Both parties have committed to reduce carbon emissions to 5% below 1990 levels and will have to spend billions to achieve that goal!!!
1. Direct Action is expensive and less affective than putting a price on carbon.
2. 60% of the Coalitions reductions using Direct Action consists of storing carbon in soil which is not currently counted in the protocol.
3. Storing carbon in soil is experimental and research by the CSIRO indicates much less carbon can be stored than is claimed by the opposition.
4. Farmers have indicated the price offered by Tony Abbott of $10 a tonne is a joke and the price will be up to 10 times higher making Direct Action far more expensive.
5. Taxpayers will pay for Tony Abbott's Direct Action policy.
6. Direct Action will not work.
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2804206.htmlFor in the final analysis, our most basic common link, is that we all inhabit this small planet, we all breathe the same air, we all cherish our children's futures, and we are all mortal.
John F. Kennedy (1917 - 1963), Speech at The American University, Washington, D.C., June 10, 1963