Australian Politics Forum - Why R Homos and Greens so rude?

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #15 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:20pm Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:17pm: ... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:13pm: So anyway, Is "poovery" the correct word or not? Whatever you and your friends decide on, is fine with me. Language only works insofar as it is commonly understood, so no, it's not a matter of just deciding on a name.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26588 Australia	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #16 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:25pm http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Poovery 1. Poovery inappropriate and overt behaviour towards a samesex personage That boozer is a den of Poovery Nope wrong word sorry. SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude?
Reply #17 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:29pm

... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:20pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:17pm:

... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:13pm:

So anyway, Is "poovery" the correct word or not?

Whatever you and your friends decide on, is fine with me.

Language only works insofar as it is commonly understood, so no, it's not a matter of just deciding on a name.

Well, "a flock of" heteros is called a crowd.

Why don't you just use crowd?

Why do you need a special word?

Seeing as you asked though, how about: 'closet', or 'flame'?

Undecided

Back to top

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude?
Reply #18 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:31pm

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:29pm:

... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:20pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:17pm:

... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:13pm:

So anyway, Is "poovery" the correct word or not?

Whatever you and your friends decide on, is fine with me.

Language only works insofar as it is commonly understood, so no, it's not a matter of just deciding on a name.

Well, "a flock of" heteros is called a crowd.

Why don't you just use crowd?

Why do you need a special word?

Seeing as you asked though, how about: 'closet', or 'flame'?

Undecided

ahhhuunno.

Why is a "murder of crows" not just a "flock of crows"? Why do those black bastards need a special name? they just do.

Your suggestions are OK, but I reckon a "mince" is better.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

Gist

Gold Member

Offline

I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476

Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude?
Reply #19 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:32pm

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:29pm:

... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:20pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:17pm:

... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:13pm:

So anyway, Is "poovery" the correct word or not?

Whatever you and your friends decide on, is fine with me.

Language only works insofar as it is commonly understood, so no, it's not a matter of just deciding on a name.

Well, "a flock of" heteros is called a crowd.

Why don't you just use crowd?

Why do you need a special word?

Seeing as you asked though, how about: 'closet', or 'flame'?

Undecided

But then how could he indulge in poovery?

Back to top

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)

IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #20 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:35pm I thought Cwissy Pyne let the cat out of the bag a couple of week ago, they are called gazelles.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude?
Reply #21 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 3:47pm

skippy. wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:06pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 12:49pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 8:05am:

The thing that gets me with the pro gay marriage lobby is that anyone who objects to gay marriage must, by definition, be homophobic. I have gay relatives and gay friends who I love dearly - but personally I do not believe that marriage laws should be changed to allow gay marriages.

you make a good point. Not agreeing with gay marriage is hardly definitionally homophobic. After all, a gay former Chief CJustice of the High Court also opposes gay marriage. is he therefore homophobic?

Name him or its just another one of your lies.

BUMP before longlyingfraud goes and hides under his rock ,again.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

Gist Gold Member Offline I am not a sock, I am a human being! Posts: 5476	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #22 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 3:48pm skippy. wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 2:35pm: I thought Cwissy Pyne let the cat out of the bag a couple of week ago, they are called gazelles.
Back to top	"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration) IP Logged

Andrei.Hicks

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male

Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude?
Reply #23 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 3:50pm

I don't know why on earth this is still issue - it affects like a miniscule portion of the population - hairdressers, wedding planners, interior designers and make up artists.

Straight people marry.

Ponces can register their friendship in a book or something.

Done. Dusted. Now let's concentrate on things which affect people like taxes, the economy, jobs etc....

bugger me dead what is the matter with people.
Talking about two fellas 'marrying' - what on earth would our ancestors make of this????

Back to top

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #24 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 3:55pm We've already deal with that Andrei, and moved on to biger issues. namely, what is a the correct term for a group of homos?
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Uncle Meat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2434 Tasmania Gender:	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #25 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 3:59pm ... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 3:55pm: We've already deal with that Andrei, and moved on to biger issues. namely, what is a the correct term for a group of homos? Grandmaster et al. ?
Back to top	IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #26 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 4:00pm hohoho. But there's nothing wrong with that, is there?
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

Uncle Meat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2434 Tasmania Gender:	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #27 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 4:04pm ... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 4:00pm: hohoho. But there's nothing wrong with that, is there? No, no, of course not! People's personal sexual preferences are nobody's business but their own!
Back to top	IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26588 Australia	Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude? Reply #28 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 4:06pm Quote: Ponces can register their friendship in a book or something. Because in order to piss off ppl like you they have to get married. The sooner the better. SOB
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Why R Homos and Greens so rude?
Reply #29 - Jun 12^th, 2012 at 4:14pm

Uncle Meat wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 4:04pm:

... wrote on Jun 12^th, 2012 at 4:00pm:

hohoho.

But there's nothing wrong with that, is there?

No, no, of course not! People's personal sexual preferences are nobody's business but their own!

Exactly right.

So long as they leave it at their sexual preferences, and don't demand society validate their relationship with their friend/dog/pet rock as equal to a real relationship.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged