Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Nanny state dictating what we must wear (Read 12429 times)
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Aug 16th, 2012 at 1:57pm
 
Quote:
Australia's 1.3 million motorcycle riders would be forced by law to wear fluoro jackets under proposals splitting the biker and scooter community.
A country policeman has started a national battle over the possibility of compulsory hi-visibility clothing as part of a bid to make riding safer and reduce the toll of about 200 deaths a year from motorcycle accidents.
One meeting of riders tonight is likely to start a national rebellion against forcing motorcycle licence holders, including the 750,000 who use their machines every week, into day-glo safety wardrobes.
Anger over the proposal for mandatory protective clothing is nearing the level of fury reached when daytime headlight use was pushed as a safety measure 25 years ago.
A Victorian Government road safety inquiry will consider the hi-viz option and, if adopted, other states could be expected to follow.
The public debate began when the fluoro idea was pushed by Senior Sergeant Bill Gore of the Wangaratta Highway Patrol, a 35-year police motorbike veteran.
Opponents now refer to it as "Gore's law", although it's a long way from being legally enforceable.
Sgt Gore recommended the measure at a June meeting of locals on motorcycle safety. He denies a report he told the meeting it would become law, but has not retreated from endorsing the idea.
"If a motorcyclist can make himself more visible he's less likely to be hit," Sgt Gore told ABC radio.
"I would encourage motorcyclist to wear as much high-visibility gear as they could. I wear it myself, and if it can be done, that should be the choice."
Damien Codognotto, Melbourne-based spokesman for the Independent Riders' Group, is fighting compulsory fluoro because it could affect the liability of a bike or scooter rider after an accident.
And there was no evident the jackets would add to safety.
"Gore's law is likely to change the legal standing of motorcycle and scooter riders and their liability after a crash regardless of who was at fault," Mr Codognotto told news.com.au.
"We went through all this about 25 years ago with the lights-on ADR (Australian Design Rules).
"Compulsory third party insurers are looking to reduce payouts for victims of road trauma who were on two wheels (who are) seen as easy targets for reduced compensation. That is not only unjust considering the premiums and taxes we pay, it is disastrous for riders' families."
He said there had not been much research into the issue and the collection of crash-site data had been patchy.
One bike rider named Pee Wee, from a Gold Coast Christian motorcycle club, says it's others on the road who need high visibility as they cause most accidents.
"Maybe we should fluoro all the pedestrians and P-plate drivers and riders," Pee Wee said.


I've got a better idea - how about drivers just pay attention?
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26550
Australia
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #1 - Aug 16th, 2012 at 2:14pm
 
Haha well in a place where ppl want to ban the burka it opens the door to be told yourselves what to wear.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #2 - Aug 16th, 2012 at 2:20pm
 
I don't want to ban the burka either. 
I'd rather individuals have the right to refuse entry or service to anyone wearing them, if they so choose.

But then, I have actual principles which apply to all, not just designated victim groups.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26550
Australia
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #3 - Aug 16th, 2012 at 2:32pm
 
... wrote on Aug 16th, 2012 at 2:20pm:
I don't want to ban the burka either. 
I'd rather individuals have the right to refuse entry or service to anyone wearing them, if they so choose.

But then, I have actual principles which apply to all, not just designated victim groups.


I didnt mean you in particular but its the environment where if clothing can be banned it can be made mandatory too.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #4 - Aug 16th, 2012 at 9:40pm
 
Dark skinned people in dark clothes are very hard to see, especially on a moonless night.

Fluoro burqas should be mandatory, to reduce the horrendous number of Muslim women killed on the roads:

Quote:
Saudi Arabia has recorded the highest rate of road accident fatalities at the Arab
and world levels
, according to a report issued by the World Health Organisation (WHO)

...

(Fluoro burqas - artist's impression)


Get with the program, Wes.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #5 - Aug 16th, 2012 at 10:25pm
 
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2012 at 9:40pm:
Saudi Arabia has recorded the highest rate of road accident fatalities at the Arab and world levels, according to a report issued by the World Health Organisation (WHO)



Didn't they just start letting women behind the wheel?

