what is happening?
http://www.hardwarejournal.co.nz/media/W1siZiIsImhhcmR3YXJlam91cm5hbC8yMDEyLzcvNGhyNXUuanBnIl0sWyJwIiwidGh1bWIiLCIzNjB4PiJdLFsicCIsIm9wdGltIl1d

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 1^st, 2013 at 7:57pm:


If you are correct about this dear one, I’m sure he would know about these things.

However, he says no such thing you’ve quoted him as saying.

Your post is a list of things he doesn’t say. Again - for the millionth time - read your own quoted posts.

Forgiven for libel, fraud and impersonating a psychiatrist.

Guilty or innocent?

The Satanic cult of Freemasonry does not exist in proof. You’ve had 72 pages. All you’ve got is a few paedophile priests and a celebrity witch-hunt involving Rolf Harris.

The trial is over.

http://wwwsp@mmormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=273105

There is still a Google cache of "What Jimmy Savile Really Did"

Posted By: MrFusion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 1-Apr-2013 19:13:37

In Response To: Website Revealing “What Jimmy Savile Really Did?” Has Been Pulled (namaste)
Google cache:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:themadlands.wordpress.com%2...

Google caches of other articles from the site are still available as well. To access them go this link:

https://www.google.com/search?q=themadlands.wordpress.com

And the hover over an article you want, then hover over the double arrow that will appear to the right, then click on the "cached" link that appears. These may not be available for long.

The text of the site mentioned in the previous post:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What Jimmy Savile Really Did

March 27, 2013 by themadlands

If you are not following the revelations about Jimmy Savile closely and believe that he was a loaner who touched-up a few young groupies, then you have been deceived. Jimmy Savile’s actions go far beyond what you can even begin to believe: until you look at the evidence.

In this article I am going to tell you exactly how you have been deceived, why you have been deceived and why it matters to everyone in the UK.

All links in this piece open in new browser windows to allow you to read the further information in conjunction with this piece.

.
The Cover-up.

On 11th January 2013, the Metropolitan Police and the NSPCC published their joint report into the Operation Yewtree investigation, titled “Giving Victims A Voice”.

The problems with that report were twofold. Firstly they did not actually give all the victims a voice, only the ones who reported lower-level abuse (and considering the abuse revealed included raping mentally and physically disabled people, the high-level abuse must be, as you will learn, far, far beyond even that). It will also become clear as to why some of the worst abuse will never have been reported to the Police.

The reason for this dumbing-down through an incomplete investigation, and reporting on it, is simple. The authorities failed at all levels when it came to Savile. By limiting the horrors we, the public, find out about, the less likely it is that there will be a public outcry against those who knew about, covered-up for and participated in the abuse at all levels of our society.

The second problem is that their main conclusion was false. It was part of a cover-up. The cover-up is in place to hide from the British public one very simple fact:

Child abusers linked to Jimmy Savile go right to the top of our society and acted with the full knowledge of our Government, security services, Police, Judiciary and Press.
“Evidence” I hear you scream!

DS David Gray, who helped to lead the Savile investigation stated there was no evidence to suggest that he was part of a paedophile ring.

We are meant to belive that a man who abused children over six decades never formed close links with those who shared his sickness? We are meant to believe that a man who had the ear of Royalty, Prime Ministers and the Police was not well-connected enough to know of other paedophiles and act with them? This predatory paedophile acted alone, or at worst as part of a “loose network”.

That sounds to me like we are being deliberately led away from the truth?

Jimmy Savile’s nephew, Guy Marsden, told the press:

“Uncle Jimmy took me to his sick parties”.

In the article he goes on to say:

“A nephew of Sir Jimmy Savile yesterday told how his celebrity uncle attended ‘paedophile parties’.

Guy Marsden was just 13 when ‘Uncle Jimmy’ took him to a wealthy celebrity’s house in London in 1967 for the first of many sordid social gatherings.

Over the next 18 months, Guy and his friends went to numerous ‘parties’ where he believes men sexually abused girls and boys as young as ten. Savile was at many of these events, he said.”

“Guy said Savile sometimes arrived with a man dressed as a priest and he believed the young victims may have come from an orphanage or children’s home.”

Does that sound like a man who is not part of a high-level paedophile ring? How was he informed the parties were happening?

Surely by definition, a group of men arranging for care home children to be brought to private homes to be abused must be….a paedophile ring?

