Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms (Read 3511 times)
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
May 3rd, 2012 at 9:59am
 
Solar powered Windy Farm conspiracy exposed !!!

Wind farm scam a huge cover-up

by: James Delingpole From:The Australian May 03, 2012 12:00AM

ONE of the great popular misconceptions about climate-change sceptics such as Ian Plimer, Bob Carter, Cardinal George Pell and me is that we're all Big-Oil-funded, Gaia-ravaging, nature-hating emissaries of Satan. We can't look at a lovely pristine beach, apparently, without praying for a nice, juicy oil slick to turn up and wipe out all the pelicans and turtles and sea otters.

But this isn't actually true. I love our beautiful planet at least as much as your $180,000-a-year (for a three-day week) climate commissioner Tim Flannery does. One of my great heroes is Patrick Moore, the Canadian co-founder of Greenpeace with whose sensible, rational approach to environmental issues I agree 100 per cent. Another of my heroes, after an article headlined "Where eagles dare not fly" in The Weekend Australian on April 21, is this newspaper's environment editor Graham Lloyd.

It took great courage for Lloyd to write up his expose of the tremendous damage being caused by a wind farm to a small community in Waterloo, north of Adelaide. Most newspaper environment editors -- from Australia to Britain and the US -- tend, unfortunately, to be so ideologically wedded to the supposed virtues of renewable energy they find it all but impossible to criticise it.

Lloyd interviewed a number of victims whose lives had been ruined by the vast, swooshing wind towers looking over their homes. They found sleep almost impossible; they couldn't concentrate; they had night sweats, headaches, palpitations, heart trouble. Their chickens were laying eggs without yolks; their ewes were giving birth to deformed lambs; their once-active dogs spent their days staring blankly at the wall. The damage, it seems, is caused not so much by the noise you can hear but by what you can't hear: the infrasonic waves that attack the balance mechanism in the ear and against which not even home insulation can defend you. Its effects can be felt more than 10km away.

Inspired by Lloyd's article, I went to investigate and was heartbroken by what I found. Until you've seen what it can do to people, it's easy to dismiss wind turbine syndrome as a hypochondriac's charter or an urban myth. But it's real all right. Waterloo felt like a ghost town: shuttered houses and a dust-blown aura of sinister unease, as in a horror movie when something dreadful has happened to a previously ordinary, happy settlement and at first you're not sure what. Then you look up on to the horizon and see them, turning slowly in the breeze . . .

Even more shocking than this, though, were my discoveries about the finance arrangements and behaviour of the wind farm companies. What we have here, I believe, is the biggest and most outrageous public affairs scandal of the 21st century -- one in which the Gillard government is implicated and that far exceeds in seriousness and scope of the Slipper or Thomson sideshows.

At the heart of this scandal are the union superannuation funds that are using the wind farm scam as a kind of government-endorsed Ponzi scheme to fill their coffers at public expense. One of the biggest wind farm developers -- Pacific Hydro -- is owned by the union superfund Members Equity Bank. To meet its carbon reduction quotas, we're told, Australia needs to build about 10,000 new wind turbines like the ones that have destroyed Waterloo (and dozens of communities like it from NSW to South Australia).

The figures are mind-boggling. Each of those turbines will cost about $3 million, which means $30 billion even before you've started building the power lines. And where's this money coming from? The consumer, of course -- mostly via tariffs whacked on to the price of conventional, fossil-fuel energy prices, in the form of payouts called Renewable Energy Certificates.

Note that wind turbines produce very little power. Because wind is intermittent, they operate at between one-fifth and one-third of their capacity, meaning they are erratic, unreliable and have to be fully backed up by conventional "black" (mostly coal-fuelled) power. Where the money is to be made is through the REC subsidy. A 3MW wind turbine that generates (at most) $150,000 worth of electricity a year is eligible for guaranteed subsidies of $500,000 a year. A ridgeline hosting 20 or 30 turbines generates very little power -- but an awful lot of free cash for those lucky enough to get their snouts in the trough.

If the unions were merely exploiting government environmental legislation to milk the taxpayer it would be bad enough: but what makes the wind farm scam so scandalous are the public health issues. Why aren't we more aware of these? Because there have been cover-ups on an epic scale. The owners on whose land the turbines are built are subject to rigorous gagging orders (from law firms such as Julia Gillard's ex-company, Slater & Gordon); tame experts are paid huge sums to testify that there are no health implications; inquiries are rigged; victims are rehoused and silenced with million-dollar payoffs. The global wind farm industry -- a cash cow for everyone from Labor's unions to the mafia -- is so massive it can afford it.

Meanwhile the rest of us lose. Communities are divided, landscapes blighted, birds and bats sliced and diced, property values destroyed, lives ruined to deal with a "problem" -- anthropogenic CO2 causing "global warming" -- which most current evidence tells us doesn't even exist.

As a NSW sheep farmer fighting tooth and nail to stop a wind farm development near his beloved home told me the other day in trenchant style: "The wind-farm business is bloody well near a pedophile ring. They're f . . king our families and knowingly doing so."

James Delingpole's Killing the Earth to Save It (How Environmentalists are Ruining the Planet, Destroying the Economy and Stealing Your Jobs) is out now (Connor Court Publishing).

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opinion/wind-farm-scam-a-huge-c...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #1 - May 3rd, 2012 at 10:52am
 
Yes, they should resite all wind farms to the Australian newspaper office.

Plenty of hot air there.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Incomptinence
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 190
Gender: male
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #2 - May 3rd, 2012 at 12:22pm
 
Green energy devices are a very real health risk.
They might infect you with the HIPPY!

But bugger wind power man I agree on that one. How can you improve wind power? More lube? Solar at least has room for improvement.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Doctor Jolly
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3808
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #3 - May 3rd, 2012 at 1:51pm
 
juliar wrote on May 3rd, 2012 at 9:59am:
...Another of my heroes, after an article headlined "Where eagles dare not fly" in The Weekend Australian on April 21, is this newspaper's environment editor Graham Lloyd.

It took great courage for Lloyd...

....Inspired by Lloyd's article....



Serious case of brown nosing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #4 - May 6th, 2012 at 5:03am
 
Dr Geoff Leventhall, Consultant in Noise Vibration and Acoustics and author of the Defra Report on Low Frequency Noise and its Effects, says:

Quote:
"I can state quite categorically that there is no significant infrasound from current designs of wind turbines."


Does anyone know if there is any substance to these claims about the infrasound from wind turbines? Delingpole is a nutter, but that doesn't mean concerns don't exist.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #5 - May 6th, 2012 at 8:16am
 
I haven't been involved with Wind Farms at all, but Geoff Leventhall is probably the best consultant you can possibly get on the issue. If he says it's no issue, I'd tend to go with his recommendations. By the way DEFRA is the U.K. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

It's funny how some of these grass roots movements come about. I think it comes down to the fact that these wind turbines can be quite unsightly, especially when you see them in beautiful natural settings like the Scottish Highlands.  People will try to come up with all kinds of reasons to ban them. IMHO, they'd be much better being honest and sticking to the real issues that bother them.

Coal Seam Gas is another emotive issue where there is plenty of outrage but few accurate facts. CSG is going to be vital for our economy in years to come. I can't see China importing coal for many more years, and coal is a much too valuable resource just to burn it. When oil finally becomes too expensive, we'll need it as a source of petrochemicals. (but I'm getting off-topic)
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #6 - May 6th, 2012 at 6:46pm
 
Maybe Bob Brown got wind that these scurrilous exposures of windy farm corruption were to be published and that is one of the reasons he decided to fly the coop rather than stay and be repeatedly humiliated when confronted by journalists and interviewers with the horrific exploitation of innocent people by the windy farm monoliths including none other than the good old unions - the very heart of inbred serious corruption !!!

He did not want to meet his waterloo like the poor ignored exploited desperate sick people of Waterloo.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26594
Australia
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #7 - May 6th, 2012 at 6:54pm
 
Australia has a lot of desert. Why arent we focusing more on solar power anyway?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #8 - May 6th, 2012 at 7:01pm
 
juliar wrote on May 6th, 2012 at 6:46pm:
Maybe Bob Brown got wind that these scurrilous exposures of windy farm corruption were to be published and that is one of the reasons he decided to fly the coop rather than stay and be repeatedly humiliated when confronted by journalists and interviewers with the horrific exploitation of innocent people by the windy farm monoliths including none other than the good old unions - the very heart of inbred serious corruption !!!

He did not want to meet his waterloo like the poor ignored exploited desperate sick people of Waterloo.


Do you have anything more credible than the latest offering by James Dilingpole? Are your concerns founded on anything substantive or have you just latched on to the latest reactionary blowhard to take your fancy.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #9 - May 6th, 2012 at 7:02pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 6th, 2012 at 6:54pm:
Australia has a lot of desert. Why arent we focusing more on solar power anyway?

SOB


We can't afford to put all our eggs in one basket.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #10 - May 7th, 2012 at 8:07pm
 
With solar out in the desert there is quite a problem that occurs.

The dust and bird droppings (if there are any birds left that have not been chopped up by the wind farms) gets in their eyes and they can't see the sun anymore.

Out in the arid sweltering scorched desert there isn't much water available to wash the dirt out of their eyes and so the solar farm's output steadily reduces to zero as their view of the sun steadily dims.

A wonderful opportunity for the many weeny greenies on welfare to get a job cleaning the solar panels and reflectors way out in the searing heat of the distant desert.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #11 - May 7th, 2012 at 8:15pm
 
The Communist Greenies don't want the public to know these sort of things about the Bob Brown endorsed windy farms - Part 1.

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Wind Turbines

Posted on January 10, 2012 by Administrator

How big is a wind turbine?
Industrial wind turbines are a lot bigger than ones you might see in a schoolyard or behind someone’s house. The widely used GE 1.5-megawatt model, for example, consists of 116-ft blades atop a 212-ft tower for a total height of 328 feet. The blades sweep a vertical airspace of just under an acre. The 1.8-megawatt Vestas V90 from Denmark is also common. Its 148-ft blades (sweeping more than 1.5 acres) are on a 262-ft tower, totaling 410 feet. Another model being seen more in the U.S. is the 2-megawatt Gamesa G87 from Spain, which sports 143-ft blades (just under 1.5 acres) on a 256-ft tower, totaling 399 feet. Many existing models and new ones being introduced reach well over 400 feet high.

How are the wind turbine components transported?
Transport of such large items and the cranes needed to assemble them often presents problems in the remote areas where they are typically built. Roads must be widened, curves straightened, and in wild areas new roads built altogether.

What kind of platform is a wind turbine set in?
The steel tower is anchored in a platform of more than a thousand tons of concrete and steel rebar, 30 to 50 feet across and anywhere from 6 to 30 feet deep. Shafts are sometimes driven down farther to help anchor it. Mountain tops must be blasted to accommodate it. The platform is critical to stabilizing the immense weight of the turbine assembly.

How much do wind turbines weigh?
In the GE 1.5-megawatt model, the nacelle alone weighs more than 56 tons, the blade assembly weighs more than 36 tons, and the tower itself weighs about 71 tons — a total weight of 164 tons. The corresponding weights for the Vestas V90 are 75, 40, and 152, total 267 tons; and for the Gamesa G87 72, 42, and 220, total 334 tons.

What is the nacelle?
The gearbox — which transforms the slow turning of the blades to a faster rotor speed — and the generator are massive pieces of machinery housed in a bus-sized container, called the nacelle, at the top of the tower. The blades are attached to the rotor hub at one end of the nacelle. Some nacelles include a helicopter landing pad.

Are wind turbines more intrusive than other structures of similar size?
Besides the noise and vibrations such huge moving machines unavoidably generate, they must be topped with flashing lights day and night to increase their visibility. The moving blades attract attention.

How much area is required for a wind power facility?
The huge turbines require a correspondingly large area around them clear of trees and other turbines to maximize the effect of the wind and avoid interference. They should have 10 rotor diameters of clearance in the direction of the wind and 3 rotor diameters in every other direction. In a line of several turbines perpendicular to the wind (as on a mountain ridge), the GE 1.5-MW model would need at least 32 acres and the Vestas V90 78 acres for each tower. In an array that can take advantage of the wind from any direction, the GE needs 82 acres and the Vestas V90 111 acres per tower. In practice, the area varies, averaging about 50 acres per megawatt of capacity. On mountain ridges, the turbines are generally squeezed in about eight per mile.

Can the area around a wind turbine continue to be used?
Only by putting oneself in danger. Besides the unpleasant noises and distracting motion, wind turbines are not safe. They are high-voltage electrical devices with large moving parts. It is estimated that for every 100 turbines, one blade will break off (see Larwood, 2005). In the winter, heavy sheets of ice can build up and then fall or be thrown off. Access to the land around wind turbines is usually restricted, even to the landowner.

Are bigger turbines more efficient?
No, they are just bigger. Output depends on wind speed and the combination of blade diameter and generator size. Bigger blades on a taller tower can capture more wind to run a bigger generator, but they don’t do so more efficiently than smaller models.

http://www.wind-watch.org/faq-wildlife.php

Do birds nest on wind turbines?
Modern turbines have solid instead of latticed towers, so birds can’t rest or nest on them. They can, however, still perch on the nacelle (the bus-sized generator housing at the top of the tower).

Is the lower rpm of modern wind turbines safer for birds and bats?
Modern utility-scale wind turbines turn at a much lower rpm than older models. Because the blades are so long and are moving 150 to 200 mph at the tips, depending on the model, the impact on birds and bats remains substantial.

What studies have been done on the impact of wind turbines on birds and bats?
Few studies have been done to determine the true effect of industrial wind turbines on birds and bats, and fewer studies still that have been done independently of the wind companies’ control. The evidence is clear, though, that wind turbines present yet another threat to the lives of birds and bats. The risk appears to be much greater in some areas than in others. The first-year study of the \”Maple Ridge\” facility on the Tug Hill plateau of New York estimated that 2,000 to 4,000 birds and bats were killed by 120 turbines during the 5-month study period in 2006 (click here for the report; click here for May 1, 2007, testimony to the U.S. House Natural Resources subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans).

What does the US Fish & Wildlife Service think about wind power?
The US Fish & Wildlife Service is concerned about the danger to birds. They have issued siting guidelines which recommend that wind turbines should not be installed near wetlands, on mountain ridges, near shorelines, or in other locations known as concentration areas for wildlife or at sites subject to frequent fog or low-lying clouds during spring and fall migrations.

How do wind turbines affect birds?
Mountain ridges and coastal areas, where industrial turbines are often installed, are features of the landscape that concentrate many birds. Songbirds mostly migrate at night and low enough to collide with the blades of large wind turbines. The presence of large wind turbines may cause birds to avoid the site, thus losing a foraging resource and requiring extra energy to fly around it. The cumulative effect of multiple facilities could have a serious toll on bird populations. The activities of prairie birds, including mating and nesting, are easily disturbed — even at a great distance — by the construction and continuing operation of an industrial wind power facility, which can spread over hundreds, often thousands, of acres.

Are raptors threatened by industrial wind turbines?
Wind power is a unique threat to raptors (hawks, eagles, falcons, owls, and vultures) — many of them already rare — and other large birds, such as ducks, geese, swans, and cranes. The risk of collision not only threatens individual birds but also augments existing threats to their populations. The cumulative effect of multiple facilities may threaten the viable breeding of several species already in decline.

Do wind turbines kill more birds and bats than other human activities?
Promoters of industrial wind power often try to divert our attention to the carnage wrought by office tower windows, cars, and housecats, as if a greater wrong excuses the lesser. Even using the scant data inconsistently compiled by consultants hired by the wind power developers, it is clear that industrial wind turbines kill many more birds and bats per unit than these other causes, particularly raptors (such as eagles and hawks) and migrating bats and songbirds.

Is the impact to birds and bats justified?
Promoters of industrial wind power try to justify the threats to birds and bats with the claim that they are actually saving even more birds by cleaning the air and reversing global warming. They are wrong in that rationalization, because wind power does not replace other sources of electricity (see the \”Output\” FAQ).

http://protectibas.ca/?p=503
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #12 - May 7th, 2012 at 8:17pm
 
The Communist Greenies don't want the public to know these sort of things about the Bob Brown endorsed windy farms - Part 2.

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Wind Turbines

Posted on January 10, 2012 by Administrator


Do wind turbines kill bats?
The threat to bats has turned out to be a problem the industry can’t deny. FPL Energy ended access to its facilities after independent research documented that thousands of bats were killed in just a couple of months at one location and that this pattern of mortality was being seen at other sites as well. To divert attention from this outrage and their lack of action to remedy it, FPL Energy announced in January 2006 that it would fund some bat conservation projects. That effort will not, however, mitigate the harm they are causing, let alone justify or reduce it. A revealing story comes from Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota, which constructed a 1.65-megawatt wind turbine in September 2004 out in the middle of a corn field two miles from campus. In October 2005, the Winona Daily News described a tour led by project director Rob Lampa. Lampa told the group that they had seen no sign of a single bird or bat death since the turbine was switched on. But as they were leaving, one of the group from Winona pointed out something on the ground to one of the county commissioners with her. It was a dead bat. Nearby was another. As one of NWW’s correspondents commented, Lampa will have to make sure the clean-up crew does a better job before the next tour!

Do wind turbines affect other animals besides birds and bats?
As with birds and bats, there are no reliable studies of the effect of industrial wind turbine facilities on other animals. The installation of such large structures in wild areas, along with supporting roads and transmission infrastructure and the clearing of trees on mountain ridges, inevitably has a negative effect, if only because of the loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat, especially ecologically vital interior forest. The turbines also move (producing noise and vibration) and are lit by strobes day and night, adding to the distressing impact they likely have. Until good studies are done, we have anecdotal evidence such as the following about the effect of a wind facility on Backbone Mountain, West Virginia: \”I looked around me, to a place where months before had been prime country for deer, wild turkey, and yes, black bear, to see positively no sign of any of the animals about at all. This alarmed me, so I scouted in the woods that afternoon. All afternoon, I found no sign, sight, or peek of any animal about.\”

Source Source URL Source Date
National Wind Watch http://www.wind-watch.org/faq-size-p.php
This entry was posted in Industrial Wind Turbines. Bookmark the permalink.

http://protectibas.ca/?p=503
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #13 - May 7th, 2012 at 8:33pm
 
You are aware that fossil fuel based energy causes 10 time more bird fatalities than wind power. That's per GWh by the way. Try again, Jules.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Hidden horrors of solar powered windy farms
Reply #14 - May 8th, 2012 at 7:08am
 
How many birds are killed by trains? - by motor vehicles? -- by industrial  stacks,  by domestic cats?

I'd suggest that this is beat up beyond belief because it doesn't actually provide any data on bird kills other than speculation.

I watched a flock of birds fly into a brown NOx cloud from coal blasting. They suddenly changed their course to vertically downwards and were not seen again.  We never hear about the cattle caught in NOx clouds, because mining companies tend to be very generous when that happens, as long as the farmer signs a non disclosure statement.

Everything we do has some risk associated with it.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print