MOTR wrote on May 13
th, 2012 at 5:02pm:
cods wrote on May 13
th, 2012 at 4:50pm:
MOTR wrote on May 13
th, 2012 at 4:42pm:
How can you not accept a vote from the cross benches. Can the sponsor of a bill tell the speaker not to accept a certain vote, or would you have to force one of your own to abstain.
he should have been suspended like slipper......
or would that be too fair?
How can you suspend him from the house. Are there any constitutional provisions for this? Slipper has not been suspended from the house, he has stood down as Speaker.
I think he was given a choice... he took that...and I dont blame him on full pay and perks..good luck to him..
I accept this THOMO saga is one of a kind... gawd dont we all hope so...
but honestly he has sat there now for at least two years with this investigation [more than one ]going on...
all the while the ALP have been paying his legal bills..[ this has just come out btw]
as things come out.. and with 1100 pages of ONE investigation..there are bound to be lots of leaks....
NONE OF THEM GOOD>>>
he claims he was trying to do good for a dysfunctional union......
yet doesn't explain what he was trying to achieve or for that matter what he did achieve.
he is painting himself as the victim here and using parliament to point the finger... at someone who really doesnt have the right to stand in parliament and call him a liar...
since when has any pollie been asked to explain himself??????????????????????..
why I am so ropeable is because this is setting a precedent..god knows what the future will bring if any other sleazeball gets elected...
hr id dmilling all over the paper this morning... what the hell has he got to smile about???
he should at least be a little bit humble even apologetic...nup there he is in full blown posturing.