Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Australia for Sale (Read 927 times)
tonegunman1
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 427
Australia for Sale
May 31st, 2012 at 12:38pm
 
Interesting Gillard says that the minerals don't belong to the miners or to her but that she holds them on trust for the Australian sovereign people.
This at the very time that Craig Emerson is off in China with the for sale signs for large tracts of northern Australia.
Trust...now there's a concept.
Maybe what she meant to say is the she holds the land on trust for the Chinese people or the American people but surely not the Australian people.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PoliticalReality
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 155
Gender: male
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #1 - May 31st, 2012 at 12:42pm
 
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:38pm:
Interesting Gillard says that the minerals don't belong to the miners or to her but that she holds them on trust for the Australian sovereign people.
This at the very time that Craig Emerson is off in China with the for sale signs for large tracts of northern Australia.
Trust...now there's a concept.
Maybe what she meant to say is the she holds the land on trust for the Chinese people or the American people but surely not the Australian people.


You could sell all the land in Australia to China and the minerals underneath it would still belong to the Australian people ...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29274
Gender: male
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #2 - May 31st, 2012 at 12:46pm
 
PoliticalReality wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:42pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:38pm:
Interesting Gillard says that the minerals don't belong to the miners or to her but that she holds them on trust for the Australian sovereign people.
This at the very time that Craig Emerson is off in China with the for sale signs for large tracts of northern Australia.
Trust...now there's a concept.
Maybe what she meant to say is the she holds the land on trust for the Chinese people or the American people but surely not the Australian people.


You could sell all the land in Australia to China and the minerals underneath it would still belong to the Australian people ...


But we wouldn't be allowed to mine it as we wouldn't own any of that land - the Chinese would.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26589
Australia
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #3 - May 31st, 2012 at 12:48pm
 
Australia was sold a long time ago. Its between china and america now - they can dook it out.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
tonegunman1
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 427
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #4 - May 31st, 2012 at 12:48pm
 
PoliticalReality wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:42pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:38pm:
Interesting Gillard says that the minerals don't belong to the miners or to her but that she holds them on trust for the Australian sovereign people.
This at the very time that Craig Emerson is off in China with the for sale signs for large tracts of northern Australia.
Trust...now there's a concept.
Maybe what she meant to say is the she holds the land on trust for the Chinese people or the American people but surely not the Australian people.


You could sell all the land in Australia to China and the minerals underneath it would still belong to the Australian people ...


Well actually they belong to the states...but I won't quibble.
Regardless she seems pretty keen to put foreign interests ahead of Australian...jobs, land, minerals, selling coal carbon tax free,...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BlOoDy RiPpEr
Gold Member
*****
Offline


aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #5 - May 31st, 2012 at 12:55pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:48pm:
Australia was sold a long time ago. Its between china and america now - they can dook it out.

SOB

I wouldn't hold your breath on that one, china has started buying up the USA as well. they have already started buying USA media.
Back to top
 

host of the aussie-patriot.com site
WWW  
IP Logged
 
PoliticalReality
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 155
Gender: male
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #6 - May 31st, 2012 at 1:06pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:46pm:
PoliticalReality wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:42pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:38pm:
Interesting Gillard says that the minerals don't belong to the miners or to her but that she holds them on trust for the Australian sovereign people.
This at the very time that Craig Emerson is off in China with the for sale signs for large tracts of northern Australia.
Trust...now there's a concept.
Maybe what she meant to say is the she holds the land on trust for the Chinese people or the American people but surely not the Australian people.


You could sell all the land in Australia to China and the minerals underneath it would still belong to the Australian people ...


But we wouldn't be allowed to mine it as we wouldn't own any of that land - the Chinese would.


lol ask the farmers if owning the land stops people from mining it

To be honest I'm not overly fussed if it's rich Australian's owning the land, or if its rich Chinese - they're all still rich and rich people are same the world over.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tonegunman1
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 427
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #7 - May 31st, 2012 at 1:26pm
 
PoliticalReality wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 1:06pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:46pm:
PoliticalReality wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:42pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:38pm:
Interesting Gillard says that the minerals don't belong to the miners or to her but that she holds them on trust for the Australian sovereign people.
This at the very time that Craig Emerson is off in China with the for sale signs for large tracts of northern Australia.
Trust...now there's a concept.
Maybe what she meant to say is the she holds the land on trust for the Chinese people or the American people but surely not the Australian people.


You could sell all the land in Australia to China and the minerals underneath it would still belong to the Australian people ...


But we wouldn't be allowed to mine it as we wouldn't own any of that land - the Chinese would.


lol ask the farmers if owning the land stops people from mining it

To be honest I'm not overly fussed if it's rich Australian's owning the land, or if its rich Chinese - they're all still rich and rich people are same the world over.


