Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 24
Send Topic Print
Is Gillard about to be exposed (Read 72098 times)
woof woof
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1518
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #225 - Aug 20th, 2012 at 1:11pm
 
Government MPs have dismissed it as muckracking?? so they know the exact circumstances around the event??


I ask a simple question.
Is it appropriate for someone in a defactop relationship to have financial dealing outside of the home? is it appropriate for Gillard to establish accounts for her boyfriend??

I know when I was working in a bank that I wasn't allowed to do any bank related work for my family or relatives.

Why are ppl here defending Gillard in her actions of establishing accounts (dodgy ones too) for her live in boyfriend, Is that an ethical thing to do?

Even if these accounts were legitimate and authentic, would it be appropriate for Gillard to do the paperwork for them given her relationship with Wilson??

I'd say no its not appropriate and another lawyer of S&G should have done the paper work??

She's hiding something that much is obvious.

BTW shes dam uglier when she's angry.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #226 - Aug 20th, 2012 at 2:24pm
 
Abbott says govt smear coming from within


AAP

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says Labor MPs – not coalition members – are behind the resurgence of claims against the prime minister dating back to her time as an industrial lawyer.

A former Slater & Gordon partner, Nick Styant-Browne, has alleged Julia Gillard resigned from the firm after an internal review of her work for allegedly corrupt former Australian Workers Union official Bruce Wilson.

Mr Wilson was her partner at the time as well as a legal client.

While the prime minister has denied any wrongdoing, she has declined to give a point-by-point explanation of the events.

Slater & Gordon managing partner Andrew Grech said in a statement that Ms Gillard had "co-operated fully with the internal review and denied any wrongdoing".

He said the review had "found nothing which contradicted the information provided by Ms Gillard at the time".

Ms Gillard resigned from the firm in May 1996 when she took up a job with the Victorian Labor opposition as an adviser.

Mr Abbott told reporters in Canberra, as parliament began four days of sittings, that Labor MP and former cabinet minister Robert McClelland had raised the matter in parliament.

"It's obviously ... a legitimate subject of media interest," he said.

However, he did not repeat his call for the prime minister to make a statement explaining herself to parliament.

With a Newspoll due to be released on Tuesday, and a Nielsen poll coming next week, government MPs accused the opposition of muckraking.

"This is completely a non-story and it's a demonstration of the desperation of this opposition that they want to muckrake, that they want to kick this story along," parliamentary secretary Mark Dreyfus told reporters.

Liberal senator Mitch Fifield said the coalition had nothing to do with any smear campaign.

"Every question, every bit of information on this matter, is coming from the Labor movement," he told Sky News.

http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Labor-behind-Gillard-smear-Ab...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #227 - Aug 20th, 2012 at 4:12pm
 
Abbott says govt smear coming from within






exactly every thing is coming from the union officials that were there at the time...Blewitt being the only one as I know thats asked for immunity.so he at least is saying he was involved...

Of course she should not have been opening and organising accounts for her AWU boyfriend..

these could not have been BanK ACCOUNTS AS SHE WASNT WORKING IN A BANK..

it was after an internal investigation by Slater and Gordon regarding her actions and even receiving home alterations from AWU monies.. that her resignation was accepted... maybe asked for.. she was a partner after all.


if she didnt keep dodging bullets then we could all move on as it is she keeps trying to change the subject or string out the time allotted to the interview.

why doesnt someone ask her why havent you sued Pickering????
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
woof woof
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1518
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #228 - Aug 20th, 2012 at 5:43pm
 
They were bank accounts she opened, thats were the money was channelled into.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #229 - Aug 20th, 2012 at 6:05pm
 
woof woof wrote on Aug 20th, 2012 at 5:43pm:
They were bank accounts she opened, thats were the money was channelled into.





but what would they have to do with the law firm????? thats what I mean.. I know she could go into a bank and open an account for the AWU

but it says she was doing legal work????.

again we havent heard what legal work.. but at the end of the day she shouldnt have been doing anything for the union..

anything would be conflict of interest surely?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #230 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 7:06pm
 
Gillard/AWU Time-bomb - Latest from Michael Smith




Michael Smith - a commentator courageous enough to put his job on the line - says that the authorities were deceived about the purpose of the sham not-for-profit entity, the "AWU Workplace Reform Association", which Julia Gillard set up for her boyfriend Bruce Wilson as well as Ralph Blewitt - the relevant document can be seen in this video.

