Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 8
Send Topic Print
Islamic Terrorists in Particular (Read 14621 times)
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #15 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:34am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 9:37am:
[quote]It suits the ameircans to get everyone int he world to associate the word "terror" with "muslims".












Former Israeli PM Ehud Barak starts Bin Laden rumour on 9/11:






https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #16 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am
 
abu_rashid wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:10am:
freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 9:19am:
abu_rashid wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 9:16am:
SOB,

Terrorism is just the propaganda term coined by the Western powers to de-legitimise the struggle of the Muslim peoples they are occupying, invading and slaughtering.



So 9/11 was not terrorism because it was 'legitimate'?


I dunno... was nuking the civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a 'legitimate' reaction to Pearl Harbour?

Let us weigh these kinds of actions up on an actual scale, rather than just by using emotive terms that have very little concrete meaning.


I remember you used to be pretty sure they were illegitimate. Have you softened your opposition to terrorism? Is this something to do with your belief that the west has been at war with the Muslim world for over a century?

Regarding Hiroshima, this was far more than a response to Pearl Harbour. We were at war. This was a real war, not the century long imaginary war between the west and the Muslim world. If you want the right answer, it helps to start with the right question. Hiroshima is usually weighed up against alternative future scenarios at the time, rather than as some kind of revenge.

Perhaps this is the problem with militant Islam and their supporters and excusers such as yourself. They always consider militant action as a reaction to the past, rather than in the context of what it might bring in the future. I doubt Osama's intended outcome of 9/11 was the west invading Afghanistan, deposing the Taliban and setting up a democracy. Yet it was fairly obvious. Maybe it has something to do with fatalism - it was their fate to retaliate against past actions with 9/11, and whatever the long term consequences are, that is also fate (and an inevitable victory?), rather than something they have to take responsibility for. You need some serious mental block to think that picking a fight with the most powerful nation on earth is a good idea.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #17 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 6:23pm
 
freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
I remember you used to be pretty sure they were illegitimate.


I did? I'd like to see that.

I did not pass any judgement on the legitimacy of anything. I personally don't believe an accurate scale exists on which to judge such things in the current geo-political climate.


freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
Have you softened your opposition to terrorism?


I have not softened anything, the issue is around what is defined as terrorism. My position has always been, and will always be, that the U.S and their proxies like the Zionist entity are the primary perpetrators of terrorism throughout the world. I don't know of any Muslim organisation that bases its actions on an ideology called terrorism.

The question for you fd, is do you consider it terrorism to respond to an aggressive and hostile entity that is in your land?

freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
Is this something to do with your belief that the west has been at war with the Muslim world for over a century?


I've provided numerous times lists of hostile actions the Western states have carried out against the Muslim world, and continues to carry out against the Muslim world over the past century or two, and still you try to frame this as "your belief"???? It's a well established fact. The only problem you have is, you think Muslims should just accept those hostilities as a natural part of the West's "energy security" and live with it.

You are a peddler of tyranny, an excuser of inhumanity and in the end an ardent supporter of terrorism.

freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
Regarding Hiroshima, this was far more than a response to Pearl Harbour. We were at war. This was a real war, not the century long imaginary war...


What you're really saying here is "We had governments to actually carry out a co-ordinated response to the Japanese hostilities, therefore our actions were more justifiable, whilst Muslims are acting individually, because their governments are all sold out puppets, and therefore no actual war is officially declared, and their responses are illegitimate".

You might think pissing in your own pocket to keep yourself warm is smart, but others will obviously not be so impressed by it.

freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
Hiroshima is usually weighed up against alternative future scenarios at the time, rather than as some kind of revenge.


Hiroshima was an outright deliberate attack of massive annihilation on a civilian population using WMD. Plain and simple. You can sugar coat it all you like, but at the end of the day it is what it is. 9/11 isn't even a drop in the ocean compared to Hiroshima & Nagasaki. If the 9/11 perpetrators were terrorists, then the U.S government must be the most abominable entity on earth.

freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
They always consider militant action as a reaction to the past, rather than in the context of what it might bring in the future.


Right, because we don't believe in just attacking people for no reason, or for greedy reasons like "energy security". Therefore the only paradigm in which we understand hostility to make any sense is in response to hostility. You on the other hand are quite comfortable with hostility for it's own sake, or for securing the energy wealth of others.

You present yourself well in this statement fd.

freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
I doubt Osama's intended outcome of 9/11 was the west invading Afghanistan, deposing the Taliban..


Right... it was just a nice way of saying "get the hell out of our land you mongrels".

freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
and setting up a democracy.


You still believe this tripe?  Grin

Btw did anyone here happen to catch Restrepo the other night? Was a very interesting watch, especially at the end when they mentioned when the valley finally was taken back over by the Talibaan.

freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 11:46am:
You need some serious mental block to think that picking a fight with the most powerful nation on earth is a good idea.


You will learn one day, the Muslim fears nothing but his Creator. Powerful nations come and go.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #18 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 6:41pm
 
Quote:
I did? I'd like to see that.


I thought you said that acts like 9/11 went against Islamic principles.

Quote:
I did not pass any judgement on the legitimacy of anything. I personally don't believe an accurate scale exists on which to judge such things in the current geo-political climate.


In other words, who is to say what is right and wrong in this topsy turvy world? It really is not like you to doubt yourself Abu.

Quote:
The question for you fd, is do you consider it terrorism to respond to an aggressive and hostile entity that is in your land?


Terrorism is first about the methods used Abu.

Quote:
I've provided numerous times lists of hostile actions the Western states have carried out against the Muslim world, and continues to carry out against the Muslim world over the past century or two, and still you try to frame this as "your belief"???? It's a well established fact.


Correct. It is 'your belief', and a rather absurd one at that, that the west has been at war with the Muslim world for over 100 year. Osama for example declared war on the west many years before 9/11. Most people didn't even notice at the time. It wasn't until he managed to drag the US and Afghanistan into it that there was a real war happening.

Quote:
You are a peddler of tyranny, an excuser of inhumanity and in the end an ardent supporter of terrorism.


Says the guy who doesn't know whether 9/11 was a good thing or a bad thing.

Quote:
What you're really saying here is "We had governments to actually carry out a co-ordinated response to the Japanese hostilities, therefore our actions were more justifiable, whilst Muslims are acting individually, because their governments are all sold out puppets, and therefore no actual war is officially declared, and their responses are illegitimate".


That sounds very similar to the reason you gave for why 9/11 was wrong from an Islamic perspective.

Quote:
You can sugar coat it all you like


I am not sugar coating anything Abu. Just giving you the facts.

Quote:
Right... it was just a nice way of saying "get the hell out of our land you mongrels".


Are you disagreeing with me Abu? It is hard to tell.

Quote:
You will learn one day, the Muslim fears nothing but his Creator. Powerful nations come and go.


Abu, it is you, not me, who complains so bitterly that so many Muslims are stuck in the middle of a nation coming and going.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Avram Horowitz
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #19 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 8:46pm
 
Islamic terrorist have blood on their hands of many women and children.

When you see Hamas celebrates deaths of little children it shows the world the animals they are.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #20 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 8:55pm
 
Israeli Jewish terrorists promoting killing pregnant women:

...
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #21 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 9:38pm
 
Imagine his surprise when the 'stomach' of the pregnant 'woman' exploded with the impact of the bullet.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7062
Gender: female
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #22 - Apr 28th, 2012 at 9:53pm
 
You have a really f.cked up sense of humour, FD.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #23 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 12:45am
 
freediver wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 9:38pm:
Imagine his surprise when the 'stomach' of the pregnant 'woman' exploded with the impact of the bullet.


What a poor excuse for a human being you are.

Making a joke about gunning down pregnant women is a cause for amusement in your sick little world is it?

Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Avram Horowitz
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #24 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 2:06am
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 28th, 2012 at 9:53pm:
You have a really f.cked up sense of humour, FD.


Arab terrorists has pretend to be pregnant women before so as to get pass checkpoint.
See Annie you has say to me before that on checkpoints we can be tough to pregnant women this is why!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #25 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 9:08am
 
"Is that a stick of gelignite under your burqa or are you just happy to see me?"
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7062
Gender: female
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #26 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 10:16am
 
That's not particularly funny either, but at least it's not making light of a tshirt designed to advocate the (unauthorised) 1 shot 2 kills philosophy of certain members of the IDF. Shooting pregnant women - what a hoot.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Avram Horowitz
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3153
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #27 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 10:21am
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 29th, 2012 at 10:16am:
That's not particularly funny either, but at least it's not making light of a tshirt designed to advocate the (unauthorised) 1 shot 2 kills philosophy of certain members of the IDF. Shooting pregnant women - what a hoot.




It does not happen, it is only a tee shirt.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #28 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 10:24am
 
I get it now. I thought it was just bad English - I shot 2 kills.

Thanks for sharing Falah.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7062
Gender: female
Re: Islamic Terrorists in Particular
Reply #29 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 10:33am
 
Avram Horowitz wrote on Apr 29th, 2012 at 10:21am:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 29th, 2012 at 10:16am:
That's not particularly funny either, but at least it's not making light of a tshirt designed to advocate the (unauthorised) 1 shot 2 kills philosophy of certain members of the IDF. Shooting pregnant women - what a hoot.




It does not happen, it is only a tee shirt.



If I wore a tshirt of a pregnant woman being ushered into a gas chamber at Auschwitz, would that you say that's "only a tee shirt" then too?

No, because it's bullshit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 8
Send Topic Print