it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 7
th, 2015 at 8:41pm:
No, I feel as if I'm treading water, getting nowhere
'They' (and I don't mean government) appear to hold all the cards
Around the world, people try to solve the enigma of Bigfoot, Yowies, archaeological anomalies, megaliths, ghosts, the fae, precognition, deja vu, ESP, telepathy, UFOs, aliens, the Hag phenomenon, possession, dowsing, etc. And every day, new witnesses - experiences - theories
I know what
I think ever since it was shown to me, i.e., 'superimposed realities / dimensions / universes. I've accepted this as true for at least the past 30 to 40 years
I'm fortunate to have lived to see science theorise similarly. But putting the pieces together to the point we can understand and use it to progress mankind spiritually and practically ...
Did we lose 'it', or have we not yet developed it ?
Are we evolving or devolving ?
Are we farmed ?
Or are we (as I've suggested in previous posts) merely echoes, ghosts, of realities elsewhere ?
It's all fascinating. But is our fascination a deliberate distraction imposed upon us ?
Precognition is a big one for me. As with thousands of others, I've experienced it a number of times and the events foretold were related to others prior to the event taking place in our reality, thus witnessed and validated as accurate
Precognition can only mean one or two things (1) some of us 'see' the future before it unfolds or (2) what we're seeing is the past, which in turn means we're echoes of the past but believe ourselves to be living in the 'present' and able on occasion to see the future
Which is likeliest ? If we opt for (1) it can ONLY mean that everything which occurs (not only to us but to the physical world and everything upon it) is subject to predetermination. It means we do not 'make decisions' at all. It means we are not masters of our destinies. It means we're puppets, or something akin to bits and bytes in a computer game. Is that why humans have such highly developed egos ?
If we opt for (2) it's the same thing in reverse
So whichever way we look at it, we're no more substantial or autonomous than illustrations in a child's picture-book
People are
highly averse to such a suggestion. Their reactions range from open hostility to accusations that I'm mad. They say, ' I don't know what the hell you're talking about ! '. Others pinch their faces and leave the room, saying they don't care, it all sounds stupid and they have better things to do --
'real things' they say as a parting shot
If a genie granted me a wish, I'd ask for everyone on the planet to experience at least one instance of precognition. If all people experienced it for themselves, they'd have to stop and consider what it means for
them. They'd be forced to ask themselves why they invest such energy and time into planning their 'future'. One experience of precognition (especially if all their friends and associates had the same experience) would call into question everything people believe and accept as 'normal'
'
How was I able to see the future ? ' they'd ask themselves -- ask each other -- ask their religious leaders -- ask science -- even ask governments
'
What's the point of our endless agonising over our future ? (marriage partners, whether or not to have children, when to paint the kitchen, how to manage to pay for a new car or their children's education, etc. etc.) people would ask.
'It's not my decision, I can see that now' they'd say in bewilderment and anger. '
None of my decisions or choice mattered. It was all decided in advance anyway. So what's the point ? ' they'd say
Science
knows about precognition. Science conducts experiments on the topic. Science subjects people to endless repeats of the same experiments in laboratories and has done for many decades. Science acknowledges precognition. But as long as only one in a thousand goes public about it, they can be marginalised and discredited and the vast bulk of the population can comfortably scoff when someone claims to have seen what's alleged to be ' the future '. People ascribe occasional mentions of precognition to 'coincidence'. And as the mere idea of our 'future' being subject to the preordination of someone/something else scares people, the vast bulk of the population is more than happy to scoff and claim 'coincidence'
And so we trundle on, subject to religious edicts and assurances, subject to 'science' and its thousands of conflicting claims and theories, subject to governments who earn their living by focusing people's attention on ' the future '
So that's what I'd ask of the genie if it offered me a wish. I'd ask that everyone have at least one precognitive experience. That should cause a rethink worldwide and force people to focus on our true status. I'd love to think it would result in a Big Calm. If I allow myself to become really enthused and optimistic, I like to think it would be a game-changer or a eureka moment for mankind, a quantum-leap, a new reality, growth & massive evolution