I wonder if thats got something to do with it.... 
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #6 - Aug 16th, 2012 at 10:40pm
 
That and the old saying: women should be seen, not heard. It saves lives.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #7 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 1:30am
 
... wrote on Aug 16th, 2012 at 1:57pm:
Quote:
Australia's 1.3 million motorcycle riders would be forced by law to wear fluoro jackets under proposals splitting the biker and scooter community.
A country policeman has started a national battle over the possibility of compulsory hi-visibility clothing as part of a bid to make riding safer and reduce the toll of about 200 deaths a year from motorcycle accidents.
One meeting of riders tonight is likely to start a national rebellion against forcing motorcycle licence holders, including the 750,000 who use their machines every week, into day-glo safety wardrobes.
Anger over the proposal for mandatory protective clothing is nearing the level of fury reached when daytime headlight use was pushed as a safety measure 25 years ago.
A Victorian Government road safety inquiry will consider the hi-viz option and, if adopted, other states could be expected to follow.
The public debate began when the fluoro idea was pushed by Senior Sergeant Bill Gore of the Wangaratta Highway Patrol, a 35-year police motorbike veteran.
Opponents now refer to it as "Gore's law", although it's a long way from being legally enforceable.
Sgt Gore recommended the measure at a June meeting of locals on motorcycle safety. He denies a report he told the meeting it would become law, but has not retreated from endorsing the idea.
"If a motorcyclist can make himself more visible he's less likely to be hit," Sgt Gore told ABC radio.
"I would encourage motorcyclist to wear as much high-visibility gear as they could. I wear it myself, and if it can be done, that should be the choice."
Damien Codognotto, Melbourne-based spokesman for the Independent Riders' Group, is fighting compulsory fluoro because it could affect the liability of a bike or scooter rider after an accident.
And there was no evident the jackets would add to safety.
"Gore's law is likely to change the legal standing of motorcycle and scooter riders and their liability after a crash regardless of who was at fault," Mr Codognotto told news.com.au.
"We went through all this about 25 years ago with the lights-on ADR (Australian Design Rules).
"Compulsory third party insurers are looking to reduce payouts for victims of road trauma who were on two wheels (who are) seen as easy targets for reduced compensation. That is not only unjust considering the premiums and taxes we pay, it is disastrous for riders' families."
He said there had not been much research into the issue and the collection of crash-site data had been patchy.
One bike rider named Pee Wee, from a Gold Coast Christian motorcycle club, says it's others on the road who need high visibility as they cause most accidents.
"Maybe we should fluoro all the pedestrians and P-plate drivers and riders," Pee Wee said.


I've got a better idea - how about drivers just pay attention? 

Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #8 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 1:33am
 
... wrote on Aug 16th, 2012 at 1:57pm:
Quote:
Australia's 1.3 million motorcycle riders would be forced by law to wear fluoro jackets under proposals splitting the biker and scooter community.
A country policeman has started a national battle over the possibility of compulsory hi-visibility clothing as part of a bid to make riding safer and reduce the toll of about 200 deaths a year from motorcycle accidents.
One meeting of riders tonight is likely to start a national rebellion against forcing motorcycle licence holders, including the 750,000 who use their machines every week, into day-glo safety wardrobes.
Anger over the proposal for mandatory protective clothing is nearing the level of fury reached when daytime headlight use was pushed as a safety measure 25 years ago.
A Victorian Government road safety inquiry will consider the hi-viz option and, if adopted, other states could be expected to follow.
The public debate began when the fluoro idea was pushed by Senior Sergeant Bill Gore of the Wangaratta Highway Patrol, a 35-year police motorbike veteran.
Opponents now refer to it as "Gore's law", although it's a long way from being legally enforceable.
Sgt Gore recommended the measure at a June meeting of locals on motorcycle safety. He denies a report he told the meeting it would become law, but has not retreated from endorsing the idea.
"If a motorcyclist can make himself more visible he's less likely to be hit," Sgt Gore told ABC radio.
"I would encourage motorcyclist to wear as much high-visibility gear as they could. I wear it myself, and if it can be done, that should be the choice."
Damien Codognotto, Melbourne-based spokesman for the Independent Riders' Group, is fighting compulsory fluoro because it could affect the liability of a bike or scooter rider after an accident.
And there was no evident the jackets would add to safety.
"Gore's law is likely to change the legal standing of motorcycle and scooter riders and their liability after a crash regardless of who was at fault," Mr Codognotto told news.com.au.
"We went through all this about 25 years ago with the lights-on ADR (Australian Design Rules).
"Compulsory third party insurers are looking to reduce payouts for victims of road trauma who were on two wheels (who are) seen as easy targets for reduced compensation. That is not only unjust considering the premiums and taxes we pay, it is disastrous for riders' families."
He said there had not been much research into the issue and the collection of crash-site data had been patchy.
One bike rider named Pee Wee, from a Gold Coast Christian motorcycle club, says it's others on the road who need high visibility as they cause most accidents.
"Maybe we should fluoro all the pedestrians and P-plate drivers and riders," Pee Wee said.


