Australian Politics Forum - Who wants peace?

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Who wants peace?
Reply #60 - Aug 10^th, 2012 at 10:55pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 10^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Aug 10^th, 2012 at 10:04pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 6:55am:

Israel wouldn't even allow these ppl to negotiate
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/05/us-israel-palestinians-summit-idUSBRE8...

Quote:

"The goal of this decision, which was issued at the highest political echelons in Israel, is to thwart the efforts of the Palestinian leadership to achieve more successes for the benefit of Palestinians and its efforts to end the occupation," Palestinian foreign minister Riyad al-Malki told reporters.

So they admit it is an "occupation". Avram doesnt but Israel does. Its illegal but the UN is following orders . . . .

SOB

What people is that?
There wasn't a Jordanian amongst any of the monkeybums.
And that's who the Israel's seized the West Bank from in 1967 when the Jordanians failed to successfully make a surprise attack on Israel.
And the Jordanians aren't complaining.

hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha

Intellegent response yet again eh.

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Who wants peace?
Reply #61 - Aug 10^th, 2012 at 11:42pm

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Aug 10^th, 2012 at 10:55pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Aug 10^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Aug 10^th, 2012 at 10:04pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 6:55am:

Israel wouldn't even allow these ppl to negotiate
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/05/us-israel-palestinians-summit-idUSBRE8...

Quote:

"The goal of this decision, which was issued at the highest political echelons in Israel, is to thwart the efforts of the Palestinian leadership to achieve more successes for the benefit of Palestinians and its efforts to end the occupation," Palestinian foreign minister Riyad al-Malki told reporters.

So they admit it is an "occupation". Avram doesnt but Israel does. Its illegal but the UN is following orders . . . .

SOB

What people is that?
There wasn't a Jordanian amongst any of the monkeybums.
And that's who the Israel's seized the West Bank from in 1967 when the Jordanians failed to successfully make a surprise attack on Israel.
And the Jordanians aren't complaining.

hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha

Intellegent response yet again eh.

ignorance is bliss

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26531
Australia

Re: Who wants peace?
Reply #62 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 5:17am

brumbie wrote on Aug 10^th, 2012 at 10:20pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 6^th, 2012 at 6:55am:

Israel wouldn't even allow these ppl to negotiate

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/05/us-israel-palestinians-summit-idUSBRE8...

Quote:

"The goal of this decision, which was issued at the highest political echelons in Israel, is to thwart the efforts of the Palestinian leadership to achieve more successes for the benefit of Palestinians and its efforts to end the occupation," Palestinian foreign minister Riyad al-Malki told reporters.

So they admit it is an "occupation". Avram doesnt but Israel does. Its illegal but the UN is following orders . . . .

SOB

Spot on his anti jewish role again i see

a typical "weekend" discussion for the guy that has a signature at the bottom of his posts as such:

"Whenever legitimate concerns are raised about Israel or a Jew, in 90% of occasions someone will be called 'anti-Semitic' to divert/ and/or guilt trip people/s into forgiving/forgetting issues raised."

jailtime in europe but not here

In europe its illegal to raise legitimate issues? Do you agree with laws that are against free speech and stop you raising legitimate concerns?

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Avram Horowitz Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3153 Australia Gender:	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #63 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:21pm May I take this moment to again say there was a proposed resolution on the occupied territory settlements which did not pass and failed at the security council. The world community could not agree and refuse to condemn Israel.
Back to top	IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #64 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:23pm Avram Horowitz wrote on Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:21pm: May I take this moment to again say there was a proposed resolution on the occupied territory settlements which did not pass and failed at the security council. The world community could not agree and refuse to condemn Israel. What was the vote, Avram?
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

Avram Horowitz

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Who wants peace?
Reply #65 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:25pm

MOTR wrote on Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:23pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:21pm:

May I take this moment to again say there was a proposed resolution on the occupied territory settlements which did not pass and failed at the security council.

The world community could not agree and refuse to condemn Israel.

What was the vote, Avram?

This Resolution demands Israel cease building in the occupied West Bank and that all settlements built since the accord are illegal.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Who wants peace?
Reply #66 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:27pm

And how did the actual vote go?

14 to 1 wasn't it. Vetoed by the US, once again.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/usvetoes.html

Makes for very interesting reading.

The US might have vetoed for political reasons, but here is what they really think.

Quote:

In explaining her veto, US Ambassador Susan E. Rice said the vote should not be misunderstood as support for settlement activity.

“On the contrary, we reject in the strongest terms the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlement activity,” she declared. “Continued settlement activity violates Israel’s international commitments, devastates trust between the parties, and threatens the prospects for peace…

“Every potential action must be measured against one overriding standard: will it move the parties closer to negotiations and an agreement? Unfortunately, this draft resolution risks hardening the positions of both sides. It could encourage the parties to stay out of negotiations and, if and when they did resume, to return to the Security Council whenever they reach an impasse.”

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:41pm by MOTR »

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

Avram Horowitz Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3153 Australia Gender:	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #67 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 7:46pm It was a biased resolution.
Back to top	IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #68 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 8:24pm Biased against the aggressor.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

Avram Horowitz Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3153 Australia Gender:	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #69 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 8:28pm That language does not help the situation. That is the language of terrorists like Hamas
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 112109 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #70 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 8:47pm Avram Horowitz wrote on Aug 11^th, 2012 at 8:28pm: That language does not help the situation. That is the language of terrorists like Hamas Yes - you gave back Gaza & got over 10,000 rockets back as thanks.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 98658	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #71 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 10:00pm Nothing wrong with a few rockets up the Gaza, Bobbie. We all want a piece, isn't it.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 112109 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #72 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 10:23pm Karnal wrote on Aug 11^th, 2012 at 10:00pm: Nothing wrong with a few rockets up the Gaza, Bobbie. We all want a piece, isn't it. What a poof.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 98658	Re: Who wants peace? Reply #73 - Aug 11^th, 2012 at 10:51pm Bobby. wrote on Aug 11^th, 2012 at 10:23pm: Karnal wrote on Aug 11^th, 2012 at 10:00pm: Nothing wrong with a few rockets up the Gaza, Bobbie. We all want a piece, isn't it. What a poof. Poof? What did I say?
Back to top	IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Who wants peace?
Reply #74 - Aug 12^th, 2012 at 12:09am

In explaining her veto, US Ambassador Susan E. Rice said the vote should not be misunderstood as support for settlement activity.

“On the contrary, we reject in the strongest terms the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlement activity,” she declared. “Continued settlement activity violates Israel’s international commitments, devastates trust between the parties, and threatens the prospects for peace…

_____________

yes this sounds like a terrorist regime

keep ever vigilant against these aggressors

one may suggest

namaste

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged