Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 24
Send Topic Print
Is Gillard about to be exposed (Read 72240 times)
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #270 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:06am
 
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:00am:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 7:58am:
Over an hour of intense questioning where the media had every opportunity to expose any wrong doing and ask the questions Tony Abbott claims the media where entitled to ask.....Now cretins from the right are making claims she still has questions to answer.....Anyone who still reads the Australian opinion spread sheet must now accept it is a crap publication that has no ethics at all.....News Ltd should lose its licence for deliberately lying to the public IMO!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

And not the PM. lol right.


you need a licence to be PM?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #271 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:08am
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:06am:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:00am:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 7:58am:
Over an hour of intense questioning where the media had every opportunity to expose any wrong doing and ask the questions Tony Abbott claims the media where entitled to ask.....Now cretins from the right are making claims she still has questions to answer.....Anyone who still reads the Australian opinion spread sheet must now accept it is a crap publication that has no ethics at all.....News Ltd should lose its licence for deliberately lying to the public IMO!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

And not the PM. lol right.


you need a licence to be PM?

The PM to lose her position. I forgot, god knows why, that I need to leave little room for the slow.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #272 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:41am
 
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:08am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:06am:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:00am:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 7:58am:
Over an hour of intense questioning where the media had every opportunity to expose any wrong doing and ask the questions Tony Abbott claims the media where entitled to ask.....Now cretins from the right are making claims she still has questions to answer.....Anyone who still reads the Australian opinion spread sheet must now accept it is a crap publication that has no ethics at all.....News Ltd should lose its licence for deliberately lying to the public IMO!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

And not the PM. lol right.


you need a licence to be PM?

The PM to lose her position. I forgot, god knows why, that I need to leave little room for the slow.


I'm just quoting you ... if you think it sounds dumb then you are starting to get a little impression of how others feel after reading what you write ....
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #273 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:55am
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:41am:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:08am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:06am:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:00am:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 7:58am:
Over an hour of intense questioning where the media had every opportunity to expose any wrong doing and ask the questions Tony Abbott claims the media where entitled to ask.....Now cretins from the right are making claims she still has questions to answer.....Anyone who still reads the Australian opinion spread sheet must now accept it is a crap publication that has no ethics at all.....News Ltd should lose its licence for deliberately lying to the public IMO!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

And not the PM. lol right.


you need a licence to be PM?

The PM to lose her position. I forgot, god knows why, that I need to leave little room for the slow.


I'm just quoting you ... if you think it sounds dumb then you are starting to get a little impression of how others feel after reading what you write ....

your comprehension levels are poor at best.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #274 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:57am
 
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:55am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:41am:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:08am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:06am:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:00am:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 7:58am:
Over an hour of intense questioning where the media had every opportunity to expose any wrong doing and ask the questions Tony Abbott claims the media where entitled to ask.....Now cretins from the right are making claims she still has questions to answer.....Anyone who still reads the Australian opinion spread sheet must now accept it is a crap publication that has no ethics at all.....News Ltd should lose its licence for deliberately lying to the public IMO!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

And not the PM. lol right.


you need a licence to be PM?

The PM to lose her position. I forgot, god knows why, that I need to leave little room for the slow.


I'm just quoting you ... if you think it sounds dumb then you are starting to get a little impression of how others feel after reading what you write ....

your comprehension level are poor at best.


your ability to express yourself in a manor of someone in full use of their facilities is poor at best ...
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Lynn
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 80
Glen Iris
Gender: female
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #275 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 9:13am
 
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 7:58am:
Over an hour of intense questioning where the media had every opportunity to expose any wrong doing and ask the questions Tony Abbott claims the media where entitled to ask.....Now cretins from the right are making claims she still has questions to answer.....Anyone who still reads the Australian opinion spread sheet must now accept it is a crap publication that has no ethics at all.....News Ltd should lose its licence for deliberately lying to the public IMO!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Hello Phil,

News Ltd has not lied to the public, as you put it.

They posted an apology due to a small error. Instead of referring to a "slush fund", which Ms Gillard
said in her own words, they called it a "trust fund". That is all.

Lynn
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lisa.greek
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1595
Cairns QLD
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #276 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 9:57am
 
Lynn wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 9:13am:
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 7:58am:
Over an hour of intense questioning where the media had every opportunity to expose any wrong doing and ask the questions Tony Abbott claims the media where entitled to ask.....Now cretins from the right are making claims she still has questions to answer.....Anyone who still reads the Australian opinion spread sheet must now accept it is a crap publication that has no ethics at all.....News Ltd should lose its licence for deliberately lying to the public IMO!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Hello Phil,

News Ltd has not lied to the public, as you put it.

They posted an apology due to a small error. Instead of referring to a "slush fund", which Ms Gillard
said in her own words, they called it a "trust fund". That is all.

Lynn



Well Lynn it was either a lie or incompetent reporting based on terrible journalist effort.

To have to state:

"An article in today's The Australian reported that Prime Minister Julia Gillard had set up a trust fund for her then boyfriend 17 years ago," the paper's apology says.

"This is wrong. The Australian apologises for the error."

is very embarrassing.   

I note that Andrew Bolt has also had a tanty and has stated he will not comment on the issue any more?  Why do you think he has taken that stance?  Perhaps because he will get the clacker sued out of him.  Gillard stated she would not persue Pickering because he is bankrupt anyway - but Bolty must have the cash to pay.

But - he is off running away as well
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lynn
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 80
Glen Iris
Gender: female
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #277 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:16am
 
Mr Bolt has a number of stories on this AWU matter on his blog today.

Lynn
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #278 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:00pm
 
Lynn wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:16am:
Mr Bolt has a number of stories on this AWU matter on his blog today.

Lynn


Hello Lynn,

It may have escaped your notice but the AWU is not the Prime Minister. That office currently rests with Julia Gillard. It may also have escaped your notice that Bolt is a dickhead.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #279 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:06pm
 
Gist wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:00pm:
Lynn wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:16am:
Mr Bolt has a number of stories on this AWU matter on his blog today.

Lynn


Hello Lynn,

It may have escaped your notice but the AWU is not the Prime Minister. That office currently rests with Julia Gillard. It may also have escaped your notice that Bolt is a dickhead.


Your playing very nicely with our new bigot nanna Gist, I haven't been able to reply without profanities so have not attempted it.

Do you think it's Karnal?

I do, his been a bit lonely since Matty left Wink
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #280 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 2:58pm
 
WHAT A CUNNING STUNT?


Well done, Julia. No, seriously, I mean that. Shot me down in flames you did. I really felt like crawling under a rock after that impromptu performance.

That was so brilliantly cunning to pounce on a typo in “The Australian” in order to pull on a Press conference claiming defamation of all things. What was the typo, “trust” instead of “slush”, was it?

It was really good the way you gave absolutely no notice to the Press who were so obviously caught on the hop. No time for Editors to tell correspondents what they wanted asked! Wow, only two questions of any substance and you dodged them so beautifully.

I was impressed the way you praised the Press as being the cream of the country’s journalists. Golly, only two tired old Lefties, Grattan and Bongiorno plus a few snotty nosed cadets were present.

Not one of the Press actually knew what to ask. They don’t know the background to this. Brilliant Jules!

So, as a tired ol’ newspaperman, could I humbly ask you to answer, just specially for me, the following, (I promise I won't tell anyone):

1. You said yesterday that you paid for your renovations. Why then did you previously say you couldn’t be certain that you did?

2. You said you believed it was “slush fund”. As an industrial Lawyer did you seriously not know a “slush fund” could in no way be an Association?

3. If you believed it was a “slush fund” why did you print on the Application Form that its intended role was to facilitate “worker safety and training”?

4. Is it true that the four people present in the room when you drew up this document were yourself, Ralph Blewitt, Bruce Wilson and Senior Equity Partner, Bernard Murphy?

5. An Association requires, by law, to have at least five members. Who did you nominate?

6. When you drew up a power of attorney for your friend Bruce Wilson to act for Ralph Blewitt, why did you not inform Mr Blewitt of the mortgage, now in his name, subsequent to going to buy the house with Mr Wilson?

7. When conducting the firm’s conveyancing (again pro bono) for the purchase and sale of the Kerr Street house, did you take note of where the money was coming from and going to?

8. Why were the Association, the bank account, the purchase and sale of the house and the mortgage kept secret from the AWU.

9. How could the purchase of a house be consistent with either a “slush fund” or “worker safety and training”?

10. Why did you attempt to deliberately mislead the WA Commissioner for Corporate Affairs when setting up this Association?

11. Why did you not inform your firm’s boss or your firm’s client, the AWU, of any of your actions?

12. Do you agree it is your handwriting on the fraudulent form?

13. When the AWU discovered the fraud, why did that union’s boss, Ian Cambridge, immediately sack Slater & Gordon and call for a Royal Commission?

14. Why were you asked, by your employer, for a taped interview?

15. After you were dismissed why did you not renew your Practising Certificate? Did you beieve you would be unable to practise again?

16. Why is the six months subsequent to your dismissal missing from your CV?

17. Why did your boss, Styant-Browne say, and I quote: "...the company took a very serious view of these and other matters and accepted her resignation"?

18. What did Mr Styant-Browne mean by, “...a serious view of these and other matters?

19. Is Mr Styant-Browne, or Mr Gordon correct?

20. Why was Senior Equity Partner Bernard Murphy asked to make a settlement and leave at the same time as yourself?

21. When your ex-Attorney General Rob McClelland stated in Parliament, “...a third party may have benefitted from...”, was this “third party” he referred to, you?

22. What did you mean by, “I was treated shabbily”, when you were asked to leave the firm?

23. You refuse to make a statement in the House. Is it true you realise it would be illegal to lie when so doing?

24. And finally Ms Gillard, how can you profess to be a champion of the working class when you have clearly been complicit, with your boyfriend, in stealing their money?

Now, I don’t expect you to answer all of these, just a few would be good... with the rest you can perform your normal stunt of evasion.

[P.S. And yes, I will be bankrupt for the next month or so. Lost my fast car, my helicopter and my kid to my ex. Then she bankrupted me, just for fun. Oh well, I’m running out of brood mares now.]


http://lpickering.net/item/2687
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #281 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 3:50pm
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:06pm:
Gist wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:00pm:
Lynn wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:16am:
Mr Bolt has a number of stories on this AWU matter on his blog today.

Lynn


Hello Lynn,

It may have escaped your notice but the AWU is not the Prime Minister. That office currently rests with Julia Gillard. It may also have escaped your notice that Bolt is a dickhead.


Your playing very nicely with our new bigot nanna Gist, I haven't been able to reply without profanities so have not attempted it.

Do you think it's Karnal?

I do, his been a bit lonely since Matty left Wink


I haven't been on here much today at all so I haven't had a chance to see much of Lynn's donations. But yes, they do seem to have that funky foot odour about them. From the little I've seen I wondered if Lynn is or has ever been married to matty.

Have you Lynn?

Poor Karnal has been looking for someone to stand behind since matty's departure.
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
lisa.greek
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1595
Cairns QLD
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #282 - Aug 24th, 2012 at 3:53pm
 
hmmmmm   smell the desperation!!!!!Pickering is gunna have to draw a lot more cartoons of men's willies soon.    If he ever gets out of bankrupt status.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #283 - Aug 25th, 2012 at 4:31pm
 
How many weeks does Gillard have?

Did Gillard see this cheque?


...

This cheque, drawn on accounts attached to the Australian Workers Union Workplace Reform Association which Julia Gillard helped to register, was sent to Slater & Gordon for the purchase of a private house for Ralph Blewett, bag man for Gillard’s then boyfriend, Bruce Wilson.

Gillard was at the auction and knew the house was for Blewett and that her boyfriend would live in it.

She later told partners of her law firm she’d known the association was actually a ”slush fund”, ostensibly for her boyfriend’s re-election. In that interview she talked of such slush funds being needed to fight elections that “can cost $10,000, $20,000” .

So if Gillard had seen this cheque arrive at Slater & Gordon, and had noted it was from accounts attached to the slush fund she’d helped to set up, she might well have wondered about the huge amount and about it being used to pay for a house, not an election. If she had seen it. I make no allegation.

If anyone else at Slater & Gordon had seen it, you might think they’d have wondered why a cheque from the AWU or an association seemingly connected to it was being used to pay for a private house.

Some background from a news report soon after the scandal broke:

Between 1992 and 1995, about $370,000 flowed through two Perth-based accounts - operated in the name of the “AWU Workplace Reform Association Inc” - which, until last month, had never been heard of in the AWU’s national offices in Sydney.


All the money came from the big construction group Thiess Contractors, which says the payments were legitimate, arising from a tripartite agreement between it, the AWU and the West Australian Government.


Exactly where all the money ended up is far from clear....

Several other cheques totalling about $35,000 were made out in 1993 to a now ex-AWU official, Mr Ralph Blewitt, and, once, about $67,000 went to the trust account of the high-profile Melbourne law firm Slater and Gordon… It coincides with the purchase of a house in the Melbourne suburb of Fitzroy in Mr Blewitt’s name.

A cheque made out to the “Slater and Gordon Trust Account” was dated five days before the firm arranged settlement on the $230,000 property.

Other records show Mr Wilson later lived in the Fitzroy house ...

This transaction astonished then AWU national secretary Ian Cambridge, now a Fair Work Australia commissioner. Here is a passage from his affidavit - a document Cambridge this week said he stood by:

...
...

I know Gillard says she will not be answering any more questions. But these are some I believe do need answers:


- Did Gillard see this cheque, and, if so, when?

- Did she note the source of the funds?

- What steps did she then take to alert the AWU, police, Slater & Gordon or regulatory authorities?

- If none, why not?

- If Gillard did not see this cheque, who in Slater & Gordon did?

- Did they note the source of the funds?

- What steps did they then take to alert the AWU, police or regulatory authorities?



UPDATE

Phillip Coorey in the Fairfax press may be wrong, of course, but...:


The Fitzroy house was bought in Mr Blewitt’s name, even though he did not have the assets to finance the purchase, and it was Mr Wilson who lived in it. Ms Gillard did the conveyancing work.


http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/did_g...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39818
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #284 - Aug 25th, 2012 at 6:25pm
 
Quote:
- Did Gillard see this cheque, and, if so, when?


Why would she?  Was her role at Slater & Gordon the Office girl who receipted incoming cheques?

Quote:
- Did she note the source of the funds?


In light of the above, irrelevant.

Quote:
- What steps did she then take to alert the AWU, police, Slater & Gordon or regulatory authorities?

- If none, why not?


In light of the above, irrelevant.

Quote:
- If Gillard did not see this cheque, who in Slater & Gordon did?


Most likely the office girl who receipts incoming cheques.

Quote:
- Did they note the source of the funds?

- What steps did they then take to alert the AWU, police or regulatory authorities?


Why would they.  The office girl who does that could not give a fig and is not expected to.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 24
Send Topic Print