I've got a better idea - how about drivers just pay attention


Good luck with that....people simply WON'T..unless it affects them...
Only people who have family members that ride, even notice bikes or scooters...

My father always said that every driver should, during their L or P plate years, be forced to ride a bike, and drive a truck.....just so they'd have some hope of understanding other road users.....I don't think he was wrong.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #9 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 5:18pm
 
Yeah.  I know...but I can still dream.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
bobbythefap1
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #10 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 8:08pm
 
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2012 at 9:40pm:
[quote]Saudi Arabia has recorded the highest rate of road accident fatalities at the Arab
and world levels
,



Back to top
 

A day without sunshine is like night.
 
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5486
Gender: female
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #11 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 11:24pm
 
f*ck yeah!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bobbythefap1
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #12 - Aug 22nd, 2012 at 11:39am
 
JC Denton wrote on Aug 21st, 2012 at 11:24pm:
f*ck yeah!

Fancy doing that to a statesman.. 0.58 seconds looks like 200km as in the title
Then straight after the reasonably priced car from top gear
Back to top
 

A day without sunshine is like night.
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #13 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 12:21am
 
Nanny state needs to take a step back and re-assess it's own long term targets IMO. It's become a victim to it's own methods.

As an example of what I'm saying:

If you point yourself to a known destination far off into the distance, then you automatically know the path that you must take and adjust accordingly.

It's nigh on impossible to be pushed and shoved at every point along a journey towards a pre-determined destination and be expected to make it there in one piece.

A little guidance can be helpful, but most times, nobody really cares to hear the advice of others.

So save your advice Nan and show me something of general use to me.

Our nanny state will only show the general public how to be incompetent, and then they'll wonder why they keep trying to wipe the blood from their useless enslaved control-ass hands.

Those who will not allow human nature as it is, are more guilty for every death than one who was not capable of being bounced around from his/her objective and forced into mistakes which most probably would not have happened when left to their own devices.








Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 11th, 2012 at 12:39am by Amadd »  
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #14 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 8:59am
 

It's not new.

The more foolhardy of our politicians have been pushing for this since the 1970s.

Well past time we told these mofos in no uncertain terms that enough is enough!!!
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 77830
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #15 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 9:25am
 
I'm sure the Gypsy jokers, Bandidoes and hells angels guys will all wear flouro ... it'd be worth it just to see them roaring through town on their Harleys with high vis vests on .... i can just see it now ....

Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60277
Here
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #16 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 9:35am
 
Next thing someone will insist they wear a helmet.

Just stupid.

Its only natural selection at work - Put the dumbest people on the roads on the smallest fastest machines with the least protection
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #17 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 10:10am
 
Dnarever wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 9:35am:
Next thing someone will insist they wear a helmet.

Just stupid.

Its only natural selection at work - Put the dumbest people on the roads on the smallest fastest machines with the least protection



You're a dickhead.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60277
Here
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #18 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 10:19am
 
... wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 10:10am:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 9:35am:
Next thing someone will insist they wear a helmet.

Just stupid.

Its only natural selection at work - Put the dumbest people on the roads on the smallest fastest machines with the least protection



You're a dickhead.



At least you are well qualified to make the assessment.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #19 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 10:41am
 


Charlie don't surf.

Habibi do....

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #20 - Sep 11th, 2012 at 11:59pm
 
Is that an ad for sandles?

I'll take a pair. Going by that vid., one pair will see me out.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26550
Australia
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #21 - Sep 12th, 2012 at 4:58am
 
Dnarever wrote on Sep 11th, 2012 at 9:35am:
Next thing someone will insist they wear a helmet.

Just stupid.