Following on CANdo's recent explosive video interviews, Michael Smith refers to revelations in The Australian by a former law firm partner, including one that Ms. Gillard knew the fund was to ensure the re-election of union bosses - a "slush fund".

There are "hard questions" which Michael Smith says the Prime Minister must now answer.

But contrary to the Prime Minister's repeated claims, not one of the answers is on the public record.

These include the potential conflict of interest in acting for the two men and the AWU, that the AWU was unaware of the formation of the sham entity, that it was used for illicit purposes which included the purchase and renovation of a house on which Julia Gillard's firm acted without charge and provided a mortgage, and that the balance of the purchase price for the house was provided, not by a bank cheque as requested, but by a cheque from the sham entity in clear breach of its rules.

Distancing himself from rumour and innuendo by some internet bloggers, he stressed that everything he was saying was supported by clear evidence, and had been vetted by expert lawyers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #231 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 7:21pm
 
From the video above

Allegation/charge

In deceiving the corporate affairs commissioner in WA such that he would incorporate improperly, an association that didn't warrant incorporation. That is a very serious charge.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #232 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 7:28pm
 
so how do you set up a slushfund???? if these are all in legal documents then they must still exist.along with the bank accounts..I expect even bank accounts I had years ago are still on record somewhereI find it really hard to believe this could not all be tracked down.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Shane B
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1473
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #233 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 7:28pm
 
Why are there differences in the reasons given for Gillard leaving Slater and Gordon???

More unanswered questions in this shameful tale. The Prime Minister is clearly not beyond reproach.
Back to top
 

Julia Gillard - twice selected, never elected.

We're still paying for the Whitlam Government.
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #234 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 7:45pm
 
Well well, looky what we have here.

Mr Styant-Browne who first stated that Gillard was pushed due to her not being able to say if she benifited from the stolen money and due to her conduct in her work she had done for Wilson.

Now he gets this request.

He was told yesterday morning to return any documents in his possession about the matters involving Ms Gillard, Mr Wilson, and any legal files relevant to Ms Gillard's work for other union officials and the AWU.

The legal letter he received from Leon Zwier of Melbourne firm Arnold Bloch Leibler asked him to "treat this letter as a confidential communication between us ... Slater & Gordon is aware of recent media about the AWU/Bruce Wilson matter which attributes statements to you.

"I am instructed that you are in possession of confidential documents that are and always have been the property of Slater & Gordon.

"Please send them to me electronically. If they are hard copy documents only, please send them to my business address and do not retain a copy of them.

"For example I am also instructed that you have retained a number of Slater & Gordon documents concerning its legal review of the AWU/Bruce Wilson matter in general, and a purported transcript of an interview with Julia Gillard in particular.

"Slater & Gordon has not authorised you to discuss its contents with any party. Slater & Gordon is concerned that you may inadvertently have used its documents and confidential information in talking to the media. Would you please ensure that you do not do so.

"Slater & Gordon is also concerned that you may inadvertently have discussed with others the confidential (and personal and private) information of former employees.


Slater & Gordon partners turn on each other amid gag threat



SLATER & Gordon, whose internal 1995 probe resulted in Julia Gillard leaving her job at the law firm, is now trying to gag a former equity partner after he disclosed secrets concealed for the past 17 years.

After speaking out in The Weekend Australian about the circumstances of Ms Gillard's departure, Nick Styant-Browne received a legal letter yesterday from lawyers for Slater & Gordon and its former partner, Peter Gordon.

The letter to Mr Styant-Browne states: "These issues are serious and my clients and I genuinely hope that they can be resolved amicably, discreetly and quickly."

The Prime Minister has strenuously denied wrongdoing or knowledge of an alleged major union fraud involving her then boyfriend and client Bruce Wilson. Ms Gillard has repeatedly declined to answer specific questions about the legal work she did for him.