There's a lot of difference in the amount of taxation. Multinational companies based in other countries pay considerably less tax to Australia. Gillard is far from acting as a fiduciary or trustee is pimping out Australia for short term gain without a thought to the consequences to our future.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #8 - May 31st, 2012 at 5:04pm
 
it doesnt matter what is below the surface it belongs to the people.. if you discovered gold on your plot of land they would take it from you..

stands to reason...

why do you think all miners have to have a licence???..

it gives them rights.. not liberty..

and if you think the govt of the day will stand by and let you do what you like with your property, or whats under the ground... you have another think coming I am afraid..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14248
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #9 - May 31st, 2012 at 5:13pm
 
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 1:26pm:
There's a lot of difference in the amount of taxation. Multinational companies based in other countries pay considerably less tax to Australia.





Then LET them mine Australian minerals  in Zimbabwe

Frankly, I'd rather see them remain in the GROUND, for the time being, than have the likes of Piggy Rinehart and Porky Palmer set the price and worth of these resources to the Australian owners


NO government, representing EVERY Australian, should EVER whimper away from such threats





Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #10 - May 31st, 2012 at 6:17pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 5:13pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 1:26pm:
There's a lot of difference in the amount of taxation. Multinational companies based in other countries pay considerably less tax to Australia.





Then LET them mine Australian minerals  in Zimbabwe

Frankly, I'd rather see them remain in the GROUND, for the time being, than have the likes of Piggy Rinehart and Porky Palmer set the price and worth of these resources to the Australian owners


NO government, representing EVERY Australian, should EVER whimper away from such threats









so if Therese Rudd decided to buy into mining tomorrow you would shut it all down as well.. yeah right..


what the hell is it there for??????????????????

where would we be if they never discovered coal...imagine if the greenies had had their way 150 years ago.. we would still be riding horses
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prevailing
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #11 - May 31st, 2012 at 6:46pm
 
You have  to watch  the Maggot, he is planning on setting up far  north Queensland for lease sale to other countries to use for their food security...
Back to top
 

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men
 
IP Logged
 
bobbythefap1
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #12 - May 31st, 2012 at 7:25pm
 
cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 6:17pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 5:13pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 1:26pm:
There's a lot of difference in the amount of taxation. Multinational companies based in other countries pay considerably less tax to Australia.





Then LET them mine Australian minerals  in Zimbabwe

Frankly, I'd rather see them remain in the GROUND, for the time being, than have the likes of Piggy Rinehart and Porky Palmer set the price and worth of these resources to the Australian owners


NO government, representing EVERY Australian, should EVER whimper away from such threats









so if Therese Rudd decided to buy into mining tomorrow you would shut it all down as well.. yeah right..


what the hell is it there for??????????????????

where would we be if they never discovered coal...imagine if the greenies had had their way 150 years ago.. we would still be riding horses
If everyone was like you we would never have embraced science and most of us would still believe in fairy tales
Back to top
 

A day without sunshine is like night.
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14248
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #13 - May 31st, 2012 at 9:44pm
 
cods wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 6:17pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 5:13pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 1:26pm:
There's a lot of difference in the amount of taxation. Multinational companies based in other countries pay considerably less tax to Australia.





Then LET them mine Australian minerals  in Zimbabwe

Frankly, I'd rather see them remain in the GROUND, for the time being, than have the likes of Miss Piggy Rinehart and Porky Palmer set the price and worth of these resources to the Australian owners


NO government, representing EVERY Australian, should EVER whimper away from such threats









so if Therese Rudd decided to buy into mining tomorrow you would shut it all down as well.. yeah right..







If she was reaping in SUPER PROFITS on an UNDER PRICED resource - and refused to pay Australians a FAIR PRICE ?


YES



REMEMBER, we can ONLY  sell this mineral reserve ONCE





Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
jay82
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14
Gender: male
Re: Australia for Sale
Reply #14 - May 31st, 2012 at 9:54pm
 
PoliticalReality wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 1:06pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:46pm:
PoliticalReality wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:42pm:
tonegunman1 wrote on May 31st, 2012 at 12:38pm:
Interesting Gillard says that the minerals don't belong to the miners or to her but that she holds them on trust for the Australian sovereign people.
This at the very time that Craig Emerson is off in China with the for sale signs for large tracts of northern Australia.
Trust...now there's a concept.
Maybe what she meant to say is the she holds the land on trust for the Chinese people or the American people but surely not the Australian people.


You could sell all the land in Australia to China and the minerals underneath it would still belong to the Australian people ...


But we wouldn't be allowed to mine it as we wouldn't own any of that land - the Chinese would.


lol ask the farmers if owning the land stops people from mining it

To be honest I'm not overly fussed if it's rich Australian's owning the land, or if its rich Chinese - they're all still rich and rich people are same the world over.


I second that and indeed if FDI comes in, it will benefit as awhole
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print