Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15
th, 2012 at 8:06am:
So what gives that kangaroo court any credibility?
Malaysia has not ratified the Rome statute for the ICC and looking at the list of signatories there are no Islamic countries that have ratified the rome statute yet they still want their own unofficial kangaroo court.
If you want to use the ICC then you have to sign the Rome Statute.
The Geneva conventions have not been ratified by Islamic countries so how can they claim war crimes when they dont even want ratify this convention,chopping Nick Bergs head off was a war crime,chopping the heads off prisoners is a war crime.
The Universal declaration of human rights was not ratified by any Islamic countries because it violates Islamic law, how does human rights violate religious laws?
They were found guilty in a kangaroo court, they have to sign the Rome statute if they want to take them to the ICC.
http://www.iccnow.org/documents/signatory_chart_Nov_2011_EN.pdfThe Anzus treaty would have put us in Iraq and Afghanistan regardless of which party was leading the country at the time.