Frances wrote on May 2
nd, 2012 at 3:53pm:
The circumstances concerning options 2, 3 and 4 have not yet arisen.
I had meant that they had not yet arisen during the course of this parliament. I would have thought that was obvious but, given the limited intelligence of some of the members of this forum, maybe I should have been a bit more specific on that point.
borntorule wrote on May 2
nd, 2012 at 6:25pm:
You have interpreted 1 incorrectly. The GG asks both parties (the existing PM first) if they have the confidence of the house and if they do are appointed PM. The GG does not appoint on a whim.
I have not interpreted it incorrectly. The appointment would, of course, occur after the discussions have taken place.
borntorule wrote on May 2
nd, 2012 at 6:25pm:
2 has happened before when a vote of no-confidence in the govt is won and the GG asks the oppsotion lead if he can forma govt.
It has happened in the past and could happen again.
borntorule wrote on May 2
nd, 2012 at 6:25pm:
was actually done in the NSW parl in the 30s when the govt of the day refused to pay a loan to the UK
You are referring, I take it, to Jack Lang's dismissal in 1932. I think you will find that it was Lang's decision to withdraw State funds from government bank accounts to prevent the Federal government having access to the money in order to repay the foreign loans that was deemed illegal by Game, rather than the non-payment of the loans.
borntorule wrote on May 2
nd, 2012 at 6:25pm:
4 I am not aware that this power exists and if it does it has never been used.
It does exist.