Its only natural selection at work - Put the dumbest people on the roads on the smallest fastest machines with the least protection


Heh. You think surfers should wear helmets too? And ppl in wheelchairs?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
fractalign
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 254
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #22 - May 1st, 2014 at 10:09pm
 
This is a stupid idea because it will create a false sense of security for riders and drivers alike.  Seriously if you can't see a motorcyclist when you are out driving then you should not be allowed on the road. Making law abiding riders wear one of these stupid vests won't change the habits of stupid car drivers who seem oblivious to the movements of riders anyway.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MumboJumbo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1474
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #23 - Nov 19th, 2014 at 6:43pm
 
fractalign wrote on May 1st, 2014 at 10:09pm:
This is a stupid idea because it will create a false sense of security for riders and drivers alike.  Seriously if you can't see a motorcyclist when you are out driving then you should not be allowed on the road. Making law abiding riders wear one of these stupid vests won't change the habits of stupid car drivers who seem oblivious to the movements of riders anyway.


Or if you're a cyclist, don't drive like an idiot. Stay out of people's blind spots. Don't ride down the middle of the road until traffic's stopped. And so on.
Back to top
 

See Profile For Update wrote on Jan 3rd, 2015 at 2:58pm:
Why the bugger did I get stuck on a planet chalked full of imbeciles?
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #24 - Nov 29th, 2014 at 5:53am
 
Get rid of helmet laws.  Get rid of all laws concerning motorcyclists.  But first have all drivers sign a statement that they understand they will be refused any medical care in the case of an accident that is funded, in any way, by the tax payer.
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 112902
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #25 - Nov 29th, 2014 at 6:07am
 
AiA wrote on Nov 29th, 2014 at 5:53am:
Get rid of helmet laws.  Get rid of all laws concerning motorcyclists.  But first have all drivers sign a statement that they understand they will be refused any medical care in the case of an accident that is funded, in any way, by the tax payer.


Yes - how can you be cool like the Fonz or the Easy Riders  - riding without a helmet?


...


...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7062
Gender: female
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #26 - Nov 29th, 2014 at 10:42am
 
I just got my license and am happy to wear a helmet.

Bright colours suit my complexion so I don't even mind fluorescent vests.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 112902
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #27 - Nov 29th, 2014 at 11:46am
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 29th, 2014 at 10:42am:
I just got my license and am happy to wear a helmet.

Bright colours suit my complexion so I don't even mind fluorescent vests.



But look at the pic -

how cool is it that Jack Nicholson has a helmet behind him & doesn't wear it!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7062
Gender: female
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #28 - Nov 29th, 2014 at 11:49am
 
I suspect that teenaged boys might find that cool. I think it's a bit silly. And the bike itself is revolting.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 112902
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #29 - Nov 29th, 2014 at 12:00pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Nov 29th, 2014 at 11:49am:
I suspect that teenaged boys might find that cool. I think it's a bit silly. And the bike itself is revolting.



I thought it looked fantastic when I was a teenager.

Now I was hoping for a few bites.  Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #30 - Dec 8th, 2014 at 3:58am
 
AiA wrote on Nov 29th, 2014 at 5:53am:
Get rid of helmet laws.  Get rid of all laws concerning motorcyclists.  But first have all drivers sign a statement that they understand they will be refused any medical care in the case of an accident that is funded, in any way, by the tax payer.


Reasonable point, but to be fair, you'd allow pro-rata funding. Then I'd still take the risk if I so desired.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Phemanderac
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #31 - Jan 13th, 2015 at 4:36pm
 
I always have thought that the simplest solution would be to teach people to drive/ride properly in the first place before unleashing them onto the community....

Never gonna happen though, too  much money in insurance.

Oh, and also, change the culture of driving being a right of passage to it being a privilege you have to earn and retest for at regular intervals. Something a bit more advanced that a reverse park, hill start and three point turn though eh?
Back to top
 

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: Nanny state dictating what we must wear
Reply #32 - Jan 14th, 2015 at 3:34pm
 
Making motorcyclists wear fluro or hi-vis vests or gear is stupid.

When riding a motorcycle the only person looking out for your safety is you.

Ride like you're invisible and every front bottom out there in a car is out to kill you and you'll have a chance.

Throw any of the responsibility for your safety onto the drivers around you and you'll soon be laying in a hospital bed mewing like a b!tch about how "waaaaa... they didn't see me.... it's their fault".
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print