Australian Politics Forum - Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #150 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:58pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:37am:

There is no such thing as a AGW skeptic anymore, Same as there is no such thing as a spherical-earth skeptic any more.

Both concepts are so well proven, anyone "questioning" them is just a denier.

Well, you've pretty much destroyed any credibility you had with this one post.

It turns out that you are in fact the denier: there are indeed many AGW sceptics. Just because you don't agree with them it doesn't mean they don't exist.

And, a hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Climate change is a scientific issue. You seem to keep forgetting that.

Uncle Meat can't understand that no one denies the earth is round! Cheesy

Uncle meat does not deny it. He is sceptical of it.
And he's certainly not going to be fooled by those doctored photos nasa hand out. Nasa, are obviously infiltrated by left wingers who push that climate change stuff as well.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #151 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:59pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:37am:

There is no such thing as a AGW skeptic anymore, Same as there is no such thing as a spherical-earth skeptic any more.

Both concepts are so well proven, anyone "questioning" them is just a denier.

Well, you've pretty much destroyed any credibility you had with this one post.

It turns out that you are in fact the denier: there are indeed many AGW sceptics. Just because you don't agree with them it doesn't mean they don't exist.

And, a hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Climate change is a scientific issue. You seem to keep forgetting that.

Uncle Meat can't understand that no one denies the earth is round! Cheesy

Keep trying: I'm sure you'll get something right, one day.

"Strange but True: Earth Is Not RoundIt may seem round when viewed from space, but our planet is actually a bumpy spheroid ... "

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=earth-is-not-round

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #152 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:03pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:59pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:37am:

There is no such thing as a AGW skeptic anymore, Same as there is no such thing as a spherical-earth skeptic any more.

Both concepts are so well proven, anyone "questioning" them is just a denier.

Well, you've pretty much destroyed any credibility you had with this one post.

It turns out that you are in fact the denier: there are indeed many AGW sceptics. Just because you don't agree with them it doesn't mean they don't exist.

And, a hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Climate change is a scientific issue. You seem to keep forgetting that.

Uncle Meat can't understand that no one denies the earth is round! Cheesy

Keep trying: I'm sure you'll get something right, one day.

"Strange but True: Earth Is Not RoundIt may seem round when viewed from space, but our planet is actually a bumpy spheroid ... "

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=earth-is-not-round

Which of course, you are sceptical of.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #153 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:06pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:58pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:37am:

There is no such thing as a AGW skeptic anymore, Same as there is no such thing as a spherical-earth skeptic any more.

Both concepts are so well proven, anyone "questioning" them is just a denier.

Well, you've pretty much destroyed any credibility you had with this one post.

It turns out that you are in fact the denier: there are indeed many AGW sceptics. Just because you don't agree with them it doesn't mean they don't exist.

And, a hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Climate change is a scientific issue. You seem to keep forgetting that.

Uncle Meat can't understand that no one denies the earth is round! Cheesy

Uncle meat does not deny it. He is sceptical of it.
And he's certainly not going to be fooled by those doctored photos nasa hand out. Nasa, are obviously infiltrated by left wingers who push that climate change stuff as well.

You're having another bad day, aren't you? Roll Eyes

"The actual shape of the Earth is actually an oblate spheroid – a sphere with a bulge around the equator."

http://www.universetoday.com/25893/is-the-earth-round/

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3808	Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline. Reply #154 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:08pm Uncle meat says. More NASA lies:
Back to top	IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #155 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:14pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:03pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:59pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:37am:

There is no such thing as a AGW skeptic anymore, Same as there is no such thing as a spherical-earth skeptic any more.

Both concepts are so well proven, anyone "questioning" them is just a denier.

Well, you've pretty much destroyed any credibility you had with this one post.

It turns out that you are in fact the denier: there are indeed many AGW sceptics. Just because you don't agree with them it doesn't mean they don't exist.

And, a hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Climate change is a scientific issue. You seem to keep forgetting that.

Uncle Meat can't understand that no one denies the earth is round! Cheesy

Keep trying: I'm sure you'll get something right, one day.

"Strange but True: Earth Is Not RoundIt may seem round when viewed from space, but our planet is actually a bumpy spheroid ... "

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=earth-is-not-round

Which of course, you are sceptical of.

I'm sceptical of your knowledge of science.

Remember, you're the one who said that AGW has been proven.

In fact, you said "well proven".

And I told you then what I'll tell you now:

A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Yes, I'm very sceptical of your scientific "knowledge".

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #156 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:17pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:14pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:03pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:59pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 2:08pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 11:37am:

There is no such thing as a AGW skeptic anymore, Same as there is no such thing as a spherical-earth skeptic any more.

Both concepts are so well proven, anyone "questioning" them is just a denier.

Well, you've pretty much destroyed any credibility you had with this one post.

It turns out that you are in fact the denier: there are indeed many AGW sceptics. Just because you don't agree with them it doesn't mean they don't exist.

And, a hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Climate change is a scientific issue. You seem to keep forgetting that.

Uncle Meat can't understand that no one denies the earth is round! Cheesy

Keep trying: I'm sure you'll get something right, one day.

"Strange but True: Earth Is Not RoundIt may seem round when viewed from space, but our planet is actually a bumpy spheroid ... "

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=earth-is-not-round

Which of course, you are sceptical of.

I'm sceptical of your knowledge of science.

Remember, you're the one who said that AGW has been proven.

In fact, you said "well proven".

And I told you then what I'll tell you now:

A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true. There is no such thing as scientific proof.

Yes, I'm very sceptical of your scientific "knowledge".

Your arguing semantics again (deniers 101). Everyone knows when they say the earth is "round" they mean "roughly spherical". Everyone knows that when they say AGW is proven, they mean "scientific consensus, and beyond resonable doubt".

If you are going to keep up this silly word game, you might as well leave.

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #157 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:27pm

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:17pm:

Your arguing semantics again (deniers 101). Everyone knows when they say the earth is "round" they mean "roughly spherical". Everyone knows that when they say AGW is proven, they mean "scientific consensus, and beyond resonable doubt".

If you are going to keep up this silly word game, you might as well leave.

There are two things that anyone with an ounce of common sense or any basic understanding of climate science do not do:

1. claim that a hypothesis has been well proven.

2. try to deflect the issue by introducing a discussion on spherical-earth skeptics.

Today, you have done both.

Congratulations.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #158 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:37pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:27pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:17pm:

Your arguing semantics again (deniers 101). Everyone knows when they say the earth is "round" they mean "roughly spherical". Everyone knows that when they say AGW is proven, they mean "scientific consensus, and beyond resonable doubt".

If you are going to keep up this silly word game, you might as well leave.

There are two things that anyone with an ounce of common sense or any basic understanding of climate science do not do:

1. claim that a hypothesis has been well proven.

2. try to deflect the issue by introducing a discussion on spherical-earth skeptics.

Today, you have done both.

Congratulations.

Lol, I think I feel Uncle Meats hand down my pants!

And I like it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #159 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:40pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:37pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:27pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:17pm:

Your arguing semantics again (deniers 101). Everyone knows when they say the earth is "round" they mean "roughly spherical". Everyone knows that when they say AGW is proven, they mean "scientific consensus, and beyond resonable doubt".

If you are going to keep up this silly word game, you might as well leave.

There are two things that anyone with an ounce of common sense or any basic understanding of climate science do not do:

1. claim that a hypothesis has been well proven.

2. try to deflect the issue by introducing a discussion on spherical-earth skeptics.

Today, you have done both.

Congratulations.

Lol, I think I feel Uncle Meats hand down my pants!

And I like it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline. Reply #160 - May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:59pm oh, uncle meat pleeeeeeeeeease flog me harder !!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #161 - May 24^th, 2012 at 7:40am

Uncle Meat wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:27pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 23^rd, 2012 at 5:17pm:

Your arguing semantics again (deniers 101). Everyone knows when they say the earth is "round" they mean "roughly spherical". Everyone knows that when they say AGW is proven, they mean "scientific consensus, and beyond resonable doubt".

If you are going to keep up this silly word game, you might as well leave.

There are two things that anyone with an ounce of common sense or any basic understanding of climate science do not do:

1. claim that a hypothesis has been well proven.

2. try to deflect the issue by introducing a discussion on spherical-earth skeptics.

Today, you have done both.

Congratulations.

I agree, you will not find climate scientists say AGW has been definitively proven, but what we are hearing, over and over again, are terms like high confidence and very high confidence or very likely and extremely likely. So what we are talking about are extremely cautious, and by nature skeptical people, being 90 to 95% certain of anthropogenic warming.

If you want to play those odds, I don't want you, or anyone like you, near my chips.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

Avram Horowitz Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3153 Australia Gender:	Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline. Reply #162 - May 24^th, 2012 at 8:08am So why are you in favor of the world's biggest polluter being able to pollute even more (who emits 30% of the entire pollution) ?
Back to top	IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #163 - May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm

MOTR wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:40am:

If you want to play those odds, I don't want you, or anyone like you, near my chips.

"play those odds" ???

What on earth are you talking about?

I'm an AGW sceptic. That's it. Full stop. End of discussion.

I'm not standing in the way of anyone taking action against the threat of AGW (whether real or not). I just have a different opinion on the science.

Are you seriously suggesting that I'm jeopardising your future by merely questioning the "science" behind AGW?

Get real Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Record Temperatures in the Pipeline.
Reply #164 - May 24^th, 2012 at 12:50pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:36pm:

MOTR wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 7:40am:

If you want to play those odds, I don't want you, or anyone like you, near my chips.

"play those odds" ???

What on earth are you talking about?

I'm an AGW sceptic. That's it. Full stop. End of discussion.

I'm not standing in the way of anyone taking action against the threat of AGW (whether real or not). I just have a different opinion on the science.

Are you seriously suggesting that I'm jeopardising your future by merely questioning the "science" behind AGW?

Get real Roll Eyes

You are a denier, not a sceptic. And as a denier you see your role to continually put doubt into any combined effort to stop AGW. Because it will take a combined effort.

Back to top

IP Logged