Marsden goes even further, stating:

“The group of runaways ended up in a fabulous house – believed to belong to a famous pop impresario – with a big indoor swimming pool. The celebrity home was one of the party venues.

‘At night you would get about 15 or 20 people turning up. There would be music and tables full of food, we couldn’t believe it. There was everything we needed and we just hung around.

‘At first we automatically assumed the children lived there, but we soon realised they didn’t. They would be brought there, sometimes by Uncle Jimmy, and would stay for six or seven hours until 3 or 4am. They were just little kids, boys and girls.”

Guy Marsden, an eye-witness, close to Savile and with nothing to hide, states clearly not only that a paedophile ring was active, but that “Uncle Jimmy” sometimes supplied the children.

If you had the head of operation Yewtree in front of you now, would you not ask:

It was also revealed that:

“A solicitor who acted for victims of child abuse in Jersey also told the Guardian that some former Haut de la Garenne residents, both women and men, now claim they were assaulted by Savile in the 1970s.

Alan Collins, a solicitor for several Haut de la Garenne victims, said “a handful” of former residents have now made abuse allegations about Savile. He said Savile’s name was mentioned several times during the police investigation of 2008 but that the evidence did not seem to stack up at the time.”

We are going to go down the rabbit hole a bit deeper now in relation to Jersey, so you can see the implications of what Jimmy Savile was part of. As you have already seen he was evidently a procurer of children for paedophile rings.

This excerpt is from the now defunct News of the World:

“The youngsters were told by care staff the boat rides were treats—only to be assaulted and RAPED at sea by pervert toffs.

Details of the sick attacks emerged as we discovered even more blood has been found in a bath in the dungeon underneath the Haut de la Garenne home—and in the drains. And our reporters have been told how builders on renovations at the home were urged by staff to BURN any bones they dug up.

We also uncover the full extent of the dark forces of corruption hampering the police investigation. We can reveal worried cops feel under so much pressure over the abuse allegations they are preparing to BYPASS Jersey’s own legal system and hand their evidence to our government.

This could include files on up to seven social workers and carers who worked at the sinister home—including one nicknamed the ‘pinball wizard’ who HURLED kids against the walls to see how far they would BOUNCE. At least two previous senior employees of children’s services on the island are also under investigation despite the attempts of corrupt former policemen, politicians and businessmen to scupper the inquiry.

We understand that two weeks ago Jersey ministers SECRETLY VOTED to have senior police investigator Lenny Harper removed from the case because they believed he was too open with the media. But the Chief of Police Graham Power refused.

One of the most serious lines of inquiry in the investigation is that children were regularly loaned to wealthy yachtsmen to “do with them what they chose for the day,” according to our source close to the investigation.

“Haut de la Garenne staff described the trips as a treat for children who spent long hours cooped up at the home. But in reality the kids were subjected to the vilest sexual abuse on board the luxury boats.

“Our source said: “The allegations about the yachting community have come in from a number of different people…”

I will go no further than to state that one of the people who regularly sailed around Jersey was The then Prime Minister Edward Heath.

Savile’s pal Edward Heath, who appeared on his BBC1 show Jim’ll Fix It, was Prime Minister at the time.

Bearing in mind what you have read so far and will read from this point on, can you begin to see the implications of what Jimmy Savile may have been involved in, and see reasons why the Government and security services would suppress the truth?

The link had been established between the scandal of care home children from Islington and Richmond being supplied to paedophile brothels, to paedophiles within the Palace.

Now I know you are thinking “I see where you are going, but this is circumstantial evidence. Just because there were paedophiles operating at the Palace, it does not mean Jimmy Savile knew that”.

Let’s just fill you in on a few more details.

Savile was not only “brought in” to help Charles and Diana. He was also called upon to aid Sarah Ferguson.

“I was helping her not get publicity rather than get it – to cool things down….”

Does Jimmy Savile seem a likely person to you to call upon to help you lower your profile? No, me neither. So you have to question the reason for his calling upon.

You probably also don’t know just how cosy he was with the Queen:

“As for Savile’s relationship with the Queen, he suggested it was somewhat lighthearted. “She thinks I’m odd because odd things always seem to happen when I’m at BP,” he said last year, referring to Buckingham Palace. “One time I was at a party there and the Queen said: ‘I do not recognise this person, I bear no responsibility if anything should happen’ – the Queen likes a joke. The next minute I bump into a lady who turns out to be Barbara Bush.

