Australian Politics Forum - Global Warming's terrifying new maths

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths Reply #120 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 5:33am For those of you who are interested, here is NASA's Tom Wagner putting the melt into perspective. In isolation a one off melt might not tell us much, but how about we step back a bit and look at the bigger picture.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #121 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 7:36am

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 5:33am:

For those of you who are interested, here is NASA's Tom Wagner putting the melt into perspective. In isolation a one off melt might not tell us much, but how about we step back a bit and look at the bigger picture.

Can we have those NASA scientists back, asking NASA to keep to the science like they used to and to stop becoming a joke, just like the political and pathetic IPCC.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths Reply #122 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:32am The only people claiming NASA scientists are a joke are people who believe climate science is some sort of witchcraft and those paid to make people like you think climate science is some sort of witchcraft.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #123 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:37am

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:32am:

The only people claiming NASA scientists are a joke are people who believe climate science is some sort of witchcraft and those paid to make people like you think climate science is some sort of witchcraft.

You think NASA astronauts and scientists think that. Bit rich of a claim.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #124 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:58am

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:37am:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:32am:

The only people claiming NASA scientists are a joke are people who believe climate science is some sort of witchcraft and those paid to make people like you think climate science is some sort of witchcraft.

You think NASA astronauts and scientists think that. Bit rich of a claim.

Are you talking about Harrison Schmitt, ex-astronaut and now board member at the Oil and Tobacco shilling Heartland Institute. I'll think you'll find he belongs to the second group.

Now play fair, progs, otherwise I'll be forced to bring out the denominator.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #125 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:38am

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:58am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:37am:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:32am:

The only people claiming NASA scientists are a joke are people who believe climate science is some sort of witchcraft and those paid to make people like you think climate science is some sort of witchcraft.

You think NASA astronauts and scientists think that. Bit rich of a claim.

Are you talking about Harrison Schmitt, ex-astronaut and now board member at the Oil and Tobacco shilling Heartland Institute. I'll think you'll find he belongs to the second group.

Now play fair, progs, otherwise I'll be forced to bring out the denominator.

Those propaganda videos you keep showing dont do much for your cred either.

Back to top

IP Logged

tonegunman1

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 427

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #126 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:44am

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:58am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:37am:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:32am:

The only people claiming NASA scientists are a joke are people who believe climate science is some sort of witchcraft and those paid to make people like you think climate science is some sort of witchcraft.

You think NASA astronauts and scientists think that. Bit rich of a claim.

Are you talking about Harrison Schmitt, ex-astronaut and now board member at the Oil and Tobacco shilling Heartland Institute. I'll think you'll find he belongs to the second group.

Now play fair, progs, otherwise I'll be forced to bring out the denominator.

Cherry picking????
Pot...kettle...

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #127 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:52am

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:38am:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:58am:

progressiveslol wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:37am:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 8:32am:

The only people claiming NASA scientists are a joke are people who believe climate science is some sort of witchcraft and those paid to make people like you think climate science is some sort of witchcraft.

You think NASA astronauts and scientists think that. Bit rich of a claim.

Are you talking about Harrison Schmitt, ex-astronaut and now board member at the Oil and Tobacco shilling Heartland Institute. I'll think you'll find he belongs to the second group.

Now play fair, progs, otherwise I'll be forced to bring out the denominator.

Those propaganda videos you keep showing dont do much for your cred either.

What is the difference between a video and an article. If there was information in the video that I believed was inaccurate I wouldn't post it. What bits of the video do you disagree with?

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

MOTR Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6646	Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths Reply #128 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:56am Tonegunman1, how about you provide some context to the graph you've just posted.
Back to top	Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings "What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions." IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #129 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 11:33am

Good to see the good side of NASA are still on the case.

Will They Come?

Concerned with statements made by current NASA officials that the science of climate change is settled and that it is now certain that man-made CO2 will result in catastrophic global warming, a group of former NASA scientists have formed a group to review the basis of such statements. Calling themselves the “Right Climate Stuff” team, they have begun inviting experts from both sides of the almost non-existent public debate concerning the human impact on global climate change to present their data and conclusions. But will they come?

The Right Climate Stuff (RCS) team’s objective is to review the data and computer models being used by the often alarmist proponents of man-made climate change as well as historical reconstructions relied upon by scientists questioning whether the human impact on climate is significant or insignificant compared with natural climate drivers. To date, a number of invitations have been sent and some preliminary reviews have been held.

As an unpaid volunteer group with no political agendas or current ties to the fossil fuel industry, the RCS team offers an excellent opportunity for the various groups or individuals to defend their positions and data on the impact of man-made CO2 on the climate. For scientists who have declared the science is settled now face flagging public support and trust, this will provide an opportunity to drive that point home before an objective interdisciplinary team of reputable scientists. For skeptical scientists, this evaluation process will offer a rare public opportunity to make their case in an objective forum.

http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/11296/Will-They-Come

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #130 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 11:53am

Collectively, how many hours have these former NASA employees spent researching our climate. What makes them more special than the thousands of employees currently working for NASA.

If they have something substantive how about they stump up a few arguments. Schmitt had a go but it didn't take long to work out he didn't really have a clue.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

tonegunman1 Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 427	Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths Reply #131 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 1:18pm MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:56am: Tonegunman1, how about you provide some context to the graph you've just posted. I forgot you have trouble reading/understanding/comprehending/evaluating/discerning/.... Ignorant twat.
Back to top	IP Logged

Upton Sinclair

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 496

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #132 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 2:09pm

tonegunman1 wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 1:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:56am:

Tonegunman1, how about you provide some context to the graph you've just posted.

I forgot you have trouble reading/understanding/comprehending/evaluating/discerning/....
Ignorant twat.

What I discern from the graph is that there is a clear and undeniable correlation between CO2 and global temperature.

What do you discern from it?

Back to top

"I am not asking the Australian people to take me on trust, but on the record of a lifetime,"
--Tony Abbott

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #133 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 2:39pm

tonegunman1 wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 1:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:56am:

Tonegunman1, how about you provide some context to the graph you've just posted.

I forgot you have trouble reading/understanding/comprehending/evaluating/discerning/....
Ignorant twat.

No need to be rude. I'm quite certain I can do all those things, how about you have a go a putting your argument into words.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

tonegunman1

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 427

Re: Global Warming's terrifying new maths
Reply #134 - Jul 28^th, 2012 at 5:18pm

Upton Sinclair wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 2:09pm:

tonegunman1 wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 1:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Jul 28^th, 2012 at 9:56am:

Tonegunman1, how about you provide some context to the graph you've just posted.

I forgot you have trouble reading/understanding/comprehending/evaluating/discerning/....
Ignorant twat.

What I discern from the graph is that there is a clear and undeniable correlation between CO2 and global temperature.

What do you discern from it?

Really...then you can tell which of the two come first.

Back to top

IP Logged