Well, you have the Australia concept of being a 'wealthy' nation only because our population doesn't grow for want of Boat People and New Zealanders or because our women work long hours to keep up with the high cost of living a certain lifestyle with the latest 'technology'.

In essence, if Australia was OPENED UP and the population here suddenly boomed, then - like a Pandora Box, the rest of the World's population might decline due to our 'Minimalistic' nature?

We are anti-youth and pro-aged care. Don't believe the TV, it just doesn't relate to here and is still stuck in America you could say. The statistics prove that we have the highest ratio of Aged in the world. So there you have it - we aren't pro-youth like an over-populated Mexico or India, USA, etc.

eg: One nation has a booming, self-sufficient population growth. Two Adults (hetero) have five kids.

Another nation with a high divorce rate has one kid with two sets of parents. So this kid is surrounded by a sense of wisdom and maturity, etc.

So the chances of the kids of the first nation just breeding and the kid from the second nation achieving.

Alas, the first provides stupidity/weakness and over-population, the other doesn't breed at all.

So you see why Australia is why it is and what its real agenda for the world is. Forget about the position of Prime Minister regardless of who it is - as the 'leader' of this nation. They haven't a clue let alone a sense of true empowerment here.

Also, the fact that Australia - if it isn't opened up: provides a living example of 'quality' of living rather than quantity. That is that we become long-lived: longevity and I don't mean by wealth. Something else entirely ...but thats another secret

...and thus the concept of a hetero relationship is one of no consequence. In fact, at the most - some, like in Hollywood are more for 'career enhancements'. So having sex without consequence (that is: children/procreation/family/outbreeding other races/etc) is all the rage and even a neurologist can explain that a certain part of a brain doesn't perform strongly because of all the 'weak' bondings that occur from 'flings' and 'casual sex' to the point that a person who has been contraceptively swayed in regards to sex - finds it hard to have a long-term relationship at all.
This is also possibly and I say possibly, why many homo-sexual relationships are happening. Bored of having shallow non-committal experiences with the opposite sex "Well, maybe same-sex will work?". But in truth, it really comes down with "Hell people, you should have just forgot about relationships in the first place and just focus upon working/studying towards some great achievement."

So jump on that horse of Celibacy
try not to fall off the other side and kiss the dirt
in the name of homo-sexuality
and ride off into the sunset of success.

Also, thanks to the Pill. You now have a male known as a Tool. He gets laughed at a lot in the workplace by his fellow males because he is a bit of an idiot. He thinks he's a big stud with the women, because they use guys like that as something akin to a vibrator or dildo. These guys become sexualisedly vain (often Gay) and complete bores in any conversation beyond a zoo magazine (cuz maybe beastiality will get marriage rights too one day?).

Anyway - there you have it. The Pill is good for you and an over-populated nation. But it is also bad for you and 'breeds' a false sense of achievement and success.

...just my opinion

What a bizarre poll.

Women the world over should be given easy access to the pill.

Since when has it been "free" ?

nar thats what caesareans are supposed to be used for.

Quote:


Bear in mind these are 1999 stats, and they have continued to rise since then.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 7^th, 2012 at 5:09pm:



No, they didn't stop it.

In Australia in 2006, more than 30% of women who gave birth had a caesarean.


More than half of all caesareans in Australia are due to the effects of intervention or for reasons other than medically indicated.

http://www.mybirth.com.au/intervention/caesarean.html

Quote:


It delivers measurably poorer health outcomes for the child.  For a start the baby will naturally come when it's ready - scheduled caesars commonly get it before it's ready, leading to tense times in the neonatal ward.  Also, getting squished through the birth canal helps prime their body for survival outside the womb.  check the link above for more.
On the one hand, doctors push it so they can make more money, but on the other, many chicks choose it for selfish reasons.

Okay the reasons "that may not be essential" I suppose are the "selfish reasons". Looks like they are up to the mother though.

SOB

Why did i read that? Now i will never get that time back . . . .

SOB

bludger wrote on Jun 6^th, 2012 at 9:33pm:


There is every chance that the world population will stabilise by mid century. The current population increase in Africa, which is the main area of growth, is not sustainable.

It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Jun 9^th, 2012 at 8:04pm:


I agree. I meant sustainable in terms of - it can't go on, rather than environmental sustainability.