“When she sees me she says: ‘Jimmmyyyy!’ and flings her arms out and knocks champagne all over the woman next to her who says ‘S***!’ in a very loud voice and steps back in her high heel on to the foot of the woman behind. The Queen shook her head, took me by the arm, stood me against the wall and said: ‘Stay there and don’t move!’ So I did. After all she is the Queen.”

Diana mentioned Savile in the “squidgygate” tape:

“She was recorded saying: “Jimmy Savile rang me up yesterday, and he said: ‘I’m just ringing up, my girl, to tell you that His Nibs [Charles] has asked me to come and help out the redhead [Ferguson]‘.”
Along with his friendship with Prince Philip, until a reported falling out that nobody has ever heard a reason for, we have compelling evidence that Savile was welcome at the Palace. Able to basically wander into a Palace and speak with Royalty. A Palace whose staff contained an alleged paedophile ring linked to Elm Guest House.
On 16th February 2013 Exaro News reported that:
“Exaro has established that Haroon Kasir, known as Harry, who was co-manager of the guest house, used to boast that he was “best friends” with Savile. Kasir would tell friends how Savile used to visit him frequently.”
It was also said:
“Harry started to behave strangely after Jimmy died”.
Jimmy Savile. Elm Guest House. The Palace. Now do you see why what Jimmy really got up to has been brushed under the carpet?
.
One Final Drop Down The Rabbit Hole.
Some celebrities, such as Esther Rantzen, have been less than honest about what they really knew of Jimmy Savile. Esther for example, the “lovely lady” of childline, claimed she only heard one vague rumour back in the 1970′s and dismissed she knew any more in a gushing interview with Piers Morgan.
The problem is that she was told many times, as this article shows:
“ESTHER Rantzen faces claims that she failed to act on Jimmy Savile paedophile rumours.Abuse campaigner Shy Keenan says she alerted her 18 years ago.Shy — who represents the charity The Phoenix Post, a victims’ advocacy group — said she raised concerns she had heard about the depraved star when she was contributing to a TV show.”
Others, are being far more honest.
My final piece of the puzzle comes from Mr Andy Kershaw. In his article he says:

“When the news broke of Jimmy Savile’s death, I sat before the rolling television news channels in a state of exasperation and disbelief. Celebrities, media heavyweights, and even representatives of the great and the good, were scrambling to gush eulogies to a man they were eager to canonise as Saint Jimmy of Stoke Mandeville or, at least, a much-loved national treasure.Every one of these mourners knew better than to pay tribute. For every one of them, as creatures of the media or the entertainment industries, had, for years, heard the persistent rumours about the real Jimmy Savile. Even in death – and for another 12 months – Savile would continue to pull off a public relations swindle of spectacular audacity.”

Why This Matters To You.

Some have dismissed this scandal, even if you believe all I have told you, as all in the past. Old news. people now old or dead. irrelevant. A previous generation, different rules.

It Could not happen again.

Deep down you already know it could happen again. If they got away with it last time, there are probably protected people doing the same thing to innocent stolen children right now. Safe in the knowledge they can do what they want because the establishment is covering up for them.

I know you are thinking “why would they cover this evil up?”

One of the named people who was allegedly photographed at Elm guest house having sex with children was a top politician. He has links to both David Cameron and Nick Clegg and their families. If he is arrested, people will ask how on earth none of those people knew.

How did the security services, who vetted BBC employees throughout the 1960′s and 1970′s, not know about Savile, or Elm guest house and inform anyone? How was Savile allowed anywhere near the Royal family?

How did the currently serving politicians, who were at the time senior councillors and legal people linked to Islington and Richmond councils never hear about what was evidently a widespread scandal of child trafficking in their boroughs?

How did nobody in the BBC ever hear anything so dark and horrifying? Even with the current stories of yet more BBC paedophile rings involving staff on both Doctor Who and Eastenders showing that their “saw no evil, heard no evil” stance simply isn’t credible?

How did so many ex-Police and care workers never get listened to when they spoke out about both the scale of the abuse and the fact they were warned off, time after time after time?

The truth, whatever the exact details of what Jimmy did, or what the Politicians and others did, is:

THEY ALL KNEW.

THEY ALL KNOW.

THEY ARE ALL COVERING IT UP TO PROTECT THEIR OWN SKINS.