600/jumper11.jpg

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyY!!

I think you are insane

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: What will Greens stand for when CT is repealed?
Reply #14 - Sep 4^th, 2012 at 9:16pm

Avram Horowitz wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 9:12pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:55pm:

MOTR wrote on Sep 4^th, 2012 at 8:51pm:

Why should more developed countries be allowed to maintain higher levels of pollution?

Whoah, here come the spanners!

Avram can't deal with a world that requires his exulted race to take a backward step me suspects!

GO GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED, YOU LITTLE BEAUTY!

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6223/161/1600/jumper11.jpg

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyY!!

I think you are insane

>> I am talking about fixing the problem - the problem is fixed when you bring down the pollution of the world's worst polluters.

China, USA and India make up half the world pollution. Everyone else is the other half.

From the 3 there, only 1 is reducting or even trying to reduce.

You fix the problem - you hit the ones who is making the most of the problem.
THAT is the Israeli way,

I take my way over yours<<

I THINK YOU'RE A TRYHARD TOUGH GUY TRYING TO HIDE BEHIND IMPOTENT NUCLEAR WEAPONS!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged