Australian Politics Forum - Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs

BlOoDy RiPpEr Gold Member Offline aussie-patriot.com Posts: 2475 Sydney Gender:	Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?
Back to top	host of the aussie-patriot.com site IP Logged

progressiveslol Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17029	Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs Reply #1 - May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm: How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN? Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.
Back to top	IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #2 - May 5^th, 2012 at 1:54pm

Lets just be grateful that its not a real surplus or we would be plunged into a deep recession that will take years to dig ourselves out of.
Not one economist alive thinks pushing for a surplus while the world economy is slowing and various western countries are falling into double dip recessions is a good idea.

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #3 - May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

corporate_whitey Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 8896 Archivist	Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs Reply #4 - May 5^th, 2012 at 2:06pm Nobody trusts the corporate suckholes running this country or their spin and lies about how rosey everything it.
Back to top	World Wide Working Class Struggle IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #5 - May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

I am not going to argue if a surplus is good or bad. I would argue calling a deficit a surplus is downright deceitful.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #6 - May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

why talk about Abbott? Is he producing the surplus? No, Swan is. How about try and be partisan AND intelligent all at once. At the moment you are failing dreadfully in the latter.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #7 - May 5^th, 2012 at 3:45pm

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

I am not going to argue if a surplus is good or bad. I would argue calling a deficit a surplus is downright deceitful.

They all do it unless there was no long term infustructure spending happening like under Howard.

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

BlOoDy RiPpEr

Gold Member

Offline

aussie-patriot.com

Posts: 2475
Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #8 - May 5^th, 2012 at 6:01pm

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:45pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

I am not going to argue if a surplus is good or bad. I would argue calling a deficit a surplus is downright deceitful.

They all do it unless there was no long term infustructure spending happening like under Howard.

I would like all sides of parliament held accountable after all calling it a surplus in parliament should count as misleading parliament.

Back to top

host of the aussie-patriot.com site

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #9 - May 5^th, 2012 at 6:05pm

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:45pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

I am not going to argue if a surplus is good or bad. I would argue calling a deficit a surplus is downright deceitful.

They all do it unless there was no long term infustructure spending happening like under Howard.

I would like all sides of parliament held accountable after all calling it a surplus in parliament should count as misleading parliament.

All businesses do the same thing in reverse to avoid paying tax..its common accounting

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26592
Australia

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #10 - May 5^th, 2012 at 6:13pm

longweekend58 wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

why talk about Abbott? Is he producing the surplus? No, Swan is. How about try and be partisan AND intelligent all at once. At the moment you are failing dreadfully in the latter.

Pretty sure abbott was saying if he was pm he would supply a "surplus".

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #11 - May 5^th, 2012 at 6:17pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

why talk about Abbott? Is he producing the surplus? No, Swan is. How about try and be partisan AND intelligent all at once. At the moment you are failing dreadfully in the latter.

Pretty sure abbott was saying if he was pm he would supply a "surplus".

SOB

The Libs said they would have produced surpluses all through the GFC and into the future while keeping interest rates at record lows, zero unemployment and record business growth while bringing down fuel and energy prices Grin

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26592
Australia

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #12 - May 5^th, 2012 at 6:19pm

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:17pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

why talk about Abbott? Is he producing the surplus? No, Swan is. How about try and be partisan AND intelligent all at once. At the moment you are failing dreadfully in the latter.

Pretty sure abbott was saying if he was pm he would supply a "surplus".

SOB

The Libs said they would have produced surpluses all through the GFC and into the future while keeping interest rates at record lows, zero unemployment and record business growth while bringing down fuel and energy prices Grin

lolololol

SOB

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

adelcrow

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #13 - May 5^th, 2012 at 6:29pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:19pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:17pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

why talk about Abbott? Is he producing the surplus? No, Swan is. How about try and be partisan AND intelligent all at once. At the moment you are failing dreadfully in the latter.

Pretty sure abbott was saying if he was pm he would supply a "surplus".

SOB

The Libs said they would have produced surpluses all through the GFC and into the future while keeping interest rates at record lows, zero unemployment and record business growth while bringing down fuel and energy prices Grin

lolololol

SOB

Actually the Libs said there was no GFC..it was all just a Labor invention Grin

Back to top

Go the Bunnies

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Its not s surplus when you don't account for costs
Reply #14 - May 5^th, 2012 at 6:33pm

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:05pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:45pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 3:39pm:

adelcrow wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

progressiveslol wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 5^th, 2012 at 1:43pm:

How can Swan claim a surplus when he does not account for costings like the NBN?

Because he is full of shite. This will be pointed out by the liberals party I am sure. Australians will not get fooled again by labor BS.

A surplus at the expense of the economy is not only dumb...its criminal.
If you want to push for mass unemployment and record house foreclosures push for a surplus at all costs.
Only an idiot like Abbott would want to destroy the economy by playing political games in exchange for what he sees as his birthright.

I am not going to argue if a surplus is good or bad. I would argue calling a deficit a surplus is downright deceitful.

They all do it unless there was no long term infustructure spending happening like under Howard.

I would like all sides of parliament held accountable after all calling it a surplus in parliament should count as misleading parliament.

All businesses do the same thing in reverse to avoid paying tax..its common accounting

yeah.. we all overstate our PROFITS to avoid paying tax. sniffing glue is obviously affecting you badly.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged