Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Governments-of-LARGESSE are defined as what? (Read 185 times)
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Governments-of-LARGESSE are defined as what?
Apr 20th, 2012 at 2:48pm
 
1)
The wasters of resource booms perhaps?


Undecided
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Governments-of-LARGESSE are defined as what?
Reply #1 - Apr 20th, 2012 at 3:30pm
 

WTF

...<---DRAH

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Governments-of-LARGESSE are defined as what?
Reply #2 - Apr 20th, 2012 at 4:05pm
 
Swagman wrote on Apr 20th, 2012 at 3:30pm:

Swagman is embarrased of the Howard legacy!

Cheesy Cheesy  Embarrassed
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: Governments-of-LARGESSE are defined as what?
Reply #3 - Apr 20th, 2012 at 4:33pm
 
Given what he has posted in the past, I would think that Swagman is proud of the Howard legacy, rather than embarrassed by it.....
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Governments-of-LARGESSE are defined as what?
Reply #4 - Apr 20th, 2012 at 4:43pm
 
Frances wrote on Apr 20th, 2012 at 4:33pm:
Given what he has posted in the past, I would think that Swagman is proud of the Howard legacy, rather than embarrassed by it.....

...he's not saying much after Joe Hockey put a hole in the myth that Howard was economically responsible!!

... oh looky looky, Malcolm Turnbull has come out and said the same!!
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print