Australian Politics Forum - Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #90 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:09pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:07pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:04pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:01pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 2:59pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 2:57pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 2:42pm:

So while global warming caused extinctions in the past, somehow this one wont ?

It might, it might not.

I'm keeping an open mind on the subject.

you have actually closed your mind.

Closed up and turned the lights off.

Grin

Please explain.

How did you come to that conclusion?

By reading your posts. You've made up your mind to ignore the logical, and embrace the radical.

Incorrect.

Explain which part of this you don't understand:

" ... currently, I don't subscribe to the AGW hypothesis (as the evidence is less than reliable), however, I'm willing to keep an open-mind on the subject and will analyse each new piece of evidence that is presented. In the future I may very well support the AGW hypothesis, that is, if any credible and reliable evidence is eventually presented."

You can't honestly read that and say I don't have an open mind on the subject. Roll Eyes

Maybe where you get your evidence from is the problem. In peer reviewed journals from scientists, weve had 10 years of almost unanimous reinforcement of AGW.
To ignore that is to close your mind to the logical.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2434 Tasmania Gender:	Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline. Reply #91 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:10pm Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:04pm: By reading your posts. You've made up your mind to ignore the logical, and embrace the radical. Which words don't you understand? "I'm keeping an open mind on the subject." (from my previous post)
Back to top	IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #92 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:12pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:10pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:04pm:

By reading your posts. You've made up your mind to ignore the logical, and embrace the radical.

Which words don't you understand?

"I'm keeping an open mind on the subject." (from my previous post)

Undecided

Saying something, while doing the opposite does not compute

Your actions speak louder than words.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #93 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:16pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:09pm:

Maybe where you get your evidence from is the problem. In peer reviewed journals from scientists, weve had 10 years of almost unanimous reinforcement of AGW.
To ignore that is to close your mind to the logical.

I'm starting to think you have a reading problem.

My previous posts clearly demonstrate that I am not ignoring the evidence in support of AGW:

"A, B and C have caused warming in the past therefore we can not exclude them as possible causes of current warming. However, D could also be a contributor and it should not be ignored. Even though the current evidence supporting D is dubious, we'll keep an open mind on the subject."

" ... currently, I don't subscribe to the AGW hypothesis (as the evidence is less than reliable), however, I'm willing to keep an open-mind on the subject and will analyse each new piece of evidence that is presented. In the future I may very well support the AGW hypothesis, that is, if any credible and reliable evidence is eventually presented."

"It might, it might not.

I'm keeping an open mind on the subject."

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #94 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:17pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:12pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:10pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:04pm:

By reading your posts. You've made up your mind to ignore the logical, and embrace the radical.

Which words don't you understand?

"I'm keeping an open mind on the subject." (from my previous post)

Undecided

Saying something, while doing the opposite does not compute

Your actions speak louder than words.

What am I "doing" that is the opposite?

Where have you seen me carry out these "actions"?

Please enlighten me.

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #95 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:12pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:10pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:04pm:

By reading your posts. You've made up your mind to ignore the logical, and embrace the radical.

Which words don't you understand?

"I'm keeping an open mind on the subject." (from my previous post)

Undecided

Saying something, while doing the opposite does not compute

Your actions speak louder than words.

What am I "doing" that is the opposite?

Please enlighten me.

After reading 10 years of almost unanimous scientific peer-reviewed journals tracking mans contribution to AGW, how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion, and then claim to be open minded.

That, is a pure definition of closed mindedness.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2434 Tasmania Gender:	Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline. Reply #96 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm: ... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ... Excuse me? What conclusion?
Back to top	IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #97 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:25pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm:

... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ...

Excuse me? What conclusion?

Only you would know what your mind has contrived up. But it does appear to excuse man from being responsible.

If you are just going to ask dumb questions, you'll join my ignore list.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #98 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:30pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:25pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm:

... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ...

Excuse me? What conclusion?

Only you would know what your mind has contrived up. But it does appear to excuse man from being responsible.

If you are just going to ask dumb questions, you'll join my ignore list.

No dumb questions, just serious ones.

1. What conclusion?

2. What am I "doing" that is the opposite (what "actions")?

These are perfectly legitimate questions. How about an answer, or two?

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #99 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:36pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:17pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:12pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:10pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:04pm:

By reading your posts. You've made up your mind to ignore the logical, and embrace the radical.

Which words don't you understand?

"I'm keeping an open mind on the subject." (from my previous post)

Undecided

Saying something, while doing the opposite does not compute

Your actions speak louder than words.

What am I "doing" that is the opposite?

Where have you seen me carry out these "actions"?

Please enlighten me.

Why can't you answer these questions?

Don't make accusations and then run away. Please answer the questions.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2434 Tasmania Gender:	Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline. Reply #100 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:37pm Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm: ... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ... Excuse me? What conclusion? Too hard? Come on, answer the question.
Back to top	IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #101 - May 21^st, 2012 at 3:48pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:37pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm:

... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ...

Excuse me? What conclusion?

Too hard? Come on, answer the question.

Are you asking me to guess you position on AGW ?

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #102 - May 21^st, 2012 at 4:01pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:48pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:37pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm:

... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ...

Excuse me? What conclusion?

Too hard? Come on, answer the question.

Are you asking me to guess you position on AGW ?

You said "how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion?"

What conclusion?

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #103 - May 21^st, 2012 at 4:03pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:48pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:37pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm:

... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ...

Excuse me? What conclusion?

Too hard? Come on, answer the question.

Are you asking me to guess you position on AGW ?

No need to guess, I've said it many times:

" currently, I don't subscribe to the AGW hypothesis (as the evidence is less than reliable), however, I'm willing to keep an open-mind on the subject and will analyse each new piece of evidence that is presented. In the future I may very well support the AGW hypothesis, that is, if any credible and reliable evidence is eventually presented."

Did you miss that?

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #104 - May 21^st, 2012 at 4:10pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 4:03pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:48pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:37pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:21pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 3:20pm:

... how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion ...

Excuse me? What conclusion?

Too hard? Come on, answer the question.

Are you asking me to guess you position on AGW ?

No need to guess, I've said it many times:

" currently, I don't subscribe to the AGW hypothesis (as the evidence is less than reliable), however, I'm willing to keep an open-mind on the subject and will analyse each new piece of evidence that is presented. In the future I may very well support the AGW hypothesis, that is, if any credible and reliable evidence is eventually presented."

Did you miss that?

... and so to repeat myself, your position as stated, can only come from a closed mind...

After reading 10 years of almost unanimous scientific peer-reviewed journals tracking mans contribution to AGW, how can you suddenly come to the exact opposite conclusion, and then claim to be open minded.

That, is a pure definition of closed mindedness.

Back to top

IP Logged