|
John Smith
|
progressiveslol wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 5:35pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 5:34pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 5:25pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 5:19pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 2:34pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 2:27pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 2:24pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 2:21pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 1:51pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 1:50pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 1:48pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 3 rd, 2012 at 1:48pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 2 nd, 2012 at 7:37pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2 nd, 2012 at 7:35pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 2 nd, 2012 at 6:27pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2 nd, 2012 at 6:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Jul 2 nd, 2012 at 6:23pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2 nd, 2012 at 6:16pm: I hope all those people that were having a go at Gillard for lieing now come out and blast Abbott for the same thing ... failure to do so will show them up as the hypocrites they are. Not bldy likely. Did he say 'there will be no' and then do it anyway to gain power. If not, then you are likely to remain upset. your a hypocrite ... he lied .. plain and simple. .. you can try and justify one lie as worse than the other, but your just playing semantics ... he lied .. no if's or buts ... a lie is a lie is a lie ...... HYPOCRITE WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Denial is a beautiful thang. You guys have zero clue on what the public is thinking or feeling about Gillard and her lie. Bask in your stupidity while you can. not debating with the public, I'm debating with you ... and your hypocrisy in calling Gillard a liar, but failing to do so with Abbott despite his numerous blatant deliberate lies .... HYPOCRITE I, like many Australians, are able to define our hatred for circumstance. so your happy to ignore lies, as long as they suit your political agenda? You aren't too bright are you. If I crack you over the head with a 4x2 or tap you on the arm with a finger, which circumstance do you define as being worse. under the law they are both assault. lol see. Thankyou for elaborating your brightness. Dim, almost sereal darkness. so you don't think they are both assault? not sure exactly why you think you'r so bright .... it's a simple concept .. assault is assault is assault as in a lie is a lie is a lie .... what part of that do you have difficulty with? It's fairly simple .... did Abbott lie? if so say so and stop pretending the sun shines through his arse .... I am human. The electorate is human. You sound like a computer. Beep, 4x2 in head beep, touch by 4x2 just same as touch beep of finger. Sorry I cant help you to understand why labor are losing so badly. don't try to change the topic ... are you admitting that Abbott lied? its a fairly simple concept .. why do you desist from admitting that Abbott lied? ... what does the truth frighten you so? You have gone off on another tangant, not I. you really do live in your own little world don't you? this started with my putting the call out for Abbott fans to admit that he lied .... the only tangent is happening in that little head of yours ... now, can you kindly admit that he lied, or admit that your a HYPOCRITE .... either will do What lie because I obviously am not effected by a touch from a finger. lets start with Wyallha will disapear when the carbon tax starts ( it's not quite the quote, but you get the gist of it) Repeated from someone else. A union dude. Not a lie because it was actually said. irrelevant that someone else said it .. Abbott said it repeatedly, knowing it was a load of crap .... and never once did he say it was an embellishment ...... if you hit someone after your friend does, will you claim it's not really a hit because someone else hit him first ......
|
Forum
Pages: 