Ms Gillard left the firm as a partner in late 1995 as a result of the partnership's "very serious view" of her conduct involving Mr Wilson, who was a leader of the Australian Workers Union.

After the weekend revelations, Slater & Gordon, a long-time Labor-supporting firm listed on the Australian Securities Exchange, lent Ms Gillard support on Sunday with a statement that said she left to pursue a Senate role. Mr Styant-Browne, who lives in Seattle, yesterday accused his former employer of omitting facts with its Sunday statement about Ms Gillard's conduct and her departure.

He was told yesterday morning to return any documents in his possession about the matters involving Ms Gillard, Mr Wilson, and any legal files relevant to Ms Gillard's work for other union officials and the AWU.

The legal letter he received from Leon Zwier of Melbourne firm Arnold Bloch Leibler asked him to "treat this letter as a confidential communication between us ... Slater & Gordon is aware of recent media about the AWU/Bruce Wilson matter which attributes statements to you.

"I am instructed that you are in possession of confidential documents that are and always have been the property of Slater & Gordon.

"Please send them to me electronically. If they are hard copy documents only, please send them to my business address and do not retain a copy of them.

"For example I am also instructed that you have retained a number of Slater & Gordon documents concerning its legal review of the AWU/Bruce Wilson matter in general, and a purported transcript of an interview with Julia Gillard in particular.

"Slater & Gordon has not authorised you to discuss its contents with any party. Slater & Gordon is concerned that you may inadvertently have used its documents and confidential information in talking to the media. Would you please ensure that you do not do so.

"Slater & Gordon is also concerned that you may inadvertently have discussed with others the confidential (and personal and private) information of former employees.

"Would you please ensure that you do not do so."

Mr Styant-Browne told The Australian late yesterday: "When I made public certain of the matters surrounding Julia Gillard's departure from Slater & Gordon, I was meticulous to ensure a balanced account of the facts was given. I did not ever contemplate that the world's only publicly listed law firm, Slater & Gordon, would spin the facts of her departure to the market in the way that it did yesterday so as to protect the Prime Minister's position."

Slater & Gordon's statement on Sunday by managing director Andrew Grech said it was based on "records it now holds" and said that Ms Gillard "took a leave of absence in order to campaign for the senate" in September 1995.

"Ms Gillard's resignation from the firm became effective on 3 May, 1996, when, Slater & Gordon understands, she commenced employment with the then Victorian opposition leader as an adviser," Mr Grech said.

A spokesman for Ms Gillard told The Australian in reply to a list of questions on Friday: "The Prime Minister maintains good relations with Slater & Gordon. The Prime Minister has made clear that she was not involved in any wrongdoing, and has dealt with these allegations previously."

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/slater-gordon-partners-turn-on-...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #235 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 7:55pm
 
Is the Prime Minister a crook? Part VII


It appears that Nicola Roxon and Peter Van Sumbugger are the only two people left standing who are young and naive enough to believe this is a Liberal Party beat-up.

Sorry Nicola and Peter, we have never spoken to any Opposition Member and it's far from a beat-up. The continuous stream of information is coming from your side of the House and one other person the Prime Minister knew very well. There are some angry people on your Benches.

Well, you two, here's more to cause you some indigestion.

Slater & Gordon handle unfair dismissal claims in their thousands. Gillard herself handled a few, so she knew exactly what it meant when she was called in for a taped interview... it was a precursor to her dismissal.

It's a moot point as to whether she was given the opportunity to resign or not. All legal employees, short of an accusation of murder, are extended that courtesy because a "dismissal" could both injure the firm's reputation and terminally end the employee's career. Regardless, it appears to have done both anyway.

The fraudulent document that allowed the "slush fund" to be set up was first presented in Perth. It was taken to the Commissioner of Corporate Affairs who promptly refused to allow it on grounds that it appeared to be too much like a union.

Undeterred, Wilson asked Gillard to do it. Incredibly, Gillard agreed. It was pointless to persist in Perth because the Commissioner had already knocked it back so it was off to Victoria and the offices of Slater & Gordon.

Now, even the most young and naive person on the planet would have known this was highly unethical at best and illegal on a number of fronts at worst.

There were three other people present when this document was drawn up: Ralph Blewitt, Bruce Wilson and senior equity partner, Bernard Murphy. (Bernard Murphy was the anonymous name "The Australian" redacted in its Page one story.)

In the record of interview Gillard stated that she "acted alone". She lied. Was she protecting Bernard Murphy? If so, it didn't help. Murphy hurriedly departed the firm on an agreed settlement prior to Gillard.

[Gillard was later to appoint Bernard Murphy to the Federal Court bench. Why did she do that? Was she worried he would disclose critical information relating to the blatant fraud?]

When the document was completed by Gillard it was signed by Blewitt. Wilson then took it to the Commonwealth Bank to open the now infamous account: The AWU Workplace Reform Association Inc.

It appeared on the record as an AWU account, it wasn't, but it was ready to launder hundreds of thousands of dollars, attracting no tax, into Wilson's pocket. More importantly the AWU had no knowledge of it. Yet the AWU was a client of Gillard's in the form of Wilson. The law firm itself acted for the Vic AWU.

In a classic conflict of interest, Gillard was actually facilitating theft by her boyfriend from her own firm's client, the AWU! Gillard was also improperly acting for her criminal boyfriend who was also a representative of the AWU client!

Slater & Gordon is obliged to keep the Law Institute of Victoria updated as to who is operating on their Practising Certificate? The Law Institute claims privilege on this information. We have reason to believe Julia was removed from the Certificate in September and not in May the following year as they now advise?

When the fraudulent activity was eventually discovered Peter Gordon hit the roof, but his position was untenable because:

Slater & Gordon is hardly independent. Incredibly, if they sacked her, they would be exposed to a reimbursement claim from their own client (the AWU) for all monies stolen, plus costs. What a predicament Gillard had created. No wonder they were angry.

Because Gillard did not open a file on the case, to appraise others in the firm of her actions, her conduct may be subject to criminal charges and the Professional Indemnity policy would not have been exposed (you cannot insure against criminal activity).

Lawyers are now pitting their credibility against each other. In this fiery battle of recollections and taped records Nick Styant-Browne will emerge the winner.

That may sound a bit complicated. It is! And the more Slater & Gordon wriggles the more it will need the services of a good Left wing law firm.

Part VIII: Enter the Unions and Bill Shorten.

http://pickeringpost.com/article/is-the-prime-minister-a-crook-part-vii/386
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
woof woof
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1518
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #236 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 8:06pm
 
i see his account has been shut down again, must really be hitting the nails on the head.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #237 - Aug 21st, 2012 at 8:08pm
 
woof woof wrote on Aug 21st, 2012 at 8:06pm:
i see his account has been shut down again, must really be hitting the nails on the head.

Labor is working hard.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26588
Australia
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #238 - Aug 22nd, 2012 at 6:37am
 
woof woof wrote on Aug 20th, 2012 at 1:11pm:
Government MPs have dismissed it as muckracking?? so they know the exact circumstances around the event??


Maybe they do. They don't have to tell us you know. Now if julian assange were on the problem . . . .. .

Quote:
Is it appropriate for someone in a defactop relationship to have financial dealing outside of the home? is it appropriate for Gillard to establish accounts for her boyfriend??


uhh yeah of course it is. Why wouldn't it be? Especially since shes a lawyer.

Quote:
I know when I was working in a bank that I wasn't allowed to do any bank related work for my family or relatives.


Because you lived @ the bank and it was part of your personal life?

My dad used to do my tax returns for me when i was younger. You see something wrong with that? (he was a lawyer). he also filed a workers comp thing for me when i was 17 and got me $700 for a broken leg.

Quote:
She's hiding something that much is obvious.


If its personal then of course shes hiding it from the public. Wouldn't you? Tell us all your business. Show us all your legal documents.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Shane B
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1473
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #239 - Aug 22nd, 2012 at 10:59am
 
Gee this fiasco just won't go away for Gillard. The Australian is running at least 6 stories on this today.

They've found Wilson as well. He's not talking for now, but apparently the TV networks have their chequebooks out.
Back to top
 

Julia Gillard - twice selected, never elected.

We're still paying for the Whitlam Government.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 24
Send